| Literature DB >> 29513049 |
Jiulong Zhang1, Chunrong Yang2, Shuang Pan1, Menghao Shi1, Jie Li3, Haiyang Hu1, Mingxi Qiao1, Dawei Chen1, Xiuli Zhao1.
Abstract
Mitochondrial-targeting therapy was considered to be a promising approach for the efficient treatment of cancer while positive charge induced nonspecific cytotoxicity severely limits its application. To overcome this drawback, a novel mitochondria targeted conjugate triphenylphosphine-docetaxel (TD) has been synthesized successfully and incorporated it into liposomes (EPSLP/TD), which possessed excellent pH-sensitive characteristic, EphA 10 mediated active targetability as well as mitochondria-targeting capability. EPSLP/TD was characterized to have a small particle size, high-encapsulation efficiency and excellent pH-sensitive characteristic. Compared with DTX-loaded liposomes (EPSLP/DTX), EPSLP/TD possessed higher cytotoxicity against MCF-7 cell line. Mitochondrial-targeting assay demonstrated mitochondria-targeting moiety triphenylphosphine (TPP) could efficiently deliver DTX to mitochondria. Western immunoblotting assay indicated that EPSLP/TD could efficiently deliver antitumor drug to mitochondria and induce cell apoptosis via mitochondria-mediated apoptosis pathway. In vivo antitumor study demonstrated EPSLP/TD owed excellent in vivo antitumor activity. Histological assay demonstrated EPSLP/TD showed strongly apoptosis inducing effect, anti-proliferation effect and anti-angiogenesis effect. This work investigated the potential of hierarchical targeting pH-sensitive liposomes is a suitable carrier to activate mitochondria-mediated apoptosis pathway for cancer therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Docetaxel conjugate; anticancer efficacy; hierarchical targetability; multifunctional liposomes; pH-responsive
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29513049 PMCID: PMC6058733 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2018.1446475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.419
Characterization of different liposomes.
| Formulations | Particle size (nm) | PDI | Zeta potential (mV) | EE % | LC % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Lip | 102.2 ± 1.6 | 0.213 ± 0.015 | −10.26 ± 0.33 | – | – |
| LP/DTX | 108.2 ± 3.2 | 0.265 ± 0.018 | −8.29 ± 0.21 | 69.11 ± 1.65 | 3.84 ± 0.09 |
| LP/TD | 110.2 ± 5.1 | 0.218 ± 0.062 | 9.12 ± 0.33 | 73.23 ± 3.54 | 4.07 ± 0.20 |
| PSLP/DTX | 115.3 ± 2.4 | 0.224 ± 0.011 | −15.23 ± 0.31 | 68.52 ± 1.25 | 3.60 ± 0.07 |
| PSLP/TD | 118.6 ± 1.8 | 0.214 ± 0.021 | −2.15 ± 0.14 | 72.15 ± 2.51 | 3.79 ± 0.13 |
| EPSLP/DTX | 129.3 ± 1.5 | 0.241 ± 0.033 | −23.65 ± 0.54 | 69.24 ± 3.55 | 2.56 ± 1.25 |
| EPSLP/TD | 131.5 ± 2.6 | 0.252 ± 0.021 | −16.25 ± 0.38 | 74.68 ± 1.68 | 3.83 ± 0.09 |
| EPELP/TD | 133.0 ± 1.5 | 0.102 ± 0.085 | −17.10 ± 0.22 | 75.68 ± 1.14 | 3.88 ± 0.06 |
Figure 1.Physicochemical properties of liposomal formulations. (A) Particle size distribution of TD loaded liposomes (EPSLP/TD); (B) TEM images of EPSLP/TD; (C) zeta potential variation of EPSLP/TD and EPELP/TD at different pH values; (D) In vitro serum stability assay of liposomal formulations in the presence of 10% FBS at 37°.
Figure 2.Mitochondrial targeting of liposomal formulations. (A) Mitochondrial co-localization of FITC (or TF) loaded liposomes in MCF-7 cell lines by confocal laser scanning microscopy. MCF-7 cells were incubated with different formulations (green pixel dots) and then stained the mitochondria with MitoTracker Red (red pixel dots). Yellow pixel dots in the merged pictures denote the colocalization of the probe within mitochondria compartments. (B and C) The accumulation of fluorescence probes into mitochondria against MCF-7 cells measured by flow cytometry. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 3), *p < .05, **p < .01. Scale bars represent 25 μm.
Figure 3.In vivo antitumor efficacy of different formulations against MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice (n = 6). Tumor volume changes (A) and body weight variation (B) of the tumor-bearing mice with different DTX and TD dosage. Body weight (C) and tumor volume changes (D) of the mice when they were intravenously injected PSLP/DTX, PSLP/TD, EPSLP/DTX and EPSLP/TD with the TD or DTX concentration was 5 μmol kg-1. At the end of the trial, tumor tissues were isolated and inhibition rate (E) was calculated. Meanwhile, tumor images (F) of different liposomal formulations were photographed. Note: *p < .05, **p < .01.
Figure 4.Tumors from previous study were isolated, fixed using formalin and prepared paraffin sections for histological study. H and E staining, Ki-67 immunohistochemistry (IHC), CD31 IHC and TUNEL immunofluorescence of tumor tissues were carried out to evaluate the antiproliferation, anti-angiogenic and apoptosis-inducing effect of different formulations (A). Quantification of proliferative cells from six random fields (brown and blue pixel dots represent the proliferative cells and the nucleic, respectively). The Ki-67 index was calculated as the ratio of proliferative cells to total cells in each field (B). Quantification of angiogenic cells from six random fields (brown and blue pixel dots represent the tumor vessel and the nucleic, respectively). The CD31 index was calculated as the ratio of angiogenic cells to total cells in each field (C). *p < .05, **p <.01. Scale bars represent 100 μm for CD31 IHC and 50 μm for other groups.