| Literature DB >> 29512723 |
Hiroshi Mikamo1, Meizi Jiang2, Mahito Noro1, Yasuo Suzuki3, Nobuyuki Hiruta4, Hiroyuki Unoki-Kubota5, Wolfgang J Schneider6, Hideaki Bujo2.
Abstract
The upregulation of brown or brown-like beige adipocytes is a potential strategy for the prevention or treatment of diabetes and coronary artery diseases in obese patients. Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) differs significantly from subcutaneous fat tissue (SAT) in metabolic properties. To investigate properties of EAT further, thermogenesis gene expression was investigated in human autopsy and murine samples, and adipocytes differentiated from EAT mesenchymal cells. Subsequently, analyzed EAT volume alterations were observed to be associated with weight reduction in obese patients by imaging. Gene expression analyses of autopsy samples revealed that UCP‑1 mRNA levels in EAT were significantly increased compared with SAT, and β3‑adrenergic receptor (AR) levels tended to be increased; this finding was verified in comparing EAT with SAT in mice. Browning stimulation of human EAT‑derived MCs increased uncoupling protein‑1 and β3‑AR levels by 3.2 fold‑ and 12.6‑fold compared with SAT‑derived MCs, respectively. Subsequent imaging for EAT volume measurement using multi‑detector computed tomography in 10 obese patients revealed that mean EAT volumes did not significantly decrease following weight loss therapy. The EAT volume alterations were not correlated with weight changes, whereas positive correlations were observed in SAT and visceral adipose tissue. Therefore, the studies in man and mouse on EAT properties demonstrated that susceptibilities of EAT and SAT for browning‑gene expression and diet‑induced volume reduction were grossly different. The data suggest a potential association of EAT with local thermogenetic and metabolic homeostasis in cardiac and/or cardiovascular cells, in conjunction with systemic energy metabolism.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29512723 PMCID: PMC5928636 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8690
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Med Rep ISSN: 1791-2997 Impact factor: 2.952
Backgrounds of autopsy samples.
| No. | Age | Sex | Duration after death (h) | CA | AA | Pathological diagnosis | Height | Weight | BMI | DM | HT | DL | Smoking history | AD | NAD | DOA | DOB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80 | 0 | 11:00 | ± | ± | Sepsis, acute pyelonephritis | 148 | 50 | 22.8 | − | + | − | 0 | + | − | − | − |
| 2 | 88 | 0 | 6:27 | + | ++ | Sepsis | 155 | 60 | 25.0 | + | + | + | 0 | − | − | + | − |
| 3 | 72 | 0 | 15:17 | ++ | Acute myocardial infarction | 149 | 56.9 | 25.6 | + | − | + | 0 | − | + | + | + | |
| 4 | 65 | 1 | 15:98 | ± | ± | Lung adenocarcinoma | 160 | 54.7 | 21.4 | − | + | + | 2 | − | − | − | − |
| 5 | 73 | 1 | 1:47 | + | ± | Interstitial pneumonia | 157 | 38 | 15.4 | − | − | + | 2 | − | − | − | − |
| 6 | 69 | 1 | 3:55 | ± | ± | Pancreas cancer | 164 | 55 | 20.5 | − | + | + | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| 7 | 81 | 1 | 7:50 | + | ± | Occult primary cancer | 165 | 43.7 | 16.1 | − | + | − | 2 | − | − | − | − |
| 8 | 74 | 1 | 0:67 | ++ | ++ | Lung cancer | 163 | 53.4 | 20.1 | + | − | + | 1 | − | − | + | − |
| 9 | 79 | 1 | 19:00 | ± | ± | Hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cirrhosis | 66.2 | + | + | + | 0 | + | − | − | − | ||
| 10 | 63 | 1 | 4:37 | ± | ± | Squamous cell cancer of the lung | 165 | 70 | 25.7 | + | − | − | 2 | − | − | − | − |
| 11 | 67 | 1 | 13:20 | ± | ± | Malignant pancreatic endocrine tumor | 163 | 46 | 17.3 | − | − | + | 2 | − | − | − | − |
| 12 | 68 | 1 | 5:22 | ± | ± | Prostate cancer | 168 | 55.7 | 19.7 | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| 13 | 68 | 0 | 11:17 | ± | ± | Pulmonary thromboembolism | 156.6 | 44.9 | 18.2 | − | − | − | 0 | + | − | − | − |
| 14 | 65 | 1 | 2:33 | ++ | ± | Acute heart failure | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | |||
| 15 | 64 | 1 | 16:87 | ± | ± | Senile systemic amyloidosis | 160 | 57 | 22.3 | + | + | − | 0 | + | + | − | − |
| 16 | 81 | 0 | 13:55 | ± | ± | Acute heart failure, Dilated cardiomyopathy | 148 | 41.6 | 19.0 | − | − | − | 0 | − | − | − | − |
| 17 | 62 | 1 | 20:33 | ± | ± | Malignant pancreatic endocrine tumor | 180 | 41.8 | 12.9 | − | − | − | 2 | − | − | − | − |
| 18 | 64 | 0 | 1:78 | ± | ± | Thyrotoxic crisis | 163 | 45 | 16.9 | − | − | − | 0 | + | − | − | − |
Sex, (0, female; 1, male); CA, coronary atherosclerosis, (±, mild; +, moderate; ++, severe); AA, aortic atherosclerosis, (±, mild; +, moderate; ++, severe); BMI, body mass index; DM, diabetes; HT, hypertension; DL, dyslipidemia; smoking history, (0, non-smoker; 1, current smoker; 2, ex-smoker); AD, adrenaline; NAD, noradrenaline; DOA, dopamine; DOB, dobutamine.
Characteristics and biochemistry of study subjects before and after weight reduction therapy.
| Variables | Before | After | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 44.6±16.2 | − | ||
| Male | 8 (80%) | − | ||
| Weight loss duration (days) | 44.1±27.6 | − | ||
| Current smoker | 5 (50%) | − | ||
| TC (mg/dl) | 177.3±45.8 | 160.5±32.1 | 0.235 | |
| TG (mg/dl) | 118.1±40.1 | 105.4±23.1 | 0.445 | |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 38.2±5.6 | 39.2±7.5 | 0.735 | |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 117.5±43.4 | 99.6±32.0 | 0.097 | |
| SBP (mmHg) | 136.0±19.8 | 129.7±17.7 | 0.144 | |
| DBP (mmHg) | 80.7±13.1 | 75.7±10.6 | 0.216 | |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | 72.6±11.8 | 65.7±7.8 | 0.085 | |
| FPG (mg/dl) | 112.5±35.4 | 98.4±18.4 | 0.234 | |
| HbA1c (JDS) (%) | 6.9±1.3 | 6.2±0.7 | 0.084 | |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 1.08±0.4 | 1.94±2.6 | 0.324 | |
| Uric acid (mg/dl) | 7.6±2.4 | 6.5±1.5 | 0.100 | |
| Complications | ||||
| CAD | 2 (20%) | |||
| Renal dysfunction | 3 (30%) | |||
| Medications | 5 (50%) | |||
| Diabetes excluding insulin | ||||
| Insulin supplementation | 0 (0%) | |||
| Hypertension | 9 (90%) | |||
| Dyslipidemia | 3 (30%) |
Values are mean ± SD or n (%). The statistical differences were analyzed by the paired Student t-test. TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; JDS, Japan Diabetes Society; CAD, coronary artery disease.
Figure 1.The levels of UCP-1 (A) β3-AR (B) leptin (C) TNF-α (D) and VEGF (E) in EAT or SAT from human autopsy samples. Each mRNA level was analyzed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, as described in Materials and Methods. The mRNA levels relative to 18S RNA levels were calculated, and expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=15). The statistical differences were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-test. n.s., not significant; UCP, uncoupling protein; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; β3-AR, β3-adrenergic receptor.
Figure 2.The levels of UCP-1 (A) β3-AR (B) leptin (C) TNF-α (D) and VEGF (E) in EAT or SAT from a mouse model (db/db). Each mRNA level was analyzed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction as described in Materials and Methods. The mRNA levels relative to 18S RNA levels were calculated and expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=5). The statistical differences were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-test. n.s., not significant; UCP, uncoupling protein; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; β3-AR, β3-adrenergic receptor.
Figure 3.The levels of mRNA for UCP-1 (A) and β3-AR (B) in MCs from EAT or SAT of a human autopsy sample. mRNA was prepared from the cells incubated with/without browning differentiation stimulation for 8 days, and each mRNA level was analyzed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, as described in Materials and Methods. mRNA levels relative to 18S RNA levels were calculated and expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n=3). The statistical differences were analyzed by the unpaired Student t-test. Pre EAT, MCs from EAT without differentiation stimulation; pre SAT, MCs from SAT without differentiation stimulation; brown EAT, MCs from EAT with browning differentiation stimulation; brown SAT, MCs from SAT with browning differentiation stimulation. n.s., not significant; UCP, uncoupling protein; MCs, mesenchymal cells; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; β3-AR, β3-adrenergic receptor.
Adipose tissues and weights of obese patients before and after weight reduction therapy and their reductions after therapy.
| Variables | Before (n=10) | After (n=10) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| EAT (ml) | 248.65±36.57 | 237.47±57.17 | 0.249 |
| VAT (mm2) | 190.93±74.78 | 153.91±72.70 | 0.001 |
| SAT (mm2) | 431.63±206.76 | 375.37±206.16 | 0.003 |
| Body weight (kg) | 109.54±28.87 | 100.24±26.73 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 38.75±9.36 | 35.45±8.65 | <0.001 |
| Reduction in weight (%) | 8.43±3.19 | ||
| Reduction in BMI (%) | 8.43±3.19 | ||
| Reduction in EAT (%) | 5.49±12.86 | ||
| Reduction in VAT (%) | 20.61±14.77 | ||
| Reduction in SAT (%) | 15.58±11.48 | ||
Values are mean ± SD The statistical differences were analyzed by the paired Student t-test. EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; BMI, body mass index; reductions, reductions from baseline (%) which were calculated by the equation of (values before therapy - values after therapy)/(values before therapy) ×100.
Comparisons of reductions in adipose tissues with weights after therapy.
| Variables | r2 | 95% CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reduction in EAT | 0.103 | −0.112~0.271 | 0.365 |
| Reduction in VAT | 0.806 | 0.116~0.272 | <0.001 |
| Reduction in SAT | 0.487 | 0.032~0.356 | 0.025 |
Comparisons of reductions in adipose tissues with weights were performed using correlation analysis with linear regression analysis. r2, coefficient of determination; CI, confidence interval; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; reductions, reductions from baseline (%) which were calculated by the equation of (values before therapy-values after therapy)/(values before therapy) ×100.
Correlations between pairs of reductions among EAT, SAT and VAT.
| Variables | r2 | 95% CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| EAT vs. VAT | 0.158 | −0.306~0.997 | 0.256 |
| EAT vs. SAT | 0.259 | −0.216~1.356 | 0.133 |
| VAT vs. SAT | 0.614 | 0.356~1.659 | 0.007 |
Comparisons of reductions among adipose tissues were performed using correlation analysis with linear regression analysis. r2, coefficient of determination; CI, confidence interval; EAT, epicardial adipose tissue; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; Reductions, Reductions from baseline (%) which were calculated by the equation of (values before therapy-values after therapy)/(values before therapy) ×100.