Literature DB >> 29512425

Improving Measurement Efficiency of the Inner EAR Scale with Item Response Theory.

Annika Jessen1, Andrew D Ho1, C Eduardo Corrales2, Bevan Yueh3, Jennifer J Shin2.   

Abstract

Objectives (1) To assess the 11-item Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) instrument with item response theory (IRT). (2) To determine whether the underlying latent ability could also be accurately represented by a subset of the items for use in high-volume clinical scenarios. (3) To determine whether the Inner EAR instrument correlates with pure tone thresholds and word recognition scores. Design IRT evaluation of prospective cohort data. Setting Tertiary care academic ambulatory otolaryngology clinic. Subjects and Methods Modern psychometric methods, including factor analysis and IRT, were used to assess unidimensionality and item properties. Regression methods were used to assess prediction of word recognition and pure tone audiometry scores. Results The Inner EAR scale is unidimensional, and items varied in their location and information. Information parameter estimates ranged from 1.63 to 4.52, with higher values indicating more useful items. The IRT model provided a basis for identifying 2 sets of items with relatively lower information parameters. Item information functions demonstrated which items added insubstantial value over and above other items and were removed in stages, creating a 8- and 3-item Inner EAR scale for more efficient assessment. The 8-item version accurately reflected the underlying construct. All versions correlated moderately with word recognition scores and pure tone averages. Conclusion The 11-, 8-, and 3-item versions of the Inner EAR scale have strong psychometric properties, and there is correlational validity evidence for the observed scores. Modern psychometric methods can help streamline care delivery by maximizing relevant information per item administered.

Keywords:  audiometry; clinical care; factor analysis; health status; hearing; hearing loss; inner ear; item response theory; psychometrics; pure tone averages; quality of life; validated instrument; word recognition scores

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29512425     DOI: 10.1177/0194599818760528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  4 in total

1.  The Revised Hearing Handicap Inventory and Screening Tool Based on Psychometric Reevaluation of the Hearing Handicap Inventories for the Elderly and Adults.

Authors:  Christy Cassarly; Lois J Matthews; Annie N Simpson; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Development and Refinement of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hearing: A Brief Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Christy Cassarly; Lois J Matthews; Annie N Simpson; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.493

3.  Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments.

Authors:  Theodore R McRackan; Brittany N Hand; Craig A Velozo; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral Furosemide Among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jennifer E Flythe; Magdalene M Assimon; Matthew J Tugman; Julia H Narendra; Simran K Singh; Wanting Jin; Quefeng Li; Nisha Bansal; Thomas H Hostetter; Laura M Dember
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-07-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.