Literature DB >> 29512217

Partnering with insiders: A review of peer models across community-engaged research, education and social care.

Lisa M Vaughn1, Crystal Whetstone2, Alicia Boards3, Melida D Busch4, Maria Magnusson5, Sylvia Määttä6,7.   

Abstract

Within community-engaged research, education and social care, peer models that partner with local "insiders" are increasingly common. Peer models are composed of insider "lay" community members who often share similarities or background with a project's target population. Peers are not academically trained, but work alongside researchers and professionals to carry out specific tasks within a project, or in the truest sense of partnership, peers collaborate throughout the project from start to finish as an equal member of the team. Although peer models are used widely, the literature lacks consistency and clarity. This systematic review of literature used a qualitative thematic synthesis to examine and report how, where and why peer models have been used in research, education and social care. We examined the language and titles used to describe the peers, details of their involvement in community-engaged projects, the setting, content/topic of study, level of engagement and related benefits/outcomes of such models. Focusing on the last 10 years, we conducted a comprehensive literature search twice between September 2016 and June 2017. The search resulted in 814 articles which were assessed for eligibility. Overall, 251 articles met our inclusion criteria and were categorised into three categories: empirical (n = 115); process/descriptive (n = 93); and "about" peers (n = 43). Findings suggest that there is a wide variety of peers, titles and terminology associated with peer models. There is inconsistency in how these models are used and implemented in research studies and projects. The majority of articles used an employment peer model, while only a handful involved peers in all phases of the project. The results of this literature review contribute to understanding the use, development and evolution of peer models. We highlight potential benefits of peer models for peers, their communities and community-engaged work, and we offer recommendations for future implementation of peer models.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  co-researcher; community health worker; community-engaged research; insider; peer educator; peer models

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29512217     DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  11 in total

1.  Participatory approaches in the development of health interventions for migrants: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kieran Rustage; Alison Crawshaw; Saliha Majeed-Hajaj; Anna Deal; Laura Nellums; Yusuf Ciftci; Sebastian S Fuller; Lucy Goldsmith; Jon S Friedland; Sally Hargreaves
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Time for revolution? Enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure-focused science.

Authors:  Jillian S Y Lau; Miranda Z Smith; Brent Allan; Karine Dubé; A Toni Young; Jennifer Power
Journal:  J Virus Erad       Date:  2020-10-15

3.  Sexual Health Interventions for Racial/Ethnic Minorities Using Community-Based Participatory Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caravella McCuistian; Bridgette Peteet; Kathy Burlew; Farrah Jacquez
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2021-04-17

Review 4.  Positionality of Community Health Workers on Health Intervention Research Teams: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kiera Coulter; Maia Ingram; Deborah Jean McClelland; Abby Lohr
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-06-16

5.  "Is there anything good about a water advisory?": an exploration of the consequences of drinking water advisories in an indigenous community.

Authors:  Kayla J Lucier; Corinne J Schuster-Wallace; Derek Skead; Kathleen Skead; Sarah E Dickson-Anderson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public involvement across health, social care and patient safety: a systematic review of reviews.

Authors:  Josephine Ocloo; Sara Garfield; Bryony Dean Franklin; Shoba Dawson
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2021-01-20

7.  Facilitating health promoting ideas and actions: participatory research in an underserved Swedish residential area.

Authors:  Maria Magnusson; Lisa M Vaughn; Katharina Wretlind; Heléne Bertéus Forslund; Christina Berg
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Impact of a Novel, Low-Cost and Sustainable Health Education Program on the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Intestinal Schistosomiasis in School Children in a Hard-to-Reach District of Madagascar.

Authors:  Stephen A Spencer; Emmanuel H Andriamasy; Cortland Linder; James M StJ Penney; Jemima Henstridge-Blows; Hannah J Russell; Kate Hyde; Caitlin Sheehy; Isla L Young; Benedicte Sjoflot; Daniel A L Rakotomampianina; Anjara M Nandimbiniaina; Gina U Raderalazasoa; Tahiry N Ranaivoson; Antsa Andrianiaina; Rasolofomanana S M Michèle; Zafera A Rohe; Amaya L Bustinduy; J Russell Stothard; Sheena M Cruickshank; Glenn T Edosoa; Alain M Rahetilahy
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 9.  The Opportunity of Social Ecological Resilience in the Promotion of Youth Health and Wellbeing: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Lisa M Vaughn; Melissa DeJonckheere
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2021-03-31

10.  A culture of care: How Lotus House Women's Shelter heals program participants through genuineness, space, high expectations, dignity, individualized attention, and community.

Authors:  Asia A Eaton; Dionne P Stephens; Yanet Ruvalcaba; Jasmine Banks
Journal:  J Community Psychol       Date:  2021-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.