Literature DB >> 29511516

Enantioselective synthesis of bicyclo[3.n.1]alkanes by chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed desymmetrizing Michael cyclizations.

Alan R Burns1,2, Amaël G E Madec2, Darryl W Low1, Iain D Roy1, Hon Wai Lam1,2.   

Abstract

2,2-Disubstituted cyclic 1,3-diketones containing a tethered electron-deficient alkene undergo chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed desymmetrizing Michael cyclizations to give bridged bicyclic products in high enantioselectivities. Both bicyclo[3.2.1]octanes and bicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes are accessible using this methodology.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 29511516      PMCID: PMC5659222          DOI: 10.1039/c5sc00753d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Sci        ISSN: 2041-6520            Impact factor:   9.825


Bicyclo[3.n.1]alkanes appear in numerous biologically active natural products (selected examples are shown in Fig. 1) and have widespread applications in organic synthesis.1,2 Although many creative approaches for the synthesis of these structures have been devised,1,2 the preparation of enantiomerically enriched chiral bicyclo[3.n.1]alkanes by asymmetric catalysis currently represents only a small fraction of these methods.3,4 In view of the present level of development, increasing the number of available catalytic enantioselective reactions to access these compounds is an important area of research. Herein, we report a new approach for the enantioselective synthesis of bicyclo[3.2.1]octanes and bicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes by chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed Michael cyclizations of 1,3-diones onto tethered electron-deficient alkenes. These reactions give products containing three new stereogenic centers, including an all-carbon quaternary center, resulting from the formal enantioselective, desymmetrizing enolization of 2,2-disubstituted cyclic 1,3-diketones. In addition, these reactions further demonstrate the ability of chiral phosphoric acids to promote transformations of unactivated ketones by enolization, which has so far been relatively underexplored.5
Fig. 1

Natural products containing bicyclo[3.n.1]alkanes.

As part of our interest in the catalytic enantioselective desymmetrization of 2,2-disubstituted cyclic 1,3-diketones,6 we observed that enone dione 1a can undergo an intramolecular Michael addition to form the chiral bicyclo[3.2.1]octane rac-2a under basic conditions.7 For example, treatment of 1a with NaOMe in THF at room temperature gave rac-2a in 81% yield (eqn (1)). Following this result, the development of a catalytic enantioselective variant captured our interest. However, a challenging feature of this reaction that differentiates it from the significant majority of catalytic enantioselective Michael reactions described previously8 is that stereogenicity is first generated in the enolization step, rather than the carboncarbon bond-forming step (Scheme 1).9 Therefore, any chiral catalyst employed has to, at first glance, facilitate the enantioselective, desymmetrizing enolization10 of a 2,2-disubstituted cyclic 1,3-diketone. Due to the two substituents at the prochiral 2-position (methyl versus primary alkyl) possessing very similar steric properties, this task appeared to be far from trivial.
Scheme 1

Asymmetric induction in the formation of 2a.

We hypothesized that a solution to this challenge could be obtained under conditions where enolization of 1a is reversible, potentially enabling rapid interconversion of the enolates A and ent-A. Under such Curtin–Hammett conditions,11 carboncarbon bond formation could then be the enantiodetermining step. Furthermore, it appeared likely that chiral catalysts capable of binding to both the enolate oxygen atom and the enone carbonyl group would increase the energy difference between diastereomeric transition states, thus maximizing the prospects of achieving high enantioselectivities. In the last ten years, chiral Brønsted acids, such as phosphoric acids, have emerged as extremely versatile catalysts for a diverse range of transformations.12–14 In many cases, both the Lewis acidity of the hydroxyl group and the Lewis basicity of the phosphoryl group of the catalyst play key roles in the simultaneous activation of electrophile–nucleophile pairs.13 We were therefore hopeful that chiral phosphoric acids would be suitable bifunctional catalysts for the enantioselective cyclization of 1a, and this indeed turned out to be the case (Table 1).15 For example, heating 1a in the presence of various BINOL-derived phosphoric acids 4a–4d (5 mol%) in toluene at 80 °C for 14–18 h led to complete consumption of 1a to form bicyclo[3.2.1]octane 2a as the major product (Table 1, entries 1–4).16 Small traces of a diastereomeric product 3a,16 in which the phenyl ketone-containing substituent occupies an axial position, were detected by TLC analysis, but the exact diastereomeric ratios could not be determined by 1H NMR analysis due to overlapping signals. Furthermore, promising enantioselectivities were obtained with phosphoric acids 4b–4d containing sterically more hindered aryl groups at the 3,3′-positions (entries 2–4). Catalysts 4b and 4c, possessing 2,4,6-trisubstituted aryl groups, gave the best results (entries 2 and 3). Switching to the H8-BINOL scaffold in catalyst 4e was detrimental (entry 5, compare with entry 2), while the vaulted biaryl-derived phosphoric acid 4f gave a low enantioselectivity (entry 6). Due to its commercial availability and relative ease of synthesis compared with 4c, phosphoric acid 4b (TRIP) was selected for further investigations. Changing the solvent to cyclohexane17 and lowering the reaction temperature to 50 °C gave marginally superior results (entries 7 and 8).
Table 1

Evaluation of catalysts and reaction conditions for the Michael cyclization of 1a


EntryCatalystSolventTemp. (°C)ee b of 2a (%)
1 4a Toluene8028
2 4b Toluene8089
3 4c Toluene8090
4 4d Toluene8076
5 4e Toluene8074
6 4f Toluene8017
7 4b Cyclohexane8090
8 4b Cyclohexane5091

Reactions were conducted using 0.05 mmol of 1a. Complete consumption of 1a was observed in all cases by 1H NMR analysis.

Determined by HPLC on a chiral stationary phase.

Reactions were conducted using 0.05 mmol of 1a. Complete consumption of 1a was observed in all cases by 1H NMR analysis. Determined by HPLC on a chiral stationary phase. With an effective catalyst and solvent identified, the scope of the reaction with respect to the preparation of bicyclo[3.2.1] octanes was investigated (Table 2). The catalyst loading of 4b could be decreased from 5 mol% to 3 mol% without detriment, and the reactions were complete after 24 h. Under these conditions, a range of enone diones 1a–1k underwent Michael cyclizations to give products 2a–2k in generally high yields and with good to high enantioselectivities (86–95% ee).16 The process is compatible with electron-donating (entries 2 and 3) or electron-withdrawing aryl groups (4 and 5) on the enone carbonyl, as well as 2-naphthyl (entries 6 and 7) or tert-butyl groups (entry 8). Additional Lewis basic heteroatoms in heteroarene substituents such as 2-pyridyl, 2-furyl, or 2-thienyl groups were also tolerated (entries 9–11). Finally, replacement of the methyl group at the 2-position of the cyclic 1,3-diketone with an ethyl group did not affect the efficiency of the reaction (entry 12). In some cases, the reactions were highly diastereoselective, and only one product was detected (entries 2, 3, 6–8, 11, and 12). Although small but appreciable quantities of the minor diastereomeric products 3 were also formed in other cases, these were readily separated from the major isomers, the yields of which remained high (entries 1, 4, 5, 9, and 10). The enantiomeric excesses of the minor product were comparable to those of the major product in some cases (entries 1, 4, and 10), but were lower for substrates containing a 3-chlorophenyl or 2-pyridyl group attached to the enone carbonyl (entries 5 and 9). The process is also amenable to being conducted on a gram-scale. For example, the cyclization of 1f (1.00 g, 3.12 mmol) using 1.6 mol% of phosphoric acid 4b gave 2f as the only observable diastereomer in 84% yield and 90% ee after 90 h (entry 7).
Table 2

Enantioselective Michael cyclizations to give bicyclo[3.2.1]octanes


EntryR1R2Major product 2Minor product 3
1MePh 2a 93%, 91% ee 3a 7%, 87% ee
24-MeC6H4 2b 91%, 92% ee 3b b
34-MeOC6H4 2c 92%, 91% ee 3c b
44-ClC6H4 2d 80%, 94% ee 3d 11%, 85% ee
53-ClC6H4 2e 79%, 86% ee 3e 13%, 66% ee
62-Naphthyl 2f 97%, 91% ee 3f b
7 c 2-Naphthyl 2f 84%, 90% ee 3f b
8 t-Bu 2g 96%, 95% ee 3g b
9 d 2-Pyridyl 2h 76%, 87% ee 3h 20%, 29% ee
102-Furyl 2i 80%, 88% ee 3i 17%, 90% ee
112-Thienyl 2j 97%, 92% ee 3j b
 
12EtPh 2k 95%, 93% ee 3k b

The reactions were performed with 1a–k (0.20 mmol) in cyclohexane (2 mL). Yields are of pure isolated single diastereomers. Enantiomeric excesses were determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary phase.

The minor product was not detected.

Conducted using 1f (1.00 g, 3.12 mmol) and 1.6 mol% of 4b in cyclohexane/toluene (4 : 1) at 50 °C for 90 h.

The reaction was conducted in toluene.

The reactions were performed with 1a–k (0.20 mmol) in cyclohexane (2 mL). Yields are of pure isolated single diastereomers. Enantiomeric excesses were determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary phase. The minor product was not detected. Conducted using 1f (1.00 g, 3.12 mmol) and 1.6 mol% of 4b in cyclohexane/toluene (4 : 1) at 50 °C for 90 h. The reaction was conducted in toluene. The synthesis of bicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes 6 with good enantioselectivities is also possible using this methodology (Table 3). As with the corresponding bicyclo[3.2.1]octanes, many of these reactions also resulted in diastereomeric products (Table 3, entries 1, 4–9, and 11–13). In general, the enantiomeric excess of the major products were slightly lower compared with those of the bicyclo[3.2.1] octanes 2 (see Table 2), though interestingly, the minor diastereomers 7 were usually formed in higher enantioselectivities. The process remained broadly tolerant of different (hetero)arenes at the enone carbonyl group, including ortho-substituted phenyl groups (entries 8 and 9). A 4-nitrophenyl ketone led to a more modest enantioselectivity for the major product (entry 6). The reaction was also compatible with an alkyl substituent at the enone carbonyl group that possesses enolizable protons; the cyclization of 5l gave products 6l and 7l in 59% combined yield (entry 12). Again, variation of the substituent at the 2-position of the 1,3-diketone was possible, with allyl (entries 13 and 14), phenyl (entries 15 and 16), and para-methoxyphenyl groups (entries 17 and 18) providing good results. In particular, aryl substituents at the 2-position had a beneficial effect on the enantioselectivity compared with the corresponding methyl-substituted analogues. For example, 6o and 6q were obtained in significantly higher enantioselectivity (94% ee, entries 15 and 17) compared with 6a (82% ee, entry 1).
Table 3

Enantioselective Michael cyclizations to give bicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes


EntryR1R2Major product 6Minor product 7
1MePh 6a 77%, 82% ee 7a 14%, 94% ee
24-MeC6H4 6b 95%, 86% ee 7b b
34-MeOC6H4 6c 94%, 87% ee 7c b
44-FC6H4 6d 82%, 86% ee 7d 13%, 86% ee
54-ClC6H4 6e 73%, 87% ee 7e 19%, 96% ee
6 c 4-NO2C6H4 6f 85%, 72% ee 7f 15%, 88% ee
7 d 3-CF3C6H4 6g 68%, 86% ee 7g 21%, 94% ee
82-MeOC6H4 6h 60%, 83% ee 7h 24%, 93% ee
92-ClC6H4 6i 75%, 92% ee 7i 20%, 85% ee
102-Naphthyl 6j 96%, 87% ee 7j b
112-Pyridyl 6k 75%, 82% ee 7k 19%, 46% ee
12CH2CH2OBn 6l 35%, 92% ee 7l 24%, 80% ee
 
13AllylPh 6m 89%, 86% ee 7m 6%, 94% ee
144-ClC6H4 6n 94%, 88% ee 7n b
 
15PhPh 6o 68%, 94% ee 7o b
162-Thienyl 6p 50%, 97% ee 7p b
 
17PMPPh 6q 63%, 94% ee 7q b
182-Thienyl 6r 49%, 92% ee 7r b

The reactions were performed with 5a–5r (0.20 mmol) in cyclohexane (2 mL). Yields are of pure isolated single diastereomers. Enantiomeric excesses were determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary phase.

The minor product was not detected.

The reaction was conducted in toluene.

The reaction was conducted in cyclohexane (4 mL). PMP = para-methoxyphenyl.

The reactions were performed with 5a–5r (0.20 mmol) in cyclohexane (2 mL). Yields are of pure isolated single diastereomers. Enantiomeric excesses were determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary phase. The minor product was not detected. The reaction was conducted in toluene. The reaction was conducted in cyclohexane (4 mL). PMP = para-methoxyphenyl. The process is not limited to α,β-unsaturated ketones as the Michael acceptor. For example, substrate 8, containing an α,β-unsaturated amide, successfully underwent cyclization to give bicyclo[3.3.1]nonane 9 in 52% yield and 77% ee, with the starting material being recovered in 40% yield (eqn (2)). Due to the lower reactivity of 8 compared with α,β-unsaturated ketones, a higher catalyst loading, temperature, and reaction time were required for reasonable results. Interestingly, the benzyl ester analogue of 8, in which the alkene is expected to be more electrophilic than in 8, was unreactive towards chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed Michael cyclizations. This observation suggests that in addition to the electrophilicity of the electron-deficient alkene, the Lewis basicity of the oxygen atom of the α,β-unsaturated carbonyl (to facilitate binding of the chiral phosphoric acid) is also important for reactivity. Furthermore, the 2-alkenylbenzoxazole-containing substrate 10 also underwent cyclization in a good yield (eqn (3)) although the enantioselectivity of this reaction was modest (62% ee).18 Scheme 2 presents a working hypothesis for the mode of action of the chiral phosphoric acid 4b, using substrate 1a for illustration. We propose that the catalyst promotes reversible keto-enol tautomerization of 1a,5 and is able to simultaneously bind the carbonyl group of the electrophilic enone and the hydroxyl group of the nucleophilic enol. The formation of the enantiomers 2a and ent-2a of the major product can be explained by chair-like conformations B and C, respectively, in which the enone occupies a pseudoequatorial position. The preferential formation of 2a is consistent with cyclization through conformation B being favored, in which the enol attacks the Si-face of the alkene.19 The formation of the two enantiomers 3a and ent-3a of the minor product can be explained by conformations D and E, where the enone occupies a pseudoaxial position. Again, attack of the Si-face of the alkene is favored (conformation D), leading to the preferential formation of 3a.19 This model is similar to one proposed by List and co-workers to explain the mode of enantioinduction in asymmetric chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed Fischer indolizations.20
Scheme 2

Proposed mode of action of catalyst 4b.

Preliminary kinetic studies were also performed on the cyclization of 5d into 6d and 7d in toluene-d8 using different concentrations of catalyst 4b. From these experiments, the order of the reaction with respect to 4b was calculated to be 0.66.21 This non-integer value confirms the mechanism of the reaction is indeed complex, and may involve a series of equilibria as presented in Scheme 2. The complexity of the mechanism was further confirmed by a reaction in which the enantiomeric excess of 2j was measured during the course of the cyclization; the ee of 2j was not constant throughout, and increased from 70% ee after 1 h (15% conversion) to 90% ee after 24 h (75% conversion).21,22 Rationalization of these observations awaits the results of further studies. In summary, the enantioselective synthesis of bicyclo[3.2.1]octanes and bicyclo[3.3.1]nonanes has been achieved by the chiral phosphoric acid-catalyzed Michael cyclizations of enone diones. These reactions involve the unusual enantioselective desymmetrization of 2,2-disubstituted cyclic 1,3-diketones, in which the bifunctional activation of the substrate by the catalyst is likely to be critical for success. This work further demonstrates the utility of chiral Brønsted acids in the enantioselective preparation of stereochemically complex structures, and investigation of these catalysts in other desymmetrization processes are likely to result in further advances in future. These studies, along with further mechanistic experiments, are topics for future study in our group. Click here for additional data file. Click here for additional data file.
  51 in total

1.  Enantioselective synthesis of bicylco[3.2.1]octan-8-ones using a tandem Michael-Henry reaction.

Authors:  Derong Ding; Cong-Gui Zhao; Qunsheng Guo; Hadi Arman
Journal:  Tetrahedron       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 2.457

2.  Asymmetric organocatalytic domino Michael/aldol reactions: enantioselective synthesis of chiral cycloheptanones, tetrahydrochromenones, and polyfunctionalized bicyclo[3.2.1]octanes.

Authors:  Magnus Rueping; Alexander Kuenkel; Francisco Tato; Jan W Bats
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Catalytic, enantioselective vinylogous Michael reactions.

Authors:  Christoph Schneider; Falko Abels
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 4.  Domino reactions for the synthesis of bridged bicyclic frameworks: fast access to bicyclo[n.3.1]alkanes.

Authors:  Miriam Ruiz; Pilar López-Alvarado; Giorgio Giorgi; J Carlos Menéndez
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 54.564

5.  Stereoselective intermolecular formal [3+3] cycloaddition reaction of cyclic enamines and enones.

Authors:  Mohammad Movassaghi; Bin Chen
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  One-pot organocatalytic enantioselective Michael-Michael-aldol-Henry reaction cascade. A facile entry to the steroid system with six contiguous stereogenic centers.

Authors:  Dai-Huei Jhuo; Bor-Cherng Hong; Chun-Wei Chang; Gene-Hsiang Lee
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 6.005

7.  Brønsted acid catalyzed asymmetric aldol reaction: a complementary approach to enamine catalysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Pousse; Fabien Le Cavelier; Luke Humphreys; Jacques Rouden; Jérôme Blanchet
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 6.005

8.  Enantioselective synthesis of nicotinic receptor probe 7,8-difluoro-1,2,3,4,5,6- hexahydro-1,5-methano-3-benzazocine.

Authors:  Crystal G Bashore; Michael G Vetelino; Michael C Wirtz; Paige R Brooks; Heather N Frost; Ruth E McDermott; David C Whritenour; John A Ragan; Jennifer L Rutherford; Teresa W Makowski; Steven J Brenek; Jotham W Coe
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 6.005

9.  Chiral Brønsted acid-catalyzed direct Mannich reactions via electrophilic activation.

Authors:  Daisuke Uraguchi; Masahiro Terada
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  C═N-containing azaarenes as activating groups in enantioselective catalysis.

Authors:  Daniel Best; Hon Wai Lam
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.354

View more
  3 in total

1.  Catalytic Asymmetric Reactions of 4-Substituted Indoles with Nitroethene: A Direct Entry to Ergot Alkaloid Structures.

Authors:  Simone Romanini; Emilio Galletti; Lorenzo Caruana; Andrea Mazzanti; Fahmi Himo; Stefano Santoro; Mariafrancesca Fochi; Luca Bernardi
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.236

2.  Asymmetric addition of α-branched cyclic ketones to allenamides catalyzed by a chiral phosphoric acid.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Yang; F Dean Toste
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 9.825

3.  Constructing chiral bicyclo[3.2.1]octanes via palladium-catalyzed asymmetric tandem Heck/carbonylation desymmetrization of cyclopentenes.

Authors:  Zhenbo Yuan; Yuye Zeng; Ziwen Feng; Zhe Guan; Aijun Lin; Hequan Yao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 14.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.