Literature DB >> 29510030

What is the Best Biological Process for Nitrogen Removal: When and Why?

Perry L McCarty1.   

Abstract

Many different aerobic and anaerobic biological processes and treatment schemes are available for transforming organics and/or removing nitrogen from domestic wastewaters. Significant reductions in oxygen requirements and absence of a need for organics for nitrogen reduction are often indicated as advantageous for using the newer anammox organism approach for nitrogen removal rather than the traditional nitrification/denitrification method, the most common one in use today. However, treatment schemes differ, and there are some in which such suggested advantages may not hold. When nitrification/denitrification is used, an anoxic tank is now commonly used first and the nitrate formed by nitrification later is recycled back to that tank for oxidation of wastewater organics. This greatly reduces oxygen requirements and the need for adding organics. So when are such claims correct and when not? What factors in wastewater composition, regulatory requirements, and treatment flow sheet alter which treatment process is best to use? As an aid in making such judgments under different circumstances, the stoichiometry of the different biological processes involved and the different treatment approaches used were determined and compared. Advantages of each as well as imitations and potential opportunities for research to prevent them are presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29510030     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b05832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  8 in total

1.  Metagenomes from 25 Low-Abundance Microbes in a Partial Nitritation Anammox Microbiome.

Authors:  Natalie K Beach; Kevin S Myers; Timothy J Donohue; Daniel R Noguera
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 2.  Recent advancements in the biological treatment of high strength ammonia wastewater.

Authors:  Evan Ronan; Hussain Aqeel; Gideon M Wolfaardt; Steven N Liss
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-08-22       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Cultivating river sediments into efficient denitrifying sludge for treating municipal wastewater.

Authors:  Liangang Hou; Jun Li; Zhaoming Zheng; Qi Sun; Yitao Liu; Kai Zhang
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Comparative genomics in "Candidatus Kuenenia stuttgartiensis" reveal high genomic plasticity in the overall genome structure, CRISPR loci and surface proteins.

Authors:  Chang Ding; Lorenz Adrian
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Metagenomic insights into mixotrophic denitrification facilitated nitrogen removal in a full-scale A2/O wastewater treatment plant.

Authors:  Shulei Liu; Yasong Chen; Lin Xiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  River Biofilms Microbiome and Resistome Responses to Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluents Containing Antibiotics.

Authors:  Olha Matviichuk; Leslie Mondamert; Claude Geffroy; Margaux Gaschet; Christophe Dagot; Jérôme Labanowski
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Influence of cerium oxide nanoparticles on dairy effluent nitrate and phosphate bioremediation.

Authors:  Abeer M Salama; Moktar S Behaery; Amira E Abd Elaal; Ahmed Abdelaal
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Changes in the Species and Functional Composition of Activated Sludge Communities Revealed Mechanisms of Partial Nitrification Established by Ultrasonication.

Authors:  Yu Xue; Min Zheng; Shuang Wu; Yanchen Liu; Xia Huang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.064

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.