Literature DB >> 35575561

Metagenomes from 25 Low-Abundance Microbes in a Partial Nitritation Anammox Microbiome.

Natalie K Beach1,2, Kevin S Myers3,4, Timothy J Donohue3,4,5, Daniel R Noguera1,3,4.   

Abstract

Microbial communities using anammox bacteria to remove nitrogen are increasingly important in wastewater treatment. We report on 25 metagenome-assembled genomes of low-abundance microbes from a partial nitritation anammox bioreactor system that have not been described previously. These data add to the body of information about this important wastewater treatment system.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35575561      PMCID: PMC9202391          DOI: 10.1128/mra.00212-22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Processes utilizing anammox bacteria for nitrogen removal have become popular for energy-saving wastewater treatment since they do not require oxygen or organic carbon for growth to convert ammonium (NH4+) and nitrite (NO2−) directly to nitrogen gas (N2) (1–7). Microorganisms in partial nitritation anammox (PNA) bioreactors adapt to repetitive and rapidly changing microaerobic and anoxic environments (5). The most abundant and active functional groups involved in nitrogen cycling in PNA systems are anammox bacteria, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria, and some of the strains appear to be ubiquitous (8, 9); we are beginning to realize the extent of the metabolic versatility and interactions within these microbiomes (8–10). We reported on metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) of the most abundant and active microorganisms in a laboratory-scale PNA bioreactor treating reject water from a full-scale struvite recovery process (11). There, the bioreactor was inoculated with biomass from the York River Treatment Plant (Hampton Roads Sewerage District, Seaford, VA), which uses a PNA deammonification process to treat reject water from the solids dewatering facility (12). This announcement includes 25 low-abundance MAGs with greater than 68% completion, grouped into 16 clusters, that were recovered from the same laboratory-scale PNA bioreactor and for which a specific role in the community has not been described (Table 1). These additional MAGs add to the expanding body of knowledge about microorganisms present in deammonification bioreactors at low abundance (e.g., each less than 1% based on DNA sequencing coverage and collectively less than 5%, determined as described previously [11, 13]).
TABLE 1

MAG statistics and genome accession numbers

MAG identificationGenBank accession no.GTDB taxonomyCompleteness (%)Contamination (%)Genome size (bp)No. of scaffoldsN50 (bp)GC content (%)Sequencing depth (×)No. of tRNAsNo. of 5S rRNAsNo. of 16S rRNAsNo. of 23S rRNAs
BCT_39 JAJVIC000000000 Bacteroidia bacterium99.523.024,874,62555472,99442.538745222
BAC_79R JAJVIK000000000 Bacterium98.884.495,858,27132291,82161.521552001
GAM_9R JAJVIQ000000000 Gammaproteobacteria bacterium97.622.413,557,06939193,30266.553249100
BAC_63R JAJVIF000000000 Bacterium97.2203,260,76441,880,75862.821748111
TMB_89R JAJVIN000000000 Thermoanaerobaculia bacterium97.010.856,170,92969148,42265.821648111
BAC_38 JAJVIB000000000 Bacterium95.541.17,631,06845347,64458.9512648111
ELM_99 JAJVIP000000000 Elusimicrobia bacterium95.5103,644,17843213,84548.713076111
PCS_19R JAJVHX000000000 Phycisphaerae bacterium95.451.143,568,26428220,15355.422148011
OMN_62 JAJVIE000000000 Omnitrophota bacterium95.1602,713,171251,594,12861.883348111
PCS_14R JAJVHU000000000 Phycisphaerae bacterium94.891.144,668,78770104,85265.745249011
VRM_23R JAJVHY000000000 Verrucomicrobiae bacterium94.593.074,819,19536167,25159.691850111
PCS_76R JAJVII000000000 Phycisphaerae bacterium94.320.575,487,51472107,02567.821654111
PCS_15R JAJVHV000000000 Phycisphaerae bacterium93.181.75,249,57850159,78667.135961011
ANL_81R JAJVIM000000000 Anaerolineae bacterium92.732.187,867,78360252,90457.361348111
PCL_122_1R JAJVHS000000000 Phycisphaerales bacterium92.610.574,404,07910458,56267.83100000
PSM_69 JAJVIG000000000 Pseudomonadales bacterium91.160.863,834,2766684,48968.462946000
GAM_33 JAJVHZ000000000 Gammaproteobacteria bacterium89.293.484,271,28112864,53664.034552100
MYX_71R JAJVIH000000000 Myxococcota bacterium89.030.653,968,8787877,58063.121144110
RDC_77 JAJVIJ000000000 Rhodocyclaceae bacterium88.030.212,815,2546757,54864.681839000
PLM_90R JAJVIO000000000 Planctomycetota bacterium85.881.144,250,4019161,97664.89965011
PYM_42R JAJVID000000000 Pyrinomonadales bacterium85.471.716,468,66822138,09657.89072111
ANL_34 JAJVIA000000000 Anaerolineae bacterium77.450.913,991,43314133,93156.334938000
BAC_13 JAJVHT000000000 Bacterium76.3104,595,93223122,64953.054436111
PLM_16R JAJVHW000000000 Planctomycetota bacterium75.572.843,864,19017425,69672.14251111
BRK_7R JAJVIL000000000 Burkholderiaceae bacterium69.090.292,770,38415418,43569.491839000
MAG statistics and genome accession numbers Genomic DNA was extracted at multiple time points during operation of the bioreactor (days 77, 231, 350, and 454) using a modified phenol-chloroform method (11). The quality of the isolated DNA was determined using a Qubit 4 fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and gel electrophoresis. Sequencing libraries were prepared using the TruSeq DNA PCR-free kit (Illumina, CA, USA) following the standard protocol as described (14), samples were sequenced on the HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Biotechnology Center using 2 × 250-bp reads, and low-quality reads (quality scores of less than 20 and sequence lengths of less than 100 bp) were removed using Sickle (15). A total of 18,106,239 reads from the metagenomic samples were processed with default parameters as described previously (11), using SPAdes v3.3.0 (16) for assembly, Anvi’o v5.5.0 (17) for binning, BBMap v38.22 (18) for mapping, Prodigal v2.6.3 (19), HMMER v3.2.1 (20), and NCBI Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) (21) for annotation, and ProDeGe v2.2 (22) and tetranucleotide frequency comparisons for further cleaning of the MAGs. Genome statistics were determined with CheckM v1.0.3 (23), and taxonomy was assigned with GTDB-Tk v1.5.1 (database release 202) (24). The unrooted phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) comparing these MAGs with MAGs from previous studies (8, 9) was generated using RAxML-NG v0.9.0 (25) and visualized with TreeViewer (https://treeviewer.org). These MAGs add to our understanding of PNA bioreactors and may aid in optimization of these systems once the function of these low-abundant microbes is elucidated.
FIG 1

Phylogenetic tree of the 25 MAGs from this study (labeled NB2 and bolded), compared with the 16 most abundant MAGs from Beach et al. from the same microbiome (labeled NB) (11), as well as MAGs from Speth et al. (labeled OLB) (8) and Lawson et al. (labeled UWM) (9). The tree was constructed with RAxML-NG (unrooted) (25) with the 120 bacterial single-copy marker genes from GTDB-Tk (24) and visualized with TreeViewer (https://treeviewer.org). GTDB phylum taxonomy is listed on the right. Bootstrap values of more than 50 are shown. The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per sequence site. Strain codes for NB and NB2 strains are as follows: AMX, Brocadia; ANL, Anaerolineae; ANR, Anaerolineales; BAC, bacterium; BCT, Bacteroidia; BRB, Bryobacteraceae; BRK, Burkholderiaceae; ELM, Elusimicrobia; FLB, Flavobacteriales; GAM, Gammaproteobacteria; IGV, Ignavibacteria; MYX, Myxococcota; NSM, Nitrosomonas; NSP, Nitrospira; OMN, Omnitrophota; PCL, Phycisphaerales; PCS, Phycisphaerae; PLM, Planctomycetota; PSM, Pseudomonadales; PYM, Pyrinomonadales; RDC, Rhodocyclaceae; SPS, Saprospiraceae; STB, Steroidobacteraceae; TMB, Thermoanaerobaculia; VRM, Verrucomicrobiae; XAM, Xanthomonadales.

Phylogenetic tree of the 25 MAGs from this study (labeled NB2 and bolded), compared with the 16 most abundant MAGs from Beach et al. from the same microbiome (labeled NB) (11), as well as MAGs from Speth et al. (labeled OLB) (8) and Lawson et al. (labeled UWM) (9). The tree was constructed with RAxML-NG (unrooted) (25) with the 120 bacterial single-copy marker genes from GTDB-Tk (24) and visualized with TreeViewer (https://treeviewer.org). GTDB phylum taxonomy is listed on the right. Bootstrap values of more than 50 are shown. The scale bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions per sequence site. Strain codes for NB and NB2 strains are as follows: AMX, Brocadia; ANL, Anaerolineae; ANR, Anaerolineales; BAC, bacterium; BCT, Bacteroidia; BRB, Bryobacteraceae; BRK, Burkholderiaceae; ELM, Elusimicrobia; FLB, Flavobacteriales; GAM, Gammaproteobacteria; IGV, Ignavibacteria; MYX, Myxococcota; NSM, Nitrosomonas; NSP, Nitrospira; OMN, Omnitrophota; PCL, Phycisphaerales; PCS, Phycisphaerae; PLM, Planctomycetota; PSM, Pseudomonadales; PYM, Pyrinomonadales; RDC, Rhodocyclaceae; SPS, Saprospiraceae; STB, Steroidobacteraceae; TMB, Thermoanaerobaculia; VRM, Verrucomicrobiae; XAM, Xanthomonadales.

Data availability.

Raw metagenomic sequence data and MAGs are available in NCBI GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA559529. All custom scripts are available at GitHub (https://github.com/GLBRC/metagenome_analysis).
  21 in total

Review 1.  Anammox--growth physiology, cell biology, and metabolism.

Authors:  Boran Kartal; Laura van Niftrik; Jan T Keltjens; Huub J M Op den Camp; Mike S M Jetten
Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.517

Review 2.  Biological nitrogen removal from sewage via anammox: Recent advances.

Authors:  Bin Ma; Shanyun Wang; Shenbin Cao; Yuanyuan Miao; Fangxu Jia; Rui Du; Yongzhen Peng
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 9.642

3.  Integration of the Anammox process to the rejection water and main stream lines of WWTPs.

Authors:  Nicolás Morales; Ángeles Val Del Río; José Ramón Vázquez-Padín; Ramón Méndez; Anuska Mosquera-Corral; José Luis Campos
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database.

Authors:  Michael Y Galperin; Kira S Makarova; Yuri I Wolf; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Anaerobic oxidation of ammonium is a biologically mediated process.

Authors:  A A van de Graaf; A Mulder; P de Bruijn; M S Jetten; L A Robertson; J G Kuenen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Accelerated Profile HMM Searches.

Authors:  Sean R Eddy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  ProDeGe: a computational protocol for fully automated decontamination of genomes.

Authors:  Kristin Tennessen; Evan Andersen; Scott Clingenpeel; Christian Rinke; Derek S Lundberg; James Han; Jeff L Dangl; Natalia Ivanova; Tanja Woyke; Nikos Kyrpides; Amrita Pati
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Genome-Enabled Insights into the Ecophysiology of the Comammox Bacterium "Candidatus Nitrospira nitrosa".

Authors:  Pamela Y Camejo; Jorge Santo Domingo; Katherine D McMahon; Daniel R Noguera
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.496

10.  Genome-based microbial ecology of anammox granules in a full-scale wastewater treatment system.

Authors:  Daan R Speth; Michiel H In 't Zandt; Simon Guerrero-Cruz; Bas E Dutilh; Mike S M Jetten
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.