Literature DB >> 29508011

Imaging with ultrasound contrast agents: current status and future.

Wui K Chong1, Virginie Papadopoulou2, Paul A Dayton3,2.   

Abstract

Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) were recently approved by the Food and Drug administration for non-cardiac imaging. The physical principles of UCAs, methods of administration, dosage, adverse effects, and imaging techniques both current and future are described. UCAs consist of microbubbles in suspension which strongly interact with the ultrasound beam and are readily detectable by ultrasound imaging systems. They are confined to the blood pool when administered intravenously, unlike iodinated and gadolinium contrast agents. UCAs have a proven safety record based on over two decades of use, during which they have been used in echocardiography in the U.S. and for non-cardiac imaging in the rest of the world. Adverse effects are less common with UCAs than CT/MR contrast agents. Compared to CT and MR, contrast-enhanced ultrasound has the advantages of real-time imaging, portability, and reduced susceptibility to metal and motion artifact. UCAs are not nephrotoxic and can be used in renal failure. High acoustic amplitudes can cause microbubbles to fragment in a manner that can result in short-term increases in capillary permeability or capillary rupture. These bioeffects can be beneficial and have been used to enhance drug delivery under appropriate conditions. Imaging with a mechanical index of < 0.4 preserves the microbubbles and is not typically associated with substantial bioeffects. Molecularly targeted ultrasound contrast agents are created by conjugating the microbubble shell with a peptide, antibody, or other ligand designed to target an endothelial biomarker associated with tumor angiogenesis or inflammation. These microbubbles then accumulate in the microvasculature at target sites where they can be imaged. Ultrasound contrast agents are a valuable addition to the diagnostic imaging toolkit. They will facilitate cross-sectional abdominal imaging in situations where contrast-enhanced CT and MR are contraindicated or impractical.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microbubble; Review; Ultrasound contrast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29508011     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1516-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)


  35 in total

Review 1.  Portal pressure monitoring-state-of-the-art and future perspective.

Authors:  Gang Xu; Fei Li; Yilei Mao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

2.  Preserving the Integrity of Surfactant-Stabilized Microbubble Membranes for Localized Oxygen Delivery.

Authors:  Brian E Oeffinger; Purva Vaidya; Iman Ayaz; Rawan Shraim; John R Eisenbrey; Margaret A Wheatley
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.882

3.  Ultrasound multiple scattering with microbubbles can differentiate between tumor and healthy tissue in vivo.

Authors:  Kaustav Mohanty; Virginie Papadopoulou; Isabel G Newsome; Sarah Shelton; Paul A Dayton; Marie Muller
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Perspective on ultrasound bioeffects and possible implications for continuous post-dive monitoring safety.

Authors:  Erica P McCune; David Q Le; Peter Lindholm; Kathryn R Nightingale; Paul A Dayton; Virginie Papadopoulou
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 1.228

5.  Evaluation on Effect of Acupoint Application to Treat Idiopathic Edema of Perimenopausal Women Using the Segmentation Dictionary Learning Algorithm.

Authors:  Jinfeng Li; Jiao Wang; Wenxia Zhao; Pei Wang; Min Li
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27

6.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Monitoring Non-surgical Treatments of Uterine Fibroids: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mehnoosh Torkzaban; Priscilla Machado; Ipshita Gupta; Yang Hai; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Assessing Polycystic Kidney Disease in Rodents: Comparison of Robotic 3D Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Nathan J Beaumont; Heather L Holmes; Adriana V Gregory; Marie E Edwards; Juan D Rojas; Ryan C Gessner; Paul A Dayton; Timothy L Kline; Michael F Romero; Tomasz J Czernuszewicz
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2020-10-29

8.  Design Considerations to Facilitate Clinical Radiological Evaluation of Implantable Biomedical Structures.

Authors:  Kendell M Pawelec; Shatadru Chakravarty; Jeremy M L Hix; Karen L Perry; Lodewijk van Holsbeeck; Ryan Fajardo; Erik M Shapiro
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 9.  Ultrasound contrast agents: microbubbles made simple for the pediatric radiologist.

Authors:  Anush Sridharan; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg; Norbert Lorenz; Ludwig Steffgen; Aikaterini Ntoulia
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-06-12

10.  Predicting Long-Term Hepatocellular Carcinoma Response to Transarterial Radioembolization Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: Initial Experiences.

Authors:  Lauren J Delaney; Mohamed Tantawi; Corinne E Wessner; Priscilla Machado; Flemming Forsberg; Andrej Lyshchik; Patrick O'Kane; Ji-Bin Liu; Jesse Civan; Allison Tan; Kevin Anton; Colette M Shaw; John R Eisenbrey
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-06-13       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.