Literature DB >> 29507349

Anti-CRISPR proteins encoded by archaeal lytic viruses inhibit subtype I-D immunity.

Fei He1, Yuvaraj Bhoobalan-Chitty1, Lan B Van2, Anders L Kjeldsen1, Matteo Dedola1, Kira S Makarova3, Eugene V Koonin3, Ditlev E Brodersen2, Xu Peng4.   

Abstract

Viruses employ a range of strategies to counteract the prokaryotic adaptive immune system, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas), including mutational escape and physical blocking of enzymatic function using anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs). Acrs have been found in many bacteriophages but so far not in archaeal viruses, despite the near ubiquity of CRISPR-Cas systems in archaea. Here, we report the functional and structural characterization of two archaeal Acrs from the lytic rudiviruses, SIRV2 and SIRV3. We show that a 4 kb deletion in the SIRV2 genome dramatically reduces infectivity in Sulfolobus islandicus LAL14/1 that carries functional CRISPR-Cas subtypes I-A, I-D and III-B. Subsequent insertion of a single gene from SIRV3, gp02 (AcrID1), which is conserved in the deleted fragment, successfully restored infectivity. We demonstrate that AcrID1 protein inhibits the CRISPR-Cas subtype I-D system by interacting directly with Cas10d protein, which is required for the interference stage. Sequence and structural analysis of AcrID1 show that it belongs to a conserved family of compact, dimeric αβ-sandwich proteins characterized by extreme pH and temperature stability and a tendency to form protein fibres. We identify about 50 homologues of AcrID1 in four archaeal viral families demonstrating the broad distribution of this group of anti-CRISPR proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29507349     DOI: 10.1038/s41564-018-0120-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Microbiol        ISSN: 2058-5276            Impact factor:   17.745


  46 in total

1.  New virus isolates from Italian hydrothermal environments underscore the biogeographic pattern in archaeal virus communities.

Authors:  Diana P Baquero; Patrizia Contursi; Monica Piochi; Simonetta Bartolucci; Ying Liu; Virginija Cvirkaite-Krupovic; David Prangishvili; Mart Krupovic
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Structural insight into multistage inhibition of CRISPR-Cas12a by AcrVA4.

Authors:  Ruchao Peng; Zhiteng Li; Ying Xu; Shaoshuai He; Qi Peng; Lian-Ao Wu; Ying Wu; Jianxun Qi; Peiyi Wang; Yi Shi; George F Gao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Structure-based functional mechanisms and biotechnology applications of anti-CRISPR proteins.

Authors:  Ning Jia; Dinshaw J Patel
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  Structures and Strategies of Anti-CRISPR-Mediated Immune Suppression.

Authors:  Tanner Wiegand; Shweta Karambelkar; Joseph Bondy-Denomy; Blake Wiedenheft
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 15.500

5.  CRISPR-Cas13 Inhibitors Block RNA Editing in Bacteria and Mammalian Cells.

Authors:  Ping Lin; Shugang Qin; Qinqin Pu; Zhihan Wang; Qun Wu; Pan Gao; Jacob Schettler; Kai Guo; Rongpeng Li; Guoping Li; Canhua Huang; Yuquan Wei; George Fu Gao; Jianxin Jiang; Min Wu
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 6.  Three New Cs for CRISPR: Collateral, Communicate, Cooperate.

Authors:  Andrew Varble; Luciano A Marraffini
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Specificities and functional coordination between the two Cas6 maturation endonucleases in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120 assign orphan CRISPR arrays to three groups.

Authors:  Viktoria Reimann; Marcus Ziemann; Hui Li; Tao Zhu; Juliane Behler; Xuefeng Lu; Wolfgang R Hess
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 8.  Mechanisms of Type I-E and I-F CRISPR-Cas Systems in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Chaoyou Xue; Dipali G Sashital
Journal:  EcoSal Plus       Date:  2019-02

9.  Bacteriophage Cooperation Suppresses CRISPR-Cas3 and Cas9 Immunity.

Authors:  Adair L Borges; Jenny Y Zhang; MaryClare F Rollins; Beatriz A Osuna; Blake Wiedenheft; Joseph Bondy-Denomy
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Machine learning predicts new anti-CRISPR proteins.

Authors:  Simon Eitzinger; Amina Asif; Kyle E Watters; Anthony T Iavarone; Gavin J Knott; Jennifer A Doudna; Fayyaz Ul Amir Afsar Minhas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.