| Literature DB >> 29506532 |
Dongliang Li1, Yongjian Zhang2, He Zhang1, Chao Zhan2, Xin Li3, Tu Ba4, Zini Qiu1, Fang E1, Guixiang Lv1, Chendan Zou1, Chuxuan Wang1, Lining Si1,5, Chaoxia Zou6,7, Qiang Li8, Xu Gao9,10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cell adhesion molecules (CADMs) comprise of a protein family whose functions include maintenance of cell polarity and tumor suppression. Hypo-expression of CADM2 gene expression has been observed in several cancers including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the role and mechanisms of CADM2 in HCC remain unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Cell adhesion molecule 2; Epithelial-mesenchymal transition; Hepatocellular carcinoma; MicroRNA-10b; Tumor metastasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29506532 PMCID: PMC5836378 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-018-0699-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Fig. 1Lower expression of CADM2 was observed in HCC samples. a Analysis GEO data (GSE27150) of CADM2 expression levels in HCC and adjacent normal tissues (n = 57). b Kaplan-Meier analysis of median overall survival of patients with different CADM2 expression Kaplan-Meier analysis of median overall survival of patients with different CADM2 expression levels from GEO database (GSE27150, P = 0.0757, Red: High expression CADM2, Blue: Low expression CADM2). c Analysis GEO data (GDS3091) of CADM2 expression levels in HCC patients with venous metastasis (n = 9) and without venous metastasis (n = 11) from GEO data (GDS3091) were analyzed. d Relative CADM2 expression levels in HCC samples were detected by qRT-PCR. (n = 36, P = 0.0226). e CADM2 expression in HCC samples was examined using western blotting. GAPDH was used as a loading control. f qRT-PCR for detecting CADM2 mRNA expression levels in several liver cell lines as indicted. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01)
Fig. 2Dysregulated of CADM2 mediated HCC cell migration and invasion. a-b Representative results of Wound-healing assays (P = 0.0008) and Transwell assays (for migration P = 0.0054, for invasion P = 0.0011) showed the effect of CADM2 expression on the migratory abilities and invasion of HCC cells. Column charts represent mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Error bars represent SD. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001) (c). Expression of EMT markers in HepG2 cells transfected with pEX-CADM2 or pEX-NC were examined by immunofluorescence. (Red: Vimentin, Green: E-cadherin, Blue: DAPI) (d). Western blotting analysis of indicated proteins in Hep3B cells transfected with pEX-CADM2 or pEX-NC. GAPDH was used as a loading control
Fig. 3MiR-10b directly targets CADM2 3′-UTR. a-b The mRNA and protein levels of CADM2 were determined by qRT-PCR and Western blotting after transfection with miR-10b mimic, NC mimic, miR-10b inhibitor, NC inhibitor in HEK293T cells. U6 or GAPDH were used as a loading control. c The predicted targeting sites of CADM2 3′-UTR binding to miR-10b were shown. MUT1: the first binding site was mutated; MUT2: the second binding site was mutated). d HEK-293T cells were co-transfected with wild-type 3′-UTR (WT) or mutant-type 3′-UTR (MUT1 and MUT2) reporters and NC mimic or miR-10b mimic. In the experiments shown in the panels, luciferase/Renilla activity was measured (P = 0.0459). The results are means ± SEM of three independent experiments. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01)
Fig. 4MiR-10b promoted EMT process in HCC cell lines. a Expression of EMT markers in HepG2 cells transfected with miR-10b mimic, miR-10b inhibitor or its corresponding control were examined by immunofluorescence. (Green: E-cadherin, Red: Vimentin, Blue: DAPI) (b). E-cadherin and Vimentin expression were analyzed by Western blotting in HepG2 cells transfected with miR-10b mimic, miR-10b inhibitor or its corresponding control, GAPDH was used as a loading control. c A wound-healing assay was performed using HepG2 cells, and the photos were taken at 0 h and 48 h. d The Transwell assays with and without matrigel were performed in three HCC cell lines transfected miR-10b mimic, miR-10b inhibitor or its corresponding control. Representative photos for HepG2, Hep3B, Huh7 cells and quantitative analysis only for HepG2 are shown. Data represents mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Error bars represent SD. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)
Fig. 5Correlation between CADM2 and miR-10b in human HCC samples. a Relative miR-10b expression levels in HCC samples. b qRT-PCR for detecting miR-10b expression levels in several HCC cell lines and normal liver cell line as indicted. c The expression of miR-10b in cancerous tissues and matched normal tissues from TCGA (P = 3.01e-15). d Kaplan-Meier analysis of over-all survival of patients with different miR-10b expression level (P = 0.0127). e The Spearman’s correlation analysis between miR-10b expression and CADM2 expression in HCC samples (P = 0.0054). f The relationship between miR-10b expression and CADM2 protein expression was analyzed using Fisher exact test (P = 0.039). Data represents mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Error bars represent SD. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01)
Fig. 6FAK/AKT pathway mediates the effect of miR-10b/CADM2 in HCC metastasis. a Western blotting analysis of indicated proteins in Hep3B cells transfected with pEX-CADM2 or pEX-NC. b Hep3B cells were co-transfected with miR-10b mimic (or NC mimic) and pEX-CADM2 (or pEX-NC). The expression of CADM2, FAK and EMT markers were detected by Western blotting. c Treatment with LY294002 reversed EMT mediated by miR-10b overexpression. GAPDH was used as a loading control. d The cells transfected as in Fig. 6c were used to perform Transwell assays. e Schematic representation of CADM2 actions in HCCs. Data represents mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. Error bars represent SD. (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001)