| Literature DB >> 29506507 |
Mohammed Shahait1, Samer Nassif2, Hani Tamim3, Deborah Mukherji3, Maya Hijazi2, Marwan El Sabban4, Raja Khauli1, Muhammad Bulbul1, Wassim Abou Kheir4, Albert El Hajj5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Positive surgical margin (PSM) is a predictor of biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Attempts to stratify PSM based on linear length, Gleason score, location and number have failed to add to predictive models using margin status alone. We evaluated the prognostic significance of Ki-67 expression in this setting.Entities:
Keywords: Biochemical recurrence; Ki-67; Positive surgical margin; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29506507 PMCID: PMC5838874 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-018-0330-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Urol ISSN: 1471-2490 Impact factor: 2.264
Fig. 1Ki-67 expression at the margin. a: Group 2 with Ki-67 expression less than or equal to 2%. b: Group 3 with Ki-67 expression ≥3%
Summary of the clinical and pathological data
| PSA failure | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Negative | Positive | |||
| Age | Mean (±SD) | 62.01 ± 6.06 | 62.35 ± 5.98 | 61.65 ± 5.21 | 0.53 |
| PSA-PRE surgery | 0–10 | 69 (61.1) | 42 (72.4) | 27 (49.1) | 0.04 |
| 10–20 | 31 (27.4) | 11 (19.0) | 20 (36.4) | ||
| > 20 | 13 (11.5) | 5 (8.6) | 8 (14.6) | ||
| GS | 6 | 16 (13.68) | 9 (15.00) | 7 (12.28) | 0.39 |
| 7 | 79 (67.52) | 43 (71.67) | 36 (63.16) | ||
| 8 | 17 (14.53) | 7 (11.67) | 10 (17.54) | ||
| 9 | 5 (4.27) | 1 (1.67) | 4 (7.02) | ||
| Tumor volume | Mean (±SD) | 26.52 ± 20.80 | 26.29 ± 19.30 | 26.78 ± 22.62 | 0.90 |
| EPE | No | 65 (55.56) | 37 (61.67) | 28 (49.12) | 0.17 |
| Yes | 52 (44.44) | 23 (38.33) | 29 (50.88) | ||
| SVI | No | 94 (80.34) | 49 (81.67) | 45 (78.95) | 0.71 |
| Yes | 23 (19.66) | 11 (18.33) | 12 (21.05) | ||
| Linear Length of the Margin | < 3 mm | 48 (41.38) | 28 (46.67) | 20 (35.71) | 0.23 |
| > = 3 mm | 68 (58.62) | 32 (53.33) | 36 (64.29) | ||
| KI67 at the Margin | 1 (no expression) | 64 (54.70) | 31 (51.67) | 33 (57.89) | 0.42 |
| 2 (weak expression) | 31 (26.50) | 19 (31.67) | 12 (21.05) | ||
| 3 (strong expression) | 22 (18.80) | 10 (16.67) | 12 (21.05) | ||
| Number of Margin | Single | 55 (47.01) | 30 (50.00) | 25 (43.86) | 0.51 |
| Multiple | 62 (52.99) | 30 (50.00) | 32 (56.14) | ||
| KI67-deep tumor | 1 (no expression) | 92 (78.63) | 49 (81.67) | 43 (75.44) | 0.71 |
| 2 (weak expression) | 11 (9.40) | 5 (8.33) | 6 (10.53) | ||
| 3 (strong expression) | 14 (11.97) | 6 (10.00) | 8 (14.04) | ||
| Adjuvant treatment | No | 55 (47.01) | 31 (51.67) | 24 (42.11) | 0.30 |
| Yes | 62 (52.99) | 29 (48.33) | 33 (57.89) | ||
Fig. 2Ki-67 expression at the margin and at the index lesion. a: Prostate Adenocarcinoma at the inked margin. b: High Ki-67 expression at the margin. c: Low Ki-67 expression at the index lesion
Predictors of biochemical recurrence on multivariable cox regression analysis
| HR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ki 67 in deep tumor | |||
| Group 1 | Reference | ||
| Group 2 | 1.41 | (0.57–3.52) | 0.46 |
| Group 3 | 4 | (1.64–9.80) | 0.002 |
| Ki 67 at margin | |||
| Group 1 | Reference | ||
| Group 2 | 1.12 | (0.55–2.31) | 0.75 |
| Group 3 | 2.08 | (0.97–4.43) | 0.06 |
| Length of the margin | |||
| < 3 mm | Reference | ||
| > =3 mm | 1.28 | (0.70–2.37) | 0.42 |
| Number of margin | |||
| Single margin | Reference | ||
| Multiple margins | 0.83 | (0.45–1.51) | 0.54 |