Wei Huang1,2, Ramandeep Randhawa2,3, Parag Jain2, Samuel Hubbard1, Jens Eickhoff4, Shivaani Kummar2,5, George Wilding2, Hirak Basu6, Rajat Roy2. 1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI. 2. PathomIQ, Inc, Cupertino, CA. 3. University of Southern California Marshall School of Business, Los Angeles, CA. 4. Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. 5. Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Center for Experimental Therapeutics, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR. 6. Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-powered method for the prediction of prostate cancer (PCa) early recurrence and identification of driver regions in PCa of all Gleason Grade Group (GGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Deep convolutional neural networks were used to develop the AI model. The AI model was trained on The Cancer Genome Atlas Prostatic Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-PRAD) whole slide images (WSI) and data set (n = 243) to predict 3-year biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) and was subsequently validated on WSI from patients with PCa (n = 173) from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. RESULTS: Our AI-powered platform can extract visual and subvisual morphologic features from WSI to identify driver regions predictive of early recurrence of PCa (regions of interest [ROIs]) after RP. The ROIs were ranked with AI-morphometric scores, which were prognostic for 3-year biochemical recurrence (area under the curve [AUC], 0.78), which is significantly better than the GGG overall (AUC, 0.62). The AI-morphometric scores also showed high accuracy in the prediction of recurrence for low- or intermediate-risk PCa-AUC, 0.76, 0.84, and 0.81 for GGG1, GGG2, and GGG3, respectively. These patients could benefit the most from timely adjuvant therapy after RP. The predictive value of the high-scored ROIs was validated by known PCa biomarkers studied. With this focused biomarker analysis, a potentially new STING pathway-related PCa biomarker-TMEM173-was identified. CONCLUSION: Our study introduces a novel approach for identifying patients with PCa at risk for early recurrence regardless of their GGG status and for identifying cancer drivers for focused evolution-aware novel biomarker discovery.
PURPOSE: To develop a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-powered method for the prediction of prostate cancer (PCa) early recurrence and identification of driver regions in PCa of all Gleason Grade Group (GGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Deep convolutional neural networks were used to develop the AI model. The AI model was trained on The Cancer Genome Atlas Prostatic Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-PRAD) whole slide images (WSI) and data set (n = 243) to predict 3-year biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) and was subsequently validated on WSI from patients with PCa (n = 173) from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. RESULTS: Our AI-powered platform can extract visual and subvisual morphologic features from WSI to identify driver regions predictive of early recurrence of PCa (regions of interest [ROIs]) after RP. The ROIs were ranked with AI-morphometric scores, which were prognostic for 3-year biochemical recurrence (area under the curve [AUC], 0.78), which is significantly better than the GGG overall (AUC, 0.62). The AI-morphometric scores also showed high accuracy in the prediction of recurrence for low- or intermediate-risk PCa-AUC, 0.76, 0.84, and 0.81 for GGG1, GGG2, and GGG3, respectively. These patients could benefit the most from timely adjuvant therapy after RP. The predictive value of the high-scored ROIs was validated by known PCa biomarkers studied. With this focused biomarker analysis, a potentially new STING pathway-related PCa biomarker-TMEM173-was identified. CONCLUSION: Our study introduces a novel approach for identifying patients with PCa at risk for early recurrence regardless of their GGG status and for identifying cancer drivers for focused evolution-aware novel biomarker discovery.
Authors: Kim N Chi; Neeraj Agarwal; Anders Bjartell; Byung Ha Chung; Andrea J Pereira de Santana Gomes; Robert Given; Álvaro Juárez Soto; Axel S Merseburger; Mustafa Özgüroğlu; Hirotsugu Uemura; Dingwei Ye; Kris Deprince; Vahid Naini; Jinhui Li; Shinta Cheng; Margaret K Yu; Ke Zhang; Julie S Larsen; Sharon McCarthy; Simon Chowdhury Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anis A Hamid; Kathryn P Gray; Grace Shaw; Laura E MacConaill; Carolyn Evan; Brandon Bernard; Massimo Loda; Niall M Corcoran; Eliezer M Van Allen; Atish D Choudhury; Christopher J Sweeney Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Brian Miles; Michael Ittmann; Thomas Wheeler; Mohammad Sayeeduddin; Antonio Cubilla; David Rowley; Ping Bu; Yi Ding; Yan Gao; MinJae Lee; Gustavo E Ayala Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Heidrun Gevensleben; Dimo Dietrich; Carsten Golletz; Susanne Steiner; Maria Jung; Thore Thiesler; Michael Majores; Johannes Stein; Barbara Uhl; Stefan Müller; Jörg Ellinger; Carsten Stephan; Klaus Jung; Peter Brossart; Glen Kristiansen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Yi-Mi Wu; Marcin Cieślik; Robert J Lonigro; Pankaj Vats; Melissa A Reimers; Xuhong Cao; Yu Ning; Lisha Wang; Lakshmi P Kunju; Navonil de Sarkar; Elisabeth I Heath; Jonathan Chou; Felix Y Feng; Peter S Nelson; Johann S de Bono; Weiping Zou; Bruce Montgomery; Ajjai Alva; Dan R Robinson; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Cell Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Jason R Woo; Michael A Liss; Michelle T Muldong; Kerrin Palazzi; Amy Strasner; Massimo Ammirante; Nissi Varki; Ahmed Shabaik; Stephen Howell; Christopher J Kane; Michael Karin; Christina A M Jamieson Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Christopher C Parker; Nicholas D James; Christopher D Brawley; Noel W Clarke; Alex P Hoyle; Adnan Ali; Alastair W S Ritchie; Gerhardt Attard; Simon Chowdhury; William Cross; David P Dearnaley; Silke Gillessen; Clare Gilson; Robert J Jones; Ruth E Langley; Zafar I Malik; Malcolm D Mason; David Matheson; Robin Millman; J Martin Russell; George N Thalmann; Claire L Amos; Roberto Alonzi; Amit Bahl; Alison Birtle; Omar Din; Hassan Douis; Chinnamani Eswar; Joanna Gale; Melissa R Gannon; Sai Jonnada; Sara Khaksar; Jason F Lester; Joe M O'Sullivan; Omi A Parikh; Ian D Pedley; Delia M Pudney; Denise J Sheehan; Narayanan Nair Srihari; Anna T H Tran; Mahesh K B Parmar; Matthew R Sydes Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-10-21 Impact factor: 79.321