Literature DB >> 29505771

Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial: effect of aspirin on length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit.

David Wright1, Daniel L Rolnik2, Argyro Syngelaki2, Catalina de Paco Matallana3, Mirian Machuca4, Mercedes de Alvarado5, Sofia Mastrodima6, Min Yi Tan7, Siobhan Shearing8, Nicola Persico9, Jacques C Jani10, Walter Plasencia11, George Papaioannou12, Francisca S Molina13, Liona C Poon14, Kypros H Nicolaides15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a major pregnancy complication with adverse short- and long-term implications for both the mother and baby. Screening for preeclampsia at 11-13 weeks' gestation by a combination of maternal demographic characteristics and medical history with measurements of biomarkers can identify about 75% of women who develop preterm preeclampsia with delivery at <37 weeks' gestation and 90% of those with early preeclampsia at <32 weeks, at a screen-positive rate of 10%. A recent trial (Combined Multimarker Screening and Randomized Patient Treatment with Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention) has reported that in women identified by first-trimester screening as being at high risk for preeclampsia, use of aspirin (150 mg/d from the first to the third trimester), compared to placebo, reduced the incidence of preterm preeclampsia, which was the primary outcome, by 62% (95% confidence interval, 26-80%) and the incidence of early preeclampsia by 89% (95% confidence interval, 53-97%). The surprising finding of the trial was that despite the reduction in preeclampsia the incidence of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, which was one of the secondary outcomes, was not significantly affected (odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-1.40).
OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the effect of prophylactic use of aspirin during pregnancy in women at high risk of preeclampsia on length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of data from the Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial to assess evidence of differences in the effect of aspirin on length of stay in neonatal intensive care. Bootstrapping was used for the comparison of mean length of stay between the aspirin and placebo groups. Logistic regression was used to assess treatment effects on stay in the neonatal intensive care unit.
RESULTS: In the trial there were 1620 participants and 1571 neonates were liveborn. The total length of stay in neonatal intensive care was substantially longer in the placebo than aspirin group (1696 vs 531 days). This is a reflection of significantly shorter mean lengths of stay in babies admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit from the aspirin than the placebo group (11.1 vs 31.4 days), a reduction of 20.3 days (95% confidence interval, 7.0-38.6; P = .008). Neonatal intensive care of babies born at <32 weeks' gestation contributed 1856 (83.3%) of the total of 2227 days in intensive care across both treatment arms. These occurred in 9 (1.2%) of the 777 livebirths in the aspirin group and in 23 (2.9%) of 794 in the placebo group (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.93; P = .033). Overall, in the whole population, including 0 lengths of stay for those not admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, the mean length of stay was longer in the placebo than aspirin group (2.06 vs 0.66 days; reduction of 1.4 days; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-2.81; P = .014). This corresponds to a reduction in length of stay of 68% (95% confidence interval, 20-86%).
CONCLUSION: In pregnancies at high risk of preeclampsia administration of aspirin reduces the length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit by about 70%. This reduction could essentially be attributed to a decrease in the rate of births at <32 weeks' gestation, mainly because of prevention of early preeclampsia. The findings have implications for both short- and long-term health care costs as well as infant survival and handicap.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Combined Multimarker Screening and Randomized Patient Treatment with Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial; aspirin; first-trimester screening; health economics; neonatal intensive care; preeclampsia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29505771     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  16 in total

1.  The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention.

Authors:  Liona C Poon; Andrew Shennan; Jonathan A Hyett; Anil Kapur; Eran Hadar; Hema Divakar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Fabricio da Silva Costa; Peter von Dadelszen; Harold David McIntyre; Anne B Kihara; Gian Carlo Di Renzo; Roberto Romero; Mary D'Alton; Vincenzo Berghella; Kypros H Nicolaides; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Giants in Obstetrics and Gynecology Series: a profile of Christopher Redman, MB, BChir, MRCP, FRCP.

Authors:  Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Giants in Obstetrics and Gynecology Series: a profile of Robert L. Goldenberg, MD.

Authors:  Roberto Romero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 10.693

4.  Antiplatelet agents for preventing pre-eclampsia and its complications.

Authors:  Lelia Duley; Shireen Meher; Kylie E Hunter; Anna Lene Seidler; Lisa M Askie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-30

Review 5.  Evidence-Based Prevention of Preeclampsia: Commonly Asked Questions in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Dagmar Wertaschnigg; Maya Reddy; Ben W J Mol; Fabricio da Silva Costa; Daniel L Rolnik
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2019-08-01

Review 6.  Prenatal screening for pre-eclampsia: Frequently asked questions.

Authors:  Dagmar Wertaschnigg; Maya Reddy; Ben W J Mol; Daniel L Rolnik; Fabricio da Silva Costa
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.100

7.  Early prediction of preeclampsia and small-for-gestational-age via multi-marker model in Chinese pregnancies: a prospective screening study.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Luhao Han; Wei Li; Qiaobin Chen; Jie Lei; Min Long; Weibin Yang; Wenya Li; Lizhen Zeng; Sifan Zeng
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Usefulness and reliability of cell free fetal DNA screening for main trisomies in case of atypical profile on first trimester maternal serum screening.

Authors:  Julie Carrara; Alexandre Vivanti; Jacques C Jani; Adèle Demain; Jean-Marc Costa; Alexandra Benachi
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.531

9.  Maternal health and non-communicable disease prevention: An investment case for the post COVID-19 world and need for better health economic data.

Authors:  Anil Kapur; Moshe Hod
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.447

10.  Artificial intelligence-assisted prediction of preeclampsia: Development and external validation of a nationwide health insurance dataset of the BPJS Kesehatan in Indonesia.

Authors:  Herdiantri Sufriyana; Yu-Wei Wu; Emily Chia-Yu Su
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 8.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.