Literature DB >> 29505147

Parenteral Protein Decision Support System Improves Protein Delivery in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mhd Wael Alrifai1, David P Mulherin2, Stuart T Weinberg1,3, Li Wang4, Christoph U Lehmann1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of neonatal parenteral protein intake for preterm infants is challenging and requires daily modifications of the dose to account for the infant's postnatal age, birth weight, current weight, and the volume and protein concentration of concurrent enteral nutrition. The objective of this study was to create and evaluate the Parenteral Protein Calculator (PPC), a clinical decision support system to improve the accuracy of protein intake for preterm infants who require parenteral nutrition (PN).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We integrated the PPC into the computerized provider order entry system and tested it in a randomized controlled trial (routine or PPC). Infants were eligible if they were ≤3 days old, had a birth weight ≤1500 g, and had no inborn error of metabolism. The primary outcome was the appropriate total protein intake, defined as target protein dose ±0.5 g/kg.
RESULTS: We randomly allocated 42 infants for 221 PN days in the control group and 211 in the PPC group. Total protein intake in the PPC group was more accurate as compared with the control group (appropriate protein dosing: odds ratio = 5.8; 95% CI, 2.7-12.4). Absolute deviation from protein target was 0.41 g/kg (0.24-0.58) lower in the PPC group.
CONCLUSION: The PPC improved appropriate protein dosing for premature infants receiving PN. Further studies are needed to test whether clinical decision support systems will reduce uremia and improve growth and to replicate similar findings in the cases of other PN nutrients.
© 2017 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical decision support system; medication dosing; parenteral nutrition; protein intake; uremia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29505147      PMCID: PMC5841609          DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  19 in total

1.  The role of a computer in the management of clinical parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  P D Wright; G Shearing; A J Rich; I D Johnston
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Safe practices for parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  Jay Mirtallo; Todd Canada; Deborah Johnson; Vanessa Kumpf; Craig Petersen; Gordon Sacks; David Seres; Peggi Guenter
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  The effect of a computerized prescribing and calculating system on hypo- and hyperglycemias and on prescribing time efficiency in neonatal intensive care patients.

Authors:  Barbara Maat; Carin M A Rademaker; Marloes I Oostveen; Tannette G Krediet; Toine C G Egberts; Casper W Bollen
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  Higher versus lower protein intake in formula-fed low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Tanis R Fenton; Shahirose S Premji; Heidi Al-Wassia; Reg S Sauve
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-04-21

Review 5.  Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems linked to electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Moja; Koren H Kwag; Theodore Lytras; Lorenzo Bertizzolo; Linn Brandt; Valentina Pecoraro; Giulio Rigon; Alberto Vaona; Francesca Ruggiero; Massimo Mangia; Alfonso Iorio; Ilkka Kunnamo; Stefanos Bonovas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Protein requirements in preterm infants: effect of different levels of protein intake on growth and body composition.

Authors:  Nicholas D Embleton; Richard J Cooke
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 7.  American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Nutrition. Nutritional needs of low-birth-weight infants.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  R A Ehrenkranz; N Younes; J A Lemons; A A Fanaroff; E F Donovan; L L Wright; V Katsikiotis; J E Tyson; W Oh; S Shankaran; C R Bauer; S B Korones; B J Stoll; D K Stevenson; L A Papile
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  A.S.P.E.N. parenteral nutrition safety consensus recommendations.

Authors:  Phil Ayers; Stephen Adams; Joseph Boullata; Jane Gervasio; Beverly Holcombe; Michael D Kraft; Neil Marshall; Antoinette Neal; Gordon Sacks; David S Seres; Patricia Worthington
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 10.  Aggressive nutrition of the very low birthweight infant.

Authors:  Ekhard E Ziegler; Patti J Thureen; Susan J Carlson
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.