Literature DB >> 29504655

Factors contributing to treatment outcomes of post-prostatectomy incontinence surgery for the selection of the proper surgical procedure for individual patients: A single-center experience.

Myong Kim1, Daehun Choi1, Jun Hyuk Hong1, Choung-Soo Kim1, Hanjong Ahn1, Myung-Soo Choo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical and urodynamic parameters affecting the treatment outcomes of post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the patients with PPI who received an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) or adjustable male sling (MS) from 2001 to 2016.
RESULTS: A total of 103 patients (AUS, 53; adjustable MS, 50) with a mean age of 69.9 (±5.6, standard deviation) years were analyzed. The mean number of pads used daily was 4.8 (±3.4). The mean symptom duration and follow-up duration were 46.9 (±31.1) and 31.0 (±21.4) months, respectively. The overall rate of treatment success (≤1 pad per day at last follow-up) at 12 months postoperatively was 81.6%. Based on univariate analysis, previous pelvic irradiation (P = 0.013), prior PPI surgery (P = 0.017), and degree of incontinence (P = 0.010) were inversely associated with the success of PPI surgery. In patients who received AUS, history of neurologic disease (P = 0.038) was inversely associated with treatment success. However, in patients with an adjustable MS, previous pelvic irradiation (P = 0.001), prior PPI surgery (P = 0.022), and degree of incontinence (P = 0.008) were inversely associated with treatment success.
CONCLUSIONS: Adjustable MS should be avoided in patients with previous pelvic irradiation, prior PPI surgery, or severe symptoms. Physicians should be aware that the treatment outcome of AUS might be compromised in patients with neurologic disease.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial urethral sphincter; incontinence; post-prostatectomy incontinence; predictive model; sling surgery; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29504655     DOI: 10.1002/nau.23543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  4 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: Risk Factors, Workup, and Clinical Approach.

Authors:  Roger K Khouri; Nicolas M Ortiz; Benjamin M Dropkin; Gregory A Joice; Adam S Baumgarten; Allen F Morey; Steven J Hudak
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Selecting the best candidate for a male incontinence device or another: dream or nightmare?

Authors:  Javier C Angulo
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter Is Better Than Slings for Moderate Male Stress Urinary Incontinence With Acceptable Complication Rate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lede Lin; Wenjin Sun; Xiaotong Guo; Liang Zhou
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-09

4.  Refined Nomogram Incorporating Standing Cough Test Improves Prediction of Adjustable Trans-Obturator Male System (ATOMS) Success to Treat Post-Prostatectomy Male Stress Incontinence.

Authors:  Juan F Dorado; Javier C Angulo
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-01-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.