Literature DB >> 29500912

Low-dose valganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in intermediate-risk liver transplantation recipients.

Salman Khan1, Timothy Sullivan1, Mohsin Ali2, Dallas Dunn1, Gopi Patel1, Shirish Huprikar1.   

Abstract

Liver transplantation recipients (LTRs) who are seropositive for cytomegalovirus (CMV) (recipient seropositive [R+]) are at intermediate risk for CMV disease. A preventative strategy following transplant is considered standard of care. Current guidelines recommend high-dose valganciclovir (VGCV; 900 mg/day adjusted for renal function) for prophylaxis given limited data on the efficacy and safety of low-dose VGCV (450 mg/day adjusted for renal function). We describe our experience using low-dose VGCV prophylaxis for R+ LTRs at our institution. A single-center, retrospective study was conducted using a database of 364 LTRs over a 4-year period (2011-2014). Adult first-time R+ LTRs receiving low-dose VGCV prophylaxis were included. The primary endpoint was CMV disease at 1 year after transplant. Patients were compared with historical controls receiving high-dose VGCV prophylaxis. Secondary endpoints were biopsy-proven rejection and leukopenia on VGCV. With respect to leukopenia, patients receiving low-dose VGCV were compared with a group of D+R- patients from the database receiving high-dose VGCV. Univariate analyses were performed using chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. A total of 200 R+ LTRs met inclusion criteria. Median age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-66 years), and 129 (65%) LTRs were male. Median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 22 (IQR, 14-31), and 178 (89%) patients received deceased donor transplants. CMV disease occurred in only 9 (5%) patients, similar to rates in previous studies of LTRs receiving high-dose VGCV. Biopsy-proven rejection occurred in 18 (9%) patients. Patients received VGCV prophylaxis for a median of 3.4 (IQR, 3.1-4.3) months; 151 (76%) R+ LTRs receiving low-dose VGCV developed leukopenia. Premature VGCV discontinuation and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor use were infrequent and not significantly different between the 2 groups. In conclusion, low-dose VGCV was safe and effective for prevention of CMV disease in our cohort of 200 R+ LTR and should be considered as an option in future guidelines. Liver Transplantation 24 616-622 2018 AASLD.
© 2018 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500912     DOI: 10.1002/lt.25047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  4 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Failure of Primary (Val)ganciclovir Prophylaxis Against Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Mark P Khurana; Isabelle P Lodding; Amanda Mocroft; Søren S Sørensen; Michael Perch; Allan Rasmussen; Finn Gustafsson; Jens D Lundgren
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.835

2.  Efficacy of low-dose valganciclovir in CMV R+ lung transplant recipients: a retrospective comparative analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Hunt; Kristina M Chapple; Aasya Nasar; Lauren Cherrier; Rajat Walia
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2021-01-25

3.  Safety of Valganciclovir 450 mg 3 Times Weekly for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Requiring Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Danielle Ecabert; Christine Pham; Brett J Pierce; William L Musick; Duc T Nguyen; Edward A Graviss
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  Incidence and risk factors for the development of cytomegalovirus viremia in a steroid sparing liver transplant center.

Authors:  Emily Viehl; Alicia Lichvar; Christine Chan; David Choi
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2022-06-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.