Jessica A Ogarek1, Ellen M McCreedy1, Kali S Thomas1,2, Joan M Teno3, Pedro L Gozalo1,2. 1. Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 2. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island. 3. Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To revise the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Changes in Health, End-stage disease and Symptoms and Signs (CHESS) scale, an MDS 2.0-based measure widely used to predict mortality in institutional settings, in response to the release of MDS 3.0. DESIGN: Development of a predictive scale using observational data from the MDS and Medicare Master Beneficiary Summary File. SETTING: All Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-certified nursing homes in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Development cohort of 1.3 million Medicare beneficiaries newly admitted to a CMS-certified nursing home during 2012. Primary validation cohort of 1.2 million Medicare recipients who were newly admitted to a CMS-certified nursing home during 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Items from the MDS 3.0 assessments identified as likely to predict mortality. Death information was obtained from the Medicare Master Beneficiary Summary File. RESULTS: MDS-CHESS 3.0 scores ranges from 0 (most stable) to 5 (least stable). Ninety-two percent of the primary validation sample with a CHESS scale score of 5 and 15% with a CHESS scale of 0 died within 1 year. The risk of dying was 1.63 times as great (95% CI=1.628-1.638) for each unit increase in CHESS scale score. The MDS-CHESS 3.0 is also strongly related to hospitalization within 30 days and successful discharge to the community. The scale predicted death in long-stay residents at 30 days (C=0.759, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.756-0.761), 60 days (C=0.716, 95% CI=0.714-0.718) and 1 year (C=0.655, 95% CI=0.654-0.657). CONCLUSION: The MDS-CHESS 3.0 predicts mortality in newly admitted and long-stay nursing home populations. The additional relationship to hospitalizations and successful discharges to community increases the utility of this scale as a potential risk adjustment tool.
OBJECTIVES: To revise the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Changes in Health, End-stage disease and Symptoms and Signs (CHESS) scale, an MDS 2.0-based measure widely used to predict mortality in institutional settings, in response to the release of MDS 3.0. DESIGN: Development of a predictive scale using observational data from the MDS and Medicare Master Beneficiary Summary File. SETTING: All Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-certified nursing homes in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Development cohort of 1.3 million Medicare beneficiaries newly admitted to a CMS-certified nursing home during 2012. Primary validation cohort of 1.2 million Medicare recipients who were newly admitted to a CMS-certified nursing home during 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Items from the MDS 3.0 assessments identified as likely to predict mortality. Death information was obtained from the Medicare Master Beneficiary Summary File. RESULTS:MDS-CHESS 3.0 scores ranges from 0 (most stable) to 5 (least stable). Ninety-two percent of the primary validation sample with a CHESS scale score of 5 and 15% with a CHESS scale of 0 died within 1 year. The risk of dying was 1.63 times as great (95% CI=1.628-1.638) for each unit increase in CHESS scale score. The MDS-CHESS 3.0 is also strongly related to hospitalization within 30 days and successful discharge to the community. The scale predicted death in long-stay residents at 30 days (C=0.759, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.756-0.761), 60 days (C=0.716, 95% CI=0.714-0.718) and 1 year (C=0.655, 95% CI=0.654-0.657). CONCLUSION: The MDS-CHESS 3.0 predicts mortality in newly admitted and long-stay nursing home populations. The additional relationship to hospitalizations and successful discharges to community increases the utility of this scale as a potential risk adjustment tool.
Authors: Debra Saliba; Malia Jones; Joel Streim; Joseph Ouslander; Dan Berlowitz; Joan Buchanan Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Zahinoor Ismail; Tamara Arenovich; Robert Granger; Charlotte Grieve; Peggie Willett; Scott Patten; Benoit H Mulsant Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Shekinah A Fashaw-Walters; Ellen McCreedy; Julie P W Bynum; Kali S Thomas; Theresa I Shireman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ellen M McCreedy; Anthony Sisti; Roee Gutman; Laura Dionne; James L Rudolph; Rosa Baier; Kali S Thomas; Miranda B Olson; Esme E Zediker; Rebecca Uth; Renée R Shield; Vincent Mor Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 7.802
Authors: Deborah S Lee; Andrew R Zullo; Yoojin Lee; Lori A Daiello; Dae Hyun Kim; Douglas P Kiel; Sarah D Berry Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Joshua D Niznik; Song Zhang; Maria K Mor; Xinhua Zhao; Mary Ersek; Sherrie L Aspinall; Walid F Gellad; Joshua M Thorpe; Joseph T Hanlon; Loren J Schleiden; Sydney Springer; Carolyn T Thorpe Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Elliott Bosco; Andrew R Zullo; Kevin W McConeghy; Patience Moyo; Robertus van Aalst; Ayman Chit; Vincent Mor; Stefan Gravenstein Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Justin Blackburn; Casey P Balio; Jennifer L Carnahan; Nicole R Fowler; Susan E Hickman; Greg A Sachs; Wanzhu Tu; Kathleen T Unroe Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Patience Moyo; Andrew R Zullo; Kevin W McConeghy; Elliott Bosco; Robertus van Aalst; Ayman Chit; Stefan Gravenstein Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Massirfufulay Kpehe Musa; Gizdem Akdur; Barbara Hanratty; Sarah Kelly; Adam Gordon; Guy Peryer; Karen Spilsbury; Anne Killett; Jennifer Burton; Julienne Meyer; Sue Fortescue; Ann-Marie Towers; Lisa Irvine; Claire Goodman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-11-14 Impact factor: 2.692