OBJECTIVES: To examine the reliability and validity of the Aggressive Behavior Scale (ABS), derived from the Minimum Data Set (MDS 2.0). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of MDS 2.0 and Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) data. SETTING: Ontario nursing homes (NHs) and complex continuing care (CCC) hospitals and units. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fourteen patients of a CCC hospital, 652 residents of four NH facilities who adopted the MDS 2.0 before its mandatory implementation, 124,259 CCC patients assessed with the MDS 2.0 between July 1996 and October 2006. MEASUREMENTS: In all samples, trained facility clinical staff completed the MDS 2.0 as part of normal clinical practice. The ABS is a 4-item summary scale measuring verbal and physical abuse, socially inappropriate behavior, and resisting care. In the single CCC facility, clinical facility staff completed the CMAI during the same assessment period as the MDS 2.0. RESULTS: Alphas for the ABS were between 0.79 and 0.93 for the three samples. A strong relationship was found between the ABS and the aggressive subscale of the CMAI (correlation coefficient=0.72, P<.001). Impairment in cognition was found to be related to higher ABS scores in all three samples. In CCC, individuals who had higher ABS scores also had a higher prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses and greater frequency of daily restraint use (P<.001 for each dependent variable). CONCLUSION: The ABS provides a useful measure of the severity of aggressive behavior that can be used for care planning, quality measurement, and research.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the reliability and validity of the Aggressive Behavior Scale (ABS), derived from the Minimum Data Set (MDS 2.0). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of MDS 2.0 and Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) data. SETTING: Ontario nursing homes (NHs) and complex continuing care (CCC) hospitals and units. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fourteen patients of a CCC hospital, 652 residents of four NH facilities who adopted the MDS 2.0 before its mandatory implementation, 124,259 CCC patients assessed with the MDS 2.0 between July 1996 and October 2006. MEASUREMENTS: In all samples, trained facility clinical staff completed the MDS 2.0 as part of normal clinical practice. The ABS is a 4-item summary scale measuring verbal and physical abuse, socially inappropriate behavior, and resisting care. In the single CCC facility, clinical facility staff completed the CMAI during the same assessment period as the MDS 2.0. RESULTS: Alphas for the ABS were between 0.79 and 0.93 for the three samples. A strong relationship was found between the ABS and the aggressive subscale of the CMAI (correlation coefficient=0.72, P<.001). Impairment in cognition was found to be related to higher ABS scores in all three samples. In CCC, individuals who had higher ABS scores also had a higher prevalence of psychiatric diagnoses and greater frequency of daily restraint use (P<.001 for each dependent variable). CONCLUSION: The ABS provides a useful measure of the severity of aggressive behavior that can be used for care planning, quality measurement, and research.
Authors: David G Stevenson; A James O'Malley; Stacie B Dusetzina; Susan L Mitchell; Barbara J Zarowitz; Michael E Chernew; Joseph P Newhouse; Haiden A Huskamp Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-08-14 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rianne M van der Linde; Blossom C M Stephan; Tom Dening; Carol Brayne Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Kali S Thomas; Rosa Baier; Cyrus Kosar; Jessica Ogarek; Alissa Trepman; Vincent Mor Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Brian Downer; Kali S Thomas; Vincent Mor; James S Goodwin; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Jacqueline B Palmer; Jennifer S Albrecht; Yujin Park; Sarah Dutcher; Gail B Rattinger; Linda Simoni-Wastila; Loreen D Walker; Ilene H Zuckerman Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Laura N Gitlin; Katherine A Marx; Ian H Stanley; Bryan R Hansen; Kimberly S Van Haitsma Journal: Int Psychogeriatr Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 3.878
Authors: Sally K Rigler; Theresa I Shireman; Galen J Cook-Wiens; Edward F Ellerbeck; Jeffrey C Whittle; David R Mehr; Jonathan D Mahnken Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 5.562