Literature DB >> 29500709

How do organ-specific metastases affect prognosis and surgical treatment for patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma: first evidence from population based data.

Fan Dong1, Hangcheng Fu2,3, Xiao Shi3, Yifan Shen1, Tianyuan Xu4, Fengbin Gao4, Xianjin Wang1, Shan Zhong1, Qiang Ding1, Zhoujun Shen1, Shanwen Chen5.   

Abstract

To evaluate the prognostic roles of organ-specific metastases and analyze the impact of organ-specific metastases on surgical resection of the primary tumor for metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients. A population-based study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was carried out. Kaplan-Meier analysis were used for survival comparisons. Multivariate Cox regression model was employed to analyze the effect of distant metastatic organs on overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). 337 patients from 2010 to 2014 were included. Patients with brain metastasis had significantly worse OS (p = 0.012) and CSS (p = 0.004). Liver metastasis could only independently predict unfavorable OS rather than CSS. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with bone, lung or distant lymph node metastasis was not independent prognostic factor for patients' survival. Surgical resection of the primary tumor was an independent favorable predictor for both OS (p = 0.004) and CSS advantages (p = 0.006). In subgroup analysis, patients with multiple organs of metastasis or distant lymph node involvement could benefit from surgical resection of the primary tumor. However, the presence of liver or lung metastasis could make such surgery become meaningless from the point of survival benefits. Our study showed that brain metastasis independently predicted both unfavorable OS and CSS for metastatic UTUC patients while liver metastasis was only associated with worse OS. More importantly, surgical resection of the primary tumor might still lead to survival benefits for highly selected patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer specific survival; Metastatic organ; Metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma; Overall survival; Surgical resection of the primary tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500709     DOI: 10.1007/s10585-018-9884-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis        ISSN: 0262-0898            Impact factor:   5.150


  14 in total

1.  The comparison of oncologic outcomes between metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma of the bladder after cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Meng-Che Hsieh; Po-Hui Chiang; Kun-Ming Rau; Yen-Yang Chen; Yu-Li Su; Cheng-Hua Huang
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Clinical correlates and prognostic value of different metastatic sites in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.404

3.  Prognostic factors in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract experiencing treatment failure with platinum-containing regimens.

Authors:  Joaquim Bellmunt; Toni K Choueiri; Ronan Fougeray; Fabio A B Schutz; Yacine Salhi; Eric Winquist; Stéphane Culine; Hans von der Maase; David J Vaughn; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Clinical correlates and prognostic value of different metastatic sites in patients with malignant melanoma of the skin: a SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  J Dermatolog Treat       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.359

5.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Metastatic behavior of upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy: association with primary tumor location.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Tanaka; Eiji Kikuchi; Kent Kanao; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Hiroki Ide; Yasumasa Miyazaki; Jun Obata; Katsura Hoshino; Suguru Shirotake; Hirotaka Akita; Takeo Kosaka; Akira Miyajima; Tetsuo Momma; Ken Nakagawa; Shintaro Hasegawa; Yosuke Nakajima; Masahiro Jinzaki; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  A critical appraisal of the value of lymph node dissection at nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Giovanni Lughezzani; Claudio Jeldres; Hendrik Isbarn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Daniel Pharand; Hugues Widmer; Philippe Arjane; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Prognostic risk stratification of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder with recurrence after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Tohru Nakagawa; Tomohiko Hara; Takashi Kawahara; Yoshihiko Ogata; Hiroyuki Nakanishi; Motokiyo Komiyama; Eri Arai; Yae Kanai; Hiroyuki Fujimoto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Prognostic value of site-specific metastases and therapeutic roles of surgery for patients with metastatic bladder cancer: a population-based study.

Authors:  Fan Dong; Yifan Shen; Fengbin Gao; Tianyuan Xu; Xianjin Wang; Xiaohua Zhang; Shan Zhong; Minguang Zhang; Shanwen Chen; Zhoujun Shen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Prognostic value of site-specific metastases in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database analysis.

Authors:  Hani Oweira; Ulf Petrausch; Daniel Helbling; Jan Schmidt; Meinrad Mannhart; Arianeb Mehrabi; Othmar Schöb; Anwar Giryes; Michael Decker; Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Bone metastases from urothelial carcinoma. The dark side of the moon.

Authors:  Marco Stellato; Daniele Santini; Maria Concetta Cursano; Simone Foderaro; Giuseppe Tonini; Giuseppe Procopio
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 4.072

2.  Survival Impact of Nephroureterectomy for De Novo Stage IV Nonmetastatic and Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei-Yu Lin; Meng-Hung Lin; Yao-Hsu Yang; Wen-Cheng Chen; Cih-En Huang; Miao-Fen Chen; Chun-Te Wu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  Role of Multimodal Treatment in Urothelial Carcinoma Spinal Metastasis: 15 Patients' Experiences in a Single Center.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Xin Gao; Kun Zhang; Jian Yang; Zheyu Wu; Tielong Liu; Qi Jia; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.989

4.  The role of surgery on primary site in metastatic upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma and a nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with metastatic upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaodi Zhang; Ping Wang; Kaiyan Qi; Qiao Qiao; Yuanjun Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Case report: Acute hepatic failure secondary to metastatic LIVER'S infiltration by upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Francesco Serra; Cristiano Guidetti; Francesco Spatafora; Francesca Cabry; Alberto Farinetti; Vittoria Mattioli Anna; Roberta Gelmini
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-11

6.  Surgical Management of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumor Thrombus: A Liver Transplant-Based Approach.

Authors:  Gaetano Ciancio; Marina M Tabbara; Melanie Martucci; Jeffrey J Gaynor; Mahmoud Morsi; Javier Gonzalez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.