Omar Abdel-Rahman1. 1. a Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine , Ain Shams University , Cairo , Egypt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Population-based data on the clinical correlates and prognostic value of the pattern of metastases among patients with cutaneous melanoma are needed. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2013) has been explored through SEER*Stat program. For each of six distant metastatic sites (bone, brain, liver, lung, distant lymph nodes, and skin/subcutaneous), relevant correlation with baseline characteristics were reported. Survival analysis has been conducted through Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate analysis has been conducted through a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: A total of 2691 patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma were identified in the period from 2010 to 2013. Patients with isolated skin/subcutaneous metastases have the best overall and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) followed by patients with isolated distant lymph node metastases followed by patients with isolated lung metastases. Patients with isolated liver, bone, or brain metastases have the worst overall and MSS (p < .0001 for both end points). Multivariate analysis revealed that age more than 70 at diagnosis (p = .012); multiple sites of metastases (p <.0001), no surgery to the primary tumor (p <.0001), and no surgery to the metastatic disease (p < .0001) were associated with worse overall survival (OS). For MSS, nodal positivity (p = .038), multiple sites of metastases (p < .0001), no surgery to the primary tumor (p < .0001), and no surgery to the metastatic disease (p < .0001) were associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of metastatic cutaneous melanoma patients differs considerably according to the site of distant metastases. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate the role of local treatment in the management of metastatic disease.
BACKGROUND: Population-based data on the clinical correlates and prognostic value of the pattern of metastases among patients with cutaneous melanoma are needed. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2013) has been explored through SEER*Stat program. For each of six distant metastatic sites (bone, brain, liver, lung, distant lymph nodes, and skin/subcutaneous), relevant correlation with baseline characteristics were reported. Survival analysis has been conducted through Kaplan-Meier analysis, and multivariate analysis has been conducted through a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: A total of 2691 patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma were identified in the period from 2010 to 2013. Patients with isolated skin/subcutaneous metastases have the best overall and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) followed by patients with isolated distant lymph node metastases followed by patients with isolated lung metastases. Patients with isolated liver, bone, or brain metastases have the worst overall and MSS (p < .0001 for both end points). Multivariate analysis revealed that age more than 70 at diagnosis (p = .012); multiple sites of metastases (p <.0001), no surgery to the primary tumor (p <.0001), and no surgery to the metastatic disease (p < .0001) were associated with worse overall survival (OS). For MSS, nodal positivity (p = .038), multiple sites of metastases (p < .0001), no surgery to the primary tumor (p < .0001), and no surgery to the metastatic disease (p < .0001) were associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of metastatic cutaneous melanomapatients differs considerably according to the site of distant metastases. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate the role of local treatment in the management of metastatic disease.
Entities:
Keywords:
Malignant melanoma; bone metastases; brain metastases; lung metastases
Authors: Francesco Mannavola; Mario Mandala; Annalisa Todisco; Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Marco Palla; Alessandro Marco Minisini; Laura Pala; Francesca Morgese; Lorenza Di Guardo; Luigia Stefania Stucci; Michele Guida; Alice Indini; Pietro Quaglino; Virginia Ferraresi; Riccardo Marconcini; Maria Chiara Tronconi; Ernesto Rossi; Olga Nigro; Marcella Occelli; Alessio Cortellini; Silvia Quadrini; Giuseppe Palmieri; Jacopo Pigozzo; Paolo Antonio Ascierto; Maria Grazia Vitale; Sabino Strippoli; Pier Francesco Ferrucci; Rossana Berardi; Giovanni Randon; Pietro Cardone; Giovanni Schinzari; Franco Silvestris; Marco Tucci Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Alexandra S Berghe; Gheorghe Cobzac; George Dindelegan; Simona C Șenilă; Corina I Baican; Carolina M Solomon; Liliana Rogojan; Daniel C Leucuța; Tudor C Drugan; Sorana D Bolboacă Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Julia K Tietze; Andrea Forschner; Carmen Loquai; Heidrun Mitzel-Rink; Lisa Zimmer; Frank Meiss; David Rafei-Shamsabadi; Jochen Utikal; Maike Bergmann; Friedegund Meier; Nicole Kreuzberg; Max Schlaak; Carsten Weishaupt; Claudia Pföhler; Mirjana Ziemer; Michael Fluck; Jessica Rainer; Markus V Heppt; Carola Berking Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-09-28