Literature DB >> 29500547

A new large-scale index (AcED) for assessing traffic noise disturbance on wildlife: stress response in a roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population.

Carlos Iglesias-Merchan1,2, Fernando Horcajada-Sánchez3, Luis Diaz-Balteiro4, Gema Escribano-Ávila5, Carlos Lara-Romero5, Emilio Virgós5, Aimara Planillo6, Isabel Barja7.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise is a growing ubiquitous and pervasive pollutant as well as a recognised stressor that spreads throughout natural ecosystems. However, there is still an urgent need for the assessment of noise impact on natural ecosystems. This article presents a multidisciplinary study which made it possible to isolate noise due to road traffic to evaluate it as a major driver of detrimental effects on wildlife populations. A new indicator has been defined: AcED (the acoustic escape distance) and faecal cortisol metabolites (FCM) were extracted from roe deer faecal samples as a validated indicator of physiological stress in animals moving around in two low-traffic roads that cross a National Park in Spain. Two key findings turned out to be relevant in this study: (i) road identity (i.e. road type defined by traffic volume and average speed) and AcED were the variables that best explained the FCM values observed in roe deer, and (ii) FCM concentration was positively related to increasing traffic volume (road type) and AcED values. Our results suggest that FCM analysis and noise mapping have shown themselves to be useful tools in multidisciplinary approaches and environmental monitoring. Furthermore, our findings aroused the suspicion that low-traffic roads (< 1000 vehicles per day) could be capable of causing higher habitat degradation than has been deemed until now.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortisol metabolites; Low traffic road; National park; Noise modelling; Physiological stress; Road ecology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500547     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-6573-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  35 in total

Review 1.  Noise pollution: non-auditory effects on health.

Authors:  Stephen A Stansfeld; Mark P Matheson
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Traffic noise and risk of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Wolfgang Babisch; Bernd Beule; Marianne Schust; Norbert Kersten; Hartmut Ising
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Visitor assessment of the mandatory alternative transportation system at Zion National Park.

Authors:  Britton L Mace; Joshua D Marquit; Scott C Bates
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  How and why environmental noise impacts animals: an integrative, mechanistic review.

Authors:  Caitlin R Kight; John P Swaddle
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Road traffic noise impact assessment in a breeding colony of cinereous vultures (Aegypius monachus) in Spain.

Authors:  Carlos Iglesias-Merchán; Luis Diaz-Balteiro; Javier de la Puente
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Physiological stress responses, fecal marking behavior, and reproduction in wild European pine martens (Martes martes).

Authors:  Isabel Barja; Gema Silván; Leticia Martínez-Fernández; Juan Carlos Illera
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Assessing stress in animal populations: Do fecal and plasma glucocorticoids tell the same story?

Authors:  Michael J Sheriff; Charles J Krebs; Rudy Boonstra
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.822

8.  Predictors of noise annoyance in noisy and quiet urban streets.

Authors:  Katarina Paunović; Branko Jakovljević; Goran Belojević
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Roadless and Low-Traffic Areas as Conservation Targets in Europe.

Authors:  Nuria Selva; Stefan Kreft; Vassiliki Kati; Martin Schluck; Bengt-Gunnar Jonsson; Barbara Mihok; Henryk Okarma; Pierre L Ibisch
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Are motorways potential stressors of roadside wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) populations?

Authors:  Álvaro Navarro-Castilla; Cristina Mata; Pablo Ruiz-Capillas; Rupert Palme; Juan E Malo; Isabel Barja
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Testosterone and the dark ventral patch of male red deer: the role of the social environment.

Authors:  Eva de la Peña; José Martín; Isabel Barja; Juan Carranza
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2020-04-24

2.  Incorporating acoustic objectives into Forest Management Planning when sensitive bird species are relevant.

Authors:  Carlos Iglesias-Merchan; Esther Ortiz-Urbina; Marta Ezquerro; Luis Diaz-Balteiro
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Behavioral responses of the European mink in the face of different threats: conspecific competitors, predators, and anthropic disturbances.

Authors:  Lorena Ortiz-Jiménez; Carlos Iglesias-Merchan; Isabel Barja
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Social environment modulates investment in sex trait versus lifespan: red deer produce bigger antlers when facing more rivalry.

Authors:  Juan Carranza; Javier Pérez-Barbería; Concha Mateos; Susana Alarcos; Jerónimo Torres-Porras; Javier Pérez-González; Cristina B Sánchez-Prieto; Juliana Valencia; Leticia Castillo; Eva de la Peña; Isabel Barja; José M Seoane; Manuel M Reglero; Antonio Flores; Alberto Membrillo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.