Literature DB >> 24036600

Visitor assessment of the mandatory alternative transportation system at Zion National Park.

Britton L Mace1, Joshua D Marquit, Scott C Bates.   

Abstract

Transportation infrastructure in national parks has historically been designed for the automobile. With more vehicles in the parks, visitors found themselves in circumstances more reminiscent of a city than a park. Traffic jams, overcrowding, illegal parking, horn honking, and idling vehicles became common, creating stress and contributing to air and noise pollution, the very things visitors were hoping to get away from. Park managers began searching for alternatives, including shuttle systems. Many national parks have implemented optional shuttle systems, but relatively few have completely closed roads to vehicles, transporting visitors on mandatory shuttles. Zion National Park instituted a mandatory shuttle system in May 2000 to relieve crowding and congestion in the main canyon and to protect natural resources. Taking a longitudinal approach, attributes of the shuttle (e.g., crowding, accessibility, freedom, efficiency, preference, and success) were assessed with experiential park factors (e.g., scenic beauty, naturalness, solitude, tranquility, air quality, and soundscape) in 2000, 2003, and 2010 by surveying shuttle-riding park visitors. While visitors initially reported a few reservations about the shuttle system, by 2003, the majority rated the system successful. Ratings of all shuttle-related variables, except crowding, improved over the decade. Improvements were greatest for freedom, accessibility, and efficiency. Multiple regression found overall shuttle success to be mediated by preference, freedom, accessibility, efficiency, and comfort. Experiential variables assessing park conditions followed a similar pattern, with improved ratings as the decade progressed. Results provide important insights into the visitor experience with mandatory alternative shuttle systems in national parks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24036600     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0164-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  An interpretive study of Yosemite National Park visitors' perspectives toward alternative transportation in Yosemite Valley.

Authors:  Dave D White
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Evidence for a fundamental and pervasive shift away from nature-based recreation.

Authors:  Oliver R W Pergams; Patricia A Zaradic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An assessment of road impacts on wildlife populations in U.S. national parks.

Authors:  Rob Ament; Anthony P Clevenger; Olivia Yu; Amanda Hardy
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING: Choosing Indicators of Natural Resource Condition: A Case Study in Arches National Park, Utah, USA

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  A global perspective on trends in nature-based tourism.

Authors:  Andrew Balmford; James Beresford; Jonathan Green; Robin Naidoo; Matt Walpole; Andrea Manica
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 8.029

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  A new large-scale index (AcED) for assessing traffic noise disturbance on wildlife: stress response in a roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) population.

Authors:  Carlos Iglesias-Merchan; Fernando Horcajada-Sánchez; Luis Diaz-Balteiro; Gema Escribano-Ávila; Carlos Lara-Romero; Emilio Virgós; Aimara Planillo; Isabel Barja
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Visitor Capacity Considering Social Distancing in Urban Parks with Agent-Based Modeling.

Authors:  Zhi Yue; Jon Bryan Burley; Zhouxiao Cui; Houping Lei; Jing Zhou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.