Alex J Bartholomew1, Anna K Houk1, Marisa Pulcrano1, Nawar M Shara2, John Kwagyan3, Patrick G Jackson1, Michael Sosin4. 1. Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland. 3. The Georgetown-Howard University Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Washington, DC. 4. Department of Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC. Electronic address: sosinmi@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Surgeon burnout compromises the quality of life of physicians and the delivery of care to patients. Burnout rates and interpretation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) complicates the interpretation of surgeon burnout. The purpose of this study is to apply a standardized interpretation of severe surgeon burnout termed, "burnout syndrome" to analyze inherent variation within surgical specialties. DESIGN: A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and EMBASE to identify studies reporting MBI data by surgical specialty. Data extraction was performed to isolate surgeon specific data. SETTING: A meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 16 cross-sectional studies were included in this meta-analysis, totaling 3581 subjects. A random effects model approximated burnout syndrome at 3.0% (95% CI: 2.0%-5.0%; I2 = 78.1%). Subscale analysis of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment indicated subscale burnout in 30.0% (CI: 25.0%-36.0%; I2 = 93.2%), 34.0% (CI: 25.0%-43.0%; I2 = 96.9%), and 25.0% (CI: 18.0%-32.0%; I2 = 96.5%) of surgeons, respectively. Significant differences (p < 0.001) in MBI subscale scoring existed among surgical specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 3% of surgeons suffer from extreme forms of burnout termed "burnout syndrome," although surgeon burnout may occur in up to 34% of surgeons, characterized by high burnout in 1 of 3 subscales. Surgical specialties have significantly different rates of burnout subscales. Future burnout studies should target the specialty-specific level to understand inherent differences in an effort to better understand methods of improving surgeon burnout.
OBJECTIVE: Surgeon burnout compromises the quality of life of physicians and the delivery of care to patients. Burnout rates and interpretation of the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) complicates the interpretation of surgeon burnout. The purpose of this study is to apply a standardized interpretation of severe surgeon burnout termed, "burnout syndrome" to analyze inherent variation within surgical specialties. DESIGN: A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and EMBASE to identify studies reporting MBI data by surgical specialty. Data extraction was performed to isolate surgeon specific data. SETTING: A meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 16 cross-sectional studies were included in this meta-analysis, totaling 3581 subjects. A random effects model approximated burnout syndrome at 3.0% (95% CI: 2.0%-5.0%; I2 = 78.1%). Subscale analysis of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment indicated subscale burnout in 30.0% (CI: 25.0%-36.0%; I2 = 93.2%), 34.0% (CI: 25.0%-43.0%; I2 = 96.9%), and 25.0% (CI: 18.0%-32.0%; I2 = 96.5%) of surgeons, respectively. Significant differences (p < 0.001) in MBI subscale scoring existed among surgical specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 3% of surgeons suffer from extreme forms of burnout termed "burnout syndrome," although surgeon burnout may occur in up to 34% of surgeons, characterized by high burnout in 1 of 3 subscales. Surgical specialties have significantly different rates of burnout subscales. Future burnout studies should target the specialty-specific level to understand inherent differences in an effort to better understand methods of improving surgeon burnout.
Authors: M Catherine Sargent; Wayne Sotile; Mary O Sotile; Harry Rubash; Robert L Barrack Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Charles M Balch; Gerald J Bechamps; Thomas Russell; Lotte Dyrbye; Daniel Satele; Paul Collicott; Paul J Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Julie A Freischlag Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Charles M Balch; Gerald Bechamps; Tom Russell; Lotte Dyrbye; Daniel Satele; Paul Collicott; Paul J Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Julie Freischlag Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Paul Klimo; Michael DeCuypere; Brian T Ragel; Shirley McCartney; William T Couldwell; Frederick A Boop Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2012-09-25 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Henry M Kuerer; Timothy J Eberlein; Raphael E Pollock; Mashele Huschka; Walter F Baile; Monica Morrow; Fabrizio Michelassi; S Eva Singletary; Paul Novotny; Jeff Sloan; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-09-09 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Valeria S M Valbuena; Joy E Obayemi; Tanjala S Purnell; Velma P Scantlebury; Kim M Olthoff; Paulo N Martins; Robert S Higgins; Daryle M Blackstock; André A S Dick; Anthony C Watkins; Michael J Englesbe; Dinee C Simpson Journal: Curr Opin Organ Transplant Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 2.269
Authors: Abdulelah M Sharaf; Isra H Abdulla; Abdullah M Alnatheer; Aghadir N Alahmari; Omar A Alwhibi; Ziyad Alabduljabbar; Hamzah Alhamzah; Feras M Alkholaiwi Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-05-20
Authors: David S Kirwin; Harold G Moore; Taylor D Ottesen; Alexander M Moushey; Marissa A Justen; Jonathan N Grauer Journal: N Am Spine Soc J Date: 2021-08-23