Literature DB >> 29500119

Single versus multi-item self-assessment of sedentary behaviour: A comparison with objectively measured sedentary time in nurses.

Stephanie A Prince1, Robert D Reid2, Jordan Bernick3, Anna E Clarke2, Jennifer L Reed2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare sedentary time (ST) measured by self-report using a single question from the short-form International Physical Activity Questionnaire (SF-IPAQ), 18-items from the Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (SBQ) and objectively using an accelerometer among a large sample of nurses.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
METHODS: Participants wore an ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer (≥4 days, ≥10h/day) and self-reported usual day sitting using the IPAQ and sitting in different modes using the SBQ. Measures were compared using correlations, a Friedman test with Wilcoxon signed-ranks tests for pairwise comparisons, linear regression and Bland-Altman plots.
RESULTS: A total of 313 nurses (95% female; mean±SD: age=43±12 years) from 14 hospitals participated. Participants self-reported sitting for a median of 240min/day using the SF-IPAQ and 328min/day using the SBQ. Median ST measured by the ActiGraph was 434min/day. All measures were weakly correlated with each other (ρ=0.31-40, ps<0.001). Limits of agreement were wide between all measures. Significant proportional bias between the ActiGraph and the SF-IPAQ and SBQ existed, suggesting that with greater amounts of ST, there is greater disagreement between the self-report and objective measures.
CONCLUSIONS: In a sample of nurses, self-reported ST using the SF-IPAQ and SBQ was significantly lower than that measured by accelerometer. A single-item tool performed more poorly than a multi-item questionnaire. Future studies should consider including both objective and self-report measures of ST, and where possible use a tool that quantifies ST across multiple domains, define a 'usual day' and are meaningful for those with daily schedule variations such as among shift-worker populations.
Copyright © 2018 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise; Motor activity; Nurses; Sedentary time; Surveys and questionnaires; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500119     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 1878-1861            Impact factor:   4.319


  6 in total

1.  Sedentary Behaviour Intervention as a Personalised Secondary Prevention Strategy (SIT LESS) for patients with coronary artery disease participating in cardiac rehabilitation: rationale and design of the SIT LESS randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  B M A van Bakel; S H Kroesen; A Günal; A Scheepmaker; W R M Aengevaeren; F F Willems; R Wondergem; M F Pisters; J Dam; A M Janssen; M de Bruin; M T E Hopman; D H J Thijssen; T M H Eijsvogels
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  A latent class analysis of health risk behaviours in the UK Police Service and their associations with mental health and job strain.

Authors:  Patricia Irizar; Suzanne H Gage; Victoria Fallon; Laura Goodwin
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.144

Review 3.  The past, present and future of opioid withdrawal assessment: a scoping review of scales and technologies.

Authors:  Joseph K Nuamah; Farzan Sasangohar; Madhav Erraguntla; Ranjana K Mehta
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Domain-Specific Adult Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire (ASBQ) and the GPAQ Single-Item Question: A Reliability and Validity Study in an Asian Population.

Authors:  Anne H Y Chu; Sheryl H X Ng; David Koh; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Validity and reliability of subjective methods to assess sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Esmée A Bakker; Yvonne A W Hartman; Maria T E Hopman; Nicola D Hopkins; Lee E F Graves; David W Dunstan; Genevieve N Healy; Thijs M H Eijsvogels; Dick H J Thijssen
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  Sedentary behaviour surveillance in Canada: trends, challenges and lessons learned.

Authors:  Stephanie A Prince; Alexandria Melvin; Karen C Roberts; Gregory P Butler; Wendy Thompson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 6.457

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.