| Literature DB >> 29499680 |
Marco Cossio-Bolaños1,2,3, Cynthia Lee-Andruske4, Miguel de Arruda1, Cristian Luarte-Rocha5, Alejandro Almonacid-Fierro6, Rossana Gómez-Campos7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Maintaining and building healthy bones during the lifetime requires a complicated interaction between a number of physiological and lifestyle factors. Our goal of this study was to analyze the association between hand grip strength and the maximum peak expiratory flow with bone mineral density and content in adolescent students.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Biological maturation; Bone density health; Hand grip strength; Maximum expiratory flow
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29499680 PMCID: PMC5834893 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-018-1015-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Characteristics of the sample studied
| Variables | Males ( | Females (677) | Both sexes ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Age (years) | 15.67 | 2.04 | 15.45 | 2.18 | 15.59 | 2.09 |
| Biological age (APHV) | 14.98 | 0.93 | 11.78 | 0.48* | ||
| Anthropometry | ||||||
| Weight (kg) | 64.81 | 14.86 | 58.67 | 12.52* | 62.66 | 14.38 |
| Standing height (cm) | 165.41 | 17.45 | 152.84 | 28.81* | 160.92 | 22.98 |
| Sitting height (cm) | 86.93 | 6.17 | 83.02 | 4.28* | 85.59 | 5.89 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.18 | 4.30 | 23.41 | 4.31 | 23.26 | 4.30 |
| Body composition (DXA) | ||||||
| Percentage of Fat (% G) | 23.99 | 8.49 | 34.94 | 7.37* | 27.7 | 9.64 |
| Fat Mass (kg) | 15.34 | 8.18 | 20.23 | 8.19* | 17.01 | 8.50 |
| Lean Mass (kg) | 46.76 | 9.92 | 36.2 | 6.85* | 43.18 | 10.29 |
| BMD (g/cm2) | ||||||
| Body total | 1.051 | 0.160 | 0.941 | 0.110* | 1.010 | 0.152 |
| BMC (g) | ||||||
| Body total | 2.509 | 0.543 | 2.051 | 0.35* | 2.348 | 0.532 |
| Isometric strength (lbf) | ||||||
| Right Hand | 65.27 | 30.24 | 50.03 | 19.19* | 59.01 | 27.31 |
| Left Hand | 62.84 | 28.84 | 46.95 | 17.69* | 56.32 | 26.07 |
| Maximum peak expiratory flow (L/min) | 368.89 | 119.37 | 296.35 | 82.86* | 346.02 | 114.18 |
X Mean, SD Standard deviation, APHV Age at peak height velocity, BMI Body Mass Index, BMD Bone Mineral Density, BMC Bone Mineral Content, * = Significant difference (p < 0.001)
Estimation of the BMD and BMC predictors base d on linear multiple regression of adolescent students
| Dependent variables | Independent variables | Males | Females | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | R2 | EE | p | R | R2 | EE | p | ||
| BMD (g/cm2) | |||||||||
| Body total | Somatic Maturation | 0.73 | 0.53 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.08 | 0.00 |
| Hand grip strength - left | 0.44 | 0.19 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.35 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.00 | |
| Hand grip strength - right | 0.43 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.00 | |
| Maximum peak expiratory flow | 0.57 | 0.33 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.00 | |
| BMC (g) | |||||||||
| Body total | Somatic Maturation | 0.79 | 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.64 | 0.41 | 0.24 | 0.00 |
| Hand grip strength - left | 0.49 | 0.24 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.00 | |
| Hand grip strength - right | 0.48 | 0.23 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 0.43 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.00 | |
| Maximum peak expiratory flow | 0.60 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.00 | |
BMD Mineral bone density, BMC Bone mineral content, EEE Standard Error of the Estimate
Fig. 1BMD and BMC values for adolescent students based on hand grip strength expressed in categories (tertiles). a: significant difference related to males in Tertile 1; b: significant difference related to males in Tertile 2; +: significant difference in females in Tertile 1; ++: significant difference in females in Tertile 2
Fig. 2BMD and BMC values of adolescent students based on maximum peak expiratory flow expressed in categories (tertiles). a: significant difference related to males in Tertile 1; b: significant difference related to males in Tertile 2; +: significant difference irelated to females in Tertile 1; ++: significant difference related to females in Tertile 2