Literature DB >> 22538687

Effect of monopolar radiofrequency energy on pacemaker function.

Henry R Govekar1, Thomas N Robinson, Paul D Varosy, Guillaume Girard, Paul N Montero, Christina L Dunn, Edward L Jones, Greg V Stiegmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to quantify the clinical parameters of mono- and bipolar instruments that inhibit pacemaker function. The specific aims were to quantify pacer inhibition resulting from the monopolar instrument by altering the generator power setting, the generator mode, the distance between the active electrode and the pacemaker, and the location of the dispersive electrode.
METHODS: A transvenous ventricular lead pacemaker overdrive paced the native heart rate of an anesthetized pig. The primary outcome variable was pacer inhibition quantified as the number of beats dropped by the pacemaker during 5 s of monopolar active electrode activation.
RESULTS: Lowering the generator power setting from 60 to 30 W decreased the number of dropped paced events (2.3 ± 1.2 vs 1.6 ± 0.8 beats; p = 0.045). At 30 W of power, use of the cut mode decreased the number of dropped paced beats compared with the coagulation mode (0.6 ± 0.5 vs 1.6 ± 0.8; p = 0.015). At 30 W coagulation, firing the active electrode at different distances from the pacemaker generator (3.75, 7.5, 15, and 30 cm) did not change the number of dropped paced beats (p = 0.314, analysis of variance [ANOVA]). The dispersive electrode was placed in four locations (right/left gluteus, right/left shoulder). More paced beats were dropped when the current vector traveled through the pacemaker/leads than when it did not (1.5 ± 1.0 vs 0.2 ± 0.4; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical parameters that reduce the inhibition of a pacemaker by monopolar instruments include lowering the generator power setting, using cut (vs coagulation) mode, and locating the dispersive electrode so the current vector does not traverse the pacemaker generator or leads.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538687     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2279-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  7 in total

1.  Electrosurgery: history, principles, and current and future uses.

Authors:  Nader N Massarweh; Ned Cosgriff; Douglas P Slakey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Effects of surgical and endoscopic electrocautery on modern-day permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems.

Authors:  Alan Cheng; Saman Nazarian; David D Spragg; Kenneth Bilchick; Harikrishna Tandri; Lynette Mark; Henry Halperin; Hugh Calkins; Ronald D Berger; Charles A Henrikson
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Practice advisory for the perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: an updated report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on perioperative management of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS)/American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Expert Consensus Statement on the perioperative management of patients with implantable defibrillators, pacemakers and arrhythmia monitors: facilities and patient management this document was developed as a joint project with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), and in collaboration with the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS).

Authors:  George H Crossley; Jeanne E Poole; Marc A Rozner; Samuel J Asirvatham; Alan Cheng; Mina K Chung; T Bruce Ferguson; John D Gallagher; Michael R Gold; Robert H Hoyt; Samuel Irefin; Fred M Kusumoto; Liza Prudente Moorman; Annemarie Thompson
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  16-year trends in the infection burden for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the United States 1993 to 2008.

Authors:  Arnold J Greenspon; Jasmine D Patel; Edmund Lau; Jorge A Ochoa; Daniel R Frisch; Reginald T Ho; Behzad B Pavri; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  The patient with a cardiac pacemaker or implanted defibrillator and management during anaesthesia.

Authors:  Marc A Rozner
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.706

7.  Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) and arrhythmic events in ICD patients undergoing gastrointestinal procedures.

Authors:  Danette Guertin; Osman Faheem; Thea Ling; Glenn Pelletier; David McComas; Ravi K Yarlagadda; Christopher Clyne; Jeffrey Kluger
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.976

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Stray energy transfer during endoscopy.

Authors:  Edward L Jones; Amin Madani; Douglas M Overbey; Asimina Kiourti; Satheesh Bojja-Venkatakrishnan; Dean J Mikami; Jeffrey W Hazey; Todd R Arcomano; Thomas N Robinson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy™ (FUSE): a curriculum on surgical energy-based devices.

Authors:  Amin Madani; Daniel B Jones; Pascal Fuchshuber; Thomas N Robinson; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The safe use of surgical energy devices by surgeons may be overestimated.

Authors:  Ally Ha; Carly Richards; Erik Criman; Jillian Piaggione; Christopher Yheulon; Robert Lim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The SAGES Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy program (FUSE): history, development, and purpose.

Authors:  P Fuchshuber; S Schwaitzberg; D Jones; S B Jones; L Feldman; M Munro; T Robinson; G Purcell-Jackson; D Mikami; A Madani; M Brunt; B Dunkin; C Gugliemi; L Groah; R Lim; J Mischna; C R Voyles
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Monopolar stray energy in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Douglas M Overbey; Heather Carmichael; Krzysztof J Wikiel; Douglas A Hirth; Brandon C Chapman; John T Moore; Carlton C Barnett; Teresa S Jones; Thomas N Robinson; Edward L Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE): An Essential Educational Program for Operating Room Safety.

Authors:  Stephanie B Jones; Malcolm G Munro; Liane S Feldman; Thomas N Robinson; L Michael Brunt; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Pascal R Fuchshuber
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

7.  Structured simulation improves learning of the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy™ curriculum: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amin Madani; Yusuke Watanabe; Nicole Townsend; Philip H Pucher; Thomas N Robinson; Patricia E Egerszegi; Jaisa Olasky; Sharon L Bachman; Chan W Park; Nalin Amin; David T Tang; Erika Haase; Davide Bardana; Daniel B Jones; Melina Vassiliou; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Surgeons have knowledge gaps in the safe use of energy devices: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Yo Kurashima; Amin Madani; Liane S Feldman; Minoru Ishida; Akihiko Oshita; Takeshi Naitoh; Kazuhiro Noma; Keigo Yasumasa; Hiroshi Nagata; Fumitaka Nakamura; Koichi Ono; Yoshinori Suzuki; Nobuhisa Matsuhashi; Toshiaki Shichinohe; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery.

Authors:  Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Rajeswara R Resapu; Daniel B Jones; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Preventing and managing complications in dermatologic surgery: Procedural and postsurgical concerns.

Authors:  Allen G Strickler; Payal Shah; Shirin Bajaj; Richard Mizuguchi; Rajiv I Nijhawan; Mercy Odueyungbo; Anthony Rossi; Désirée Ratner
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 15.487

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.