| Literature DB >> 29497215 |
Mohamed Traoré1, Joeri Kaal1,2, Antonio Martínez Cortizas1.
Abstract
Attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared (FTIR-ATR) spectroscopy was applied to 120 samples of heartwood rings from eight individual pine trees from different locations in Spain. Pinus sylvestris cores were collected at the Artikutza natural park (Ps-ART). Pinus nigra cores were collected in Sierra de Cazorla (Pn-LIN) and in La Sagra Mountain (Pn-LSA). Three discriminant analysis tests were performed using all bands (DFT), lignin bands only (DFL) and polysaccharides bands only (DFP), to explore the ability of FTIR-ATR to separate between species and growing location. The DFL model enabled a good separation between pine species, whereas the DFP model enabled differentiation for both species and growing location. The DFT model enabled virtually perfect separation, based on two functions involving twelve FTIR bands. Discrimination between species was related to bands at 860 and 1655 cm-1, which were more intense in P. sylvestris samples, and bands at 1425 and 1635 cm-1, more intense in P. nigra samples. These vibrations were related to differences in lignin structure and polysaccharide linear chains. Discrimination between growing locations was mainly related to polysaccharide absorptions: at 900, 1085 and 1335 cm-1 more representative of Pn-LIN samples, and at 1105 and 1315 cm-1 mostly associated to Pn-LSA samples. These absorptions are related to β-glycosidic linkages (900 cm-1), cellulose and hemicellulose (C-O bonds, 1085 and 1105 cm-1) and content in amorphous/crystalline cellulose (1315 and 1335 cm-1). These results show that FTIR-ATR in combination with multivariate statistics can be a useful tool for species identification and provenancing for pine wood samples of unknown origin.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29497215 PMCID: PMC5816091 DOI: 10.1007/s00226-017-0967-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Wood Sci Technol ISSN: 0043-7719 Impact factor: 2.506
Fig. 1Map of the sampling locations (LSA La Sagra Mountain, LIN Linarejos, ART Artikutza)
Samples used in the present study
| No. | Sites | Site codes | Tree ID | Species | No. recorded spectra |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Artikutza | Ps-ART | Ps-ART-A |
| 15 |
| 2 | Artikutza | Ps-ART | Ps-ART-B |
| 15 |
| 3 | Linarejos (plot 1) | Pn-LIN01 | Pn-LIN01-A |
| 15 |
| 4 | Linarejos (plot 1) | Pn-LIN01 | Pn-LIN01-B |
| 15 |
| 5 | Linarejos (plot 3) | Pn-LIN03 | Pn-LIN03-A |
| 15 |
| 6 | Linarejos (plot 3) | Pn-LIN03 | Pn-LIN03-B |
| 15 |
| 7 | La Sagra | Pn-LSA | Pn-LSA-A |
| 15 |
| 8 | La Sagra | Pn-LSA | Pn-LSA-B |
| 15 |
| Total | 120 |
Infrared bands and related molecular bond assignments
| No. | Bands (cm−1) | Band assignments (References) | PCA factora |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 805 | Vibration of mannan in hemicellulose and CH out of plane bending in phenyl rings (Evans et al. | PC1 |
| 2 | 825 | CH out of plane bending in guaiacyl units (Faix | PC3 |
| 3 | 860 | C–H out of plane in position 2, 5, and 6 of guaiacyl units (Faix | PC3 |
| 4 | 900 | CH deformation of beta-glycosidic linkages in cellulose (Evans et al. | PC1 |
| 5 | 945 | O–H out of plane deformation in carboxylic acid (Shearer | PC2 |
| 6 | 960 | CH out of plane deformation in lignin (Popescu et al. | PC3 |
| 7 | 985 | CO stretching in cellulose (Herrera et al. | PC1 |
| 8 | 1005 | C–O stretch in cellulose (Liang and Marchessault | PC1 |
| 9 | 1025 | C–O stretching in primary alcohols in cellulose (Popescu et al. | PC1 |
| 10 | 1055 | C–O stretching of secondary alcohols (Faix | PC1 |
| 11 | 1105 | C–O–C stretching in cellulose and hemicellulose (McCann et al. | PC1 |
| 12 | 1155 | C–O–C asymmetric stretching in cellulose and hemicellulose (Faix and Böttcher | PC1 |
| 13 | 1185 | C–O stretching in Cellulose (Zhou et al. | PC1 |
| 14 | 1225 | OH vibration in guaiacyl ring, C–C, C–O, and C=O stretches in lignin (Chen et al. | – |
| 15 | 1265 | C–O vibration in guaiacyl rings (Popescu et al. | PC3 |
| 16 | 1315 | CH2 wagging in crystalline cellulose (Colom and Carrillo | PC1 |
| 17 | 1335 | CH of methyl groups in methoxy in amorphous cellulose (Colom and Carrillo | – |
| 18 | 1360 | C–H deformation in cellulose and hemicelluloses (Evans et al. | PC1 |
| 19 | 1385 | C–O stretching in cellulose and hemicellulose (Labbé et al. | – |
| 20 | 1405 | C=O in carboxylic groups in carboxylic acid, ester (Zhang et al. | PC2 |
| 21 | 1425 | C–H asymmetric deformation in methoxyl, aromatic skeletal vibrations, lignin (Faix | PC3 |
| 22 | 1465 | C–H asymmetric deformation in methoxyl for lignins, asymmetric in—CH3 and CH2 in pyran for hemicellulose (Popescu et al. | PC3 |
| 23 | 1510 | C=C stretching of the aromatic ring, C=O bond vibrations in extractive compounds (Popescu et al. | PC3 |
| 24 | 1590 | Skeletal vibrations from the C–C (Kubo and Kadla | PC3 |
| 25 | 1610 | C=O stretching conjugated to the aromatic ring, and in carboxylic groups in lignin, carboxylic acid, ester compounds (Zhao et al. | – |
| 26 | 1635 | Absorbed O–H and conjugated C–O in polysaccharides (Genest et al. | – |
| 27 | 1655 | Absorbed O–H and conjugated C–O in polysaccharides (Genest et al. | – |
| 28 | 1690 | C=O vibration in carboxylic group in resin acid (Mizzoni and Cesaro | PC2 |
| 29 | 1730 | C=O carbonyls in ester groups and acetyl group in xylan (Bodirlau and Teaca | PC1 |
aBand assignment related to PCA factors (see Fig. 3: PC1 for polysaccharides, PC2 for terpenoids and PC3 for lignin)
Fig. 3FTIR spectra of individual wood components (extracted resin, isolated lignin and carbohydrates from the difference spectrum of solvent-extracted wood and Klason lignin isolate), and the plot of component scores of the three first extracted factors from principal component analysis applied to the transposed data matrix (samples as variables)
Fig. 2Average spectra (a) and second derivative spectra (b) of the heartwood samples (LSA La Sagra Mountain, LIN01 and LIN03 Linarejos plot 01 and 03, ART Artikutza)
Fig. 4Plot of the canonical functions obtained in the discriminant analysis applied to lignin absorption bands (a) and polysaccharide absorption bands (b)
Fig. 5Plot of the canonical functions obtained by the discriminant analysis with all absorption bands (t for training set and v for validation set)
Fig. 6Boxplot of the discriminant scores of the training set (t) and validation set (v) displaying the accuracy of the discriminant model a: discriminant function 1; b: discriminant function 2. Groups are classified using Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc test (P < 0.001) in ascending order with label (a, b, and c)
Standardized canonical discriminant function coefficients for the DFT
| Bands (cm−1) | DF1T | DF2Total |
|---|---|---|
| 860 | 2.33 | − 0.23 |
| 900 | − 1.56 | 1.44 |
| 1105 | 1.62 | 1.08 |
| 1225 | − 1.13 | − 0.94 |
| 1315 | − 1.83 | − 3.83 |
| 1335 | 1.70 | 5.15 |
| 1385 | 2.21 | 1.11 |
| 1405 | 2.10 | 1.55 |
| 1425 | − 3.44 | − 0.94 |
| 1610 | 1.09 | − 1.31 |
| 1635 | − 4.28 | 0.95 |
| 1655 | 3.52 | − 1.91 |
Fig. 7Boxplot of the ratio for amorphous-to-crystalline cellulose (1315/1335 cm−1) for Pinus nigra trees. Groups are classified using Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc test (P < 0.001) in ascending order (a, b)