Literature DB >> 29496625

The in vivo response to a novel Ti coating compared with polyether ether ketone: evaluation of the periphery and inner surfaces of an implant.

William Robert Walsh1, Matthew H Pelletier2, Chris Christou2, Jiawei He3, Frank Vizesi3, Scott D Boden4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Increasing bone ongrowth and ingrowth of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) interbody fusion devices has the potential to improve clinical outcomes.
PURPOSE: This study evaluated the in vivo response of promoting new bone growth and bone apposition with NanoMetalene (NM) compared with PEEK alone in a cancellous implantation site with an empty aperture. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a randomized control animal study.
METHODS: Implants and funding for this study were provided by SeaSpine (60,000 USD). Cylindrical dowels with two apertures were prepared as PEEK with a sub-micron layer of the titanium (NM). The titanium coating was applied over the entire implant (Group 1) or just the apertures (Group 2). Polyether ether ketone implants with no coating served as controls (Group 3). Implants were placed in the cancellous bone of the distal femur or proximal tibia with no graft material placed in the apertures in eight adult sheep. Bone ongrowth to the surface of the implant and ingrowth into the apertures was assessed at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery with micro-computed tomography (CT) and undecalcified histology.
RESULTS: The apertures in the implants were notably empty in the PEEK group at 4 and 8 weeks. In contrast, new bone formation into the apertures was found in samples coated with NM even though no graft material was placed into the defect. The bone growing into the aperture tracked along the titanium layer. Apertures with the titanium coating demonstrated significantly more bone by micro-CT qualitative grading compared with PEEK with average bone coverage scores of Group 1 (NM) 1.62±0.89, Group 2 (NM apertures only) 1.62±0.77, and Group 3 (PEEK) 0.43±0.51, respectively, at 4 weeks (p<.01) and Group 1 (NM) 1.79±1.19, Group 2 (NM apertures only) 1.98±1.18, and Group 3 (PEEK) 0.69±0.87, respectively, at 8 weeks (p<.05). The amount of bone in the apertures (ingrowth) quantified using the volumetric data from the micro-CT supported an overall increase in bone volume inside the apertures with the titanium coating compared with PEEK. Histology showed newly formed woven bone tracked along the surface of the titanium in the apertures. The PEEK interface presented the typical nonreactive fibrous tissue inside the apertures at 4 weeks and some focal contact with bone on the outside at 4 weeks and 8 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: Micro-CT and histology demonstrated bone ongrowth to the surfaces coated with NM where the newly formed bone tracked along the thin titanium-coated surfaces. Polyether ether ketone surfaces presented the nonreactive fibrous tissue at the interface as previously reported in preclinical scenarios.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal model; Bone ongrowth; Histology; PEEK; Sheep; Spinal fusion; Titanium coating

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29496625     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  10 in total

Review 1.  3-dimensional printing for anterior cervical surgery: a review.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Kevin Phan; William R Walsh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Impact of mechanical stability on the progress of bone ongrowth on the frame surfaces of a titanium-coated PEEK cage and a 3D porous titanium alloy cage: in vivo analysis using CT color mapping.

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Shota Takaneka; Yusuke Sakai; Hideki Yoshikawa; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Safety and efficacy of an electron beam melting technique-manufactured titanium mesh cage for lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Timo Zippelius; Patrick Strube; Farid Suleymanov; Michael Putzier; Alexander Hölzl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Lumbar interbody fusion: recent advances in surgical techniques and bone healing strategies.

Authors:  Bin Meng; Joshua Bunch; Douglas Burton; Jinxi Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Gaseous sulfur trioxide induced controllable sulfonation promoting biomineralization and osseointegration of polyetheretherketone implants.

Authors:  Teng Wan; Zixue Jiao; Min Guo; Zongliang Wang; Yizao Wan; Kaili Lin; Qinyi Liu; Peibiao Zhang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2020-07-04

Review 6.  Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Zhonghan Wang; Yang Wang; Zuhao Li; Bo Chao; Shixian Liu; Wangwang Luo; Jianhang Jiao; Minfei Wu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17

7.  Standalone titanium/polyetheretherketone interbody cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Clinical and radiological results at 24 months.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Tajrian Amin; Kevin Phan; Darweesh Al Khawaja; Wen Jie Choy; William C H Parr; Vedran Lovric; William R Walsh
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2022-03-09

8.  Design a novel integrated screw for minimally invasive atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yingkai Zhang; Cheng Li; Lei Li; Yanyan Sun; Zeqing Li; Yunli Mei; Xinyuan Feng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Comparison of Short-Term Radiographical and Clinical Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With a 3D Porous Titanium Alloy Cage and a Titanium-Coated PEEK Cage.

Authors:  Takahiro Makino; Shota Takenaka; Yusuke Sakai; Hideki Yoshikawa; Takashi Kaito
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-11-18

10.  Facile surface functional polyetheretherketone with antibacterial and immunoregulatory activities for enhanced regeneration toward bacterium-infected bone destruction.

Authors:  An'an Sun; Xi Lin; Zhiqiang Xue; Jiyue Huang; Xinxin Bai; Lingling Huang; Xinhua Lin; Shaohuang Weng; Min Chen
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 6.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.