| Literature DB >> 29495481 |
Jing-Hao Xu1,2, Kuei-Hung Lai3,4, Yin-Di Su5,6, Yu-Chia Chang7,8,9, Bo-Rong Peng10,11,12, Anders Backlund4, Zhi-Hong Wen13, Ping-Jyun Sung14,15,16,17,18.
Abstract
Four new briaraneEntities:
Keywords: Briareum violaceum; COX-2; ChemGPS-NP; briarane; briaviolide; iNOS
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29495481 PMCID: PMC5867619 DOI: 10.3390/md16030075
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Cultured octocoral B. violaceum and structures of briaviolides K–N (1–4), excavatoid F (5), and (1S*,2S*,5Z,7S*,8S*,9S*,10S*,11R*,12R*,13Z,17R*)-2,12-diacetoxy-8,17-epoxy-9-hydroxybriara-5, 13-dien-18-one (6). The 1′2′3′4′ means the serial numbers of the carbon atom of the n-butyrate moiety.
Data of 1H (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C (100 MHz, CDCl3) NMR and 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations for briaviolide K (1).
| Position | δH ( | δC, Multiple | 1H–1H COSY | HMBC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46.5, C | |||
| 2 | 5.17 d (8.0) | 75.4, CH | H2-3 | C-1, C-4, C-15, acetate carbonyl |
| 3α/β | 1.73 m; 2.62 ddd (15.2, 15,2, 6.0) | 32.3, CH2 | H-2, H2-4 | C-4 |
| 4/4′ | 1.95 m; 2.53 br d (15.2) | 28.7, CH2 | H2-3 | C-5, C-6 |
| 5 | 146.2, C | |||
| 6 | 5.29 d (9.2) | 117.4, CH | H-7, H3-16 | n. o. a |
| 7 | 5.37 d (9.2) | 75.1, CH | H-6 | C-5, C-6, C-19 |
| 8 | 70.7, C | |||
| 9 | 5.74 d (2.0) | 68.0, CH | H-10 | C-1, C-7, C-8, C-10, C-11, C-17, |
| acetate carbonyl | ||||
| 10 | 2.34 br s | 44.9, CH | H-9 | C-1, C-8, C-9, C-15, C-20 |
| 11 | 76.0, C | |||
| 12 | 4.85 dd (3.6, 2.4) | 75.0, CH | H2-13 | |
| 13/13′ | 2.01 m; 2.19 m | 24.3, CH2 | H-12, H-14 | C-12 |
| 14 | 4.56 dd (2.8, 2.8) | 74.9, CH | H2-13 | C-1, acetate carbonyl |
| 15 | 1.28 s | 14.8, CH3 | C-1, C-2, C-10, C-14 | |
| 16 | 2.05 br s | 27.0, CH3 | H-6 | C-4, C-5, C-6 |
| 17 | 64.5, C | |||
| 18 | 1.70 s | 10.2, CH3 | C-8, C-17, C-19 | |
| 19 | 170.7, C | |||
| 20 | 1.29 s | 30.0, CH3 | C-10, C-11, C-12 | |
| OAc-2 | 170.4, C | |||
| 1.98 s | 21.5, CH3 | Acetate carbonyl | ||
| OAc-9 | 169.4, C | |||
| 2.22 s | 21.2, CH3 | Acetate carbonyl | ||
| OAc-14 | 170.6, C | |||
| 2.00 s | 21.5, CH3 | Acetate carbonyl | ||
| 172.6, C | ||||
| 2.29 t (7.6) | 36.4, CH2 | H2-3′ | C-1′, C-3′, C-4′ | |
| 1.65 sext (7.6) | 18.3, CH2 | H2-2′, H3-4′ | C-1′, C-2′, C-4′ | |
| 0.95 t (7.6) | 13.7, CH3 | H2-3′ | C-2′, C-3′ | |
| OH-11 | 2.11 s | C-10, C-11, C-12, C-20 |
a n. o. = not observed.
Figure 2Model of 1 generated by computer-aided analyses based on MM2 force field calculations and selected protons with key NOESY correlations.
Data of 1H (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C (100 MHz, CDCl3) NMR and 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations for briaviolide L (2).
| Position | δH ( | δC, Multiple | 1H–1H COSY | HMBC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47.3, C | |||
| 2 | 5.23 d (8.4) | 75.0, CH | H2-3 | C-1, C-4, C-14, C-15, acetate carbonyl |
| 3α/β | 1.69 m; 2.64 ddd (15.2, 15.2, 5.6) | 31.4, CH2 | H-2, H2-4 | C-2 |
| 4/4′ | 1.93 m; 2.49 br d (15.2) | 28.4, CH2 | H2-3 | C-5 |
| 5 | 144.3, C | |||
| 6 | 5.20 d (8.0) | 118.6, CH | H-7, H3-16 | C-5, C-8 |
| 7 | 5.19 d (8.0) | 75.0, CH | H-6 | C-6, C-8 |
| 8 | 70.7, C | |||
| 9 | 5.83 s | 67.4, CH | H-10 | C-1, C-7, C-8, C-10, C-11, C-17, acetate carbonyl |
| 10 | 2.41 s | 45.5, CH | H-9 | C-1, C-2, C-8, C-12, C-14, C-15, C-20 |
| 11 | 73.5, C | |||
| 12 | 4.80 dd (2.8, 2.4) | 73.8, CH | H2-13 | C-10, C-11, C-14, C-20, |
| 13/13′ | 1.96 m; 2.26 m | 25.8, CH2 | H-12, H-14 | C-11, C-12, C-14 |
| 14 | 4.68 dd (2.8, 2.8) | 74.2, CH | H2-13 | C-1, C-10, C-15, acetate carbonyl |
| 15 | 1.22 s | 14.3, CH3 | C-1, C-2, C-10, C-14 | |
| 16 | 1.99 s | 27.2, CH3 | H-6 | C-4, C-5, C-6 |
| 17 | 66.3, C | |||
| 18 | 1.77 s | 10.4, CH3 | C-8, C-17, C-19 | |
| 19 | 170.4, C | |||
| 20 | 1.22 s | 23.2, CH3 | C-10, C-11, C-12 | |
| OAc-2 | 170.1, C | |||
| 1.98 s | 21.4, CH3 | Acetate carbonyl | ||
| OAc-9 | 168.2, C | |||
| 2.22 s | 21.2, CH3 | Acetate carbonyl | ||
| OAc-14 | 170.1, C | |||
| 1.99 s | 21.5, CH3 | Acetate carbonyl | ||
| 172.5, C | ||||
| 2.33 t (7.2) | 36.3, CH2 | H2-3′ | C-1′, C-3′, C-4′ | |
| 1.67 sext (7.2) | 18.3, CH2 | H2-2′, H3-4′ | C-1′, C-2′, C-4′ | |
| 0.97 t (7.2) | 13.7, CH3 | H2-3′ | C-2′, C-3′ | |
| OH-11 | 1.96 s | C-11, C-12, C-20 |
Figure 3Model of 2 generated by computer-aided analyses based on MM2 force field calculations and selected protons with key NOESY correlations.
Data of 1H (500 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C (125 MHz, CDCl3) NMR and 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations for briaviolide M (3).
| Position | δH ( | δC, Multiple | 1H–1H COSY | HMBC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46.1, C | |||
| 2 | 5.07 d (7.5) | 73.0, CH | H2-3 | C-1, C-3, C-4, C-15, |
| acetate carbonyl | ||||
| 3α/β | 2.02 (15.0, 7.5, 5.5); 2.89 dd (15.0, 13.0) | 37.7, CH2 | H-2, H-4 | C-2, C-4, C-5 |
| 4 | 5.08 dd (13.0, 5.5) | 73.0, CH | H2-3 | C-5, C-6, acetate carbonyl |
| 5 | 143.7, C | |||
| 6 | 5.40 d (9.0) | 123.1, CH | H-7 | C-4 |
| 7 | 5.57 d (9.0) | 73.7, CH | H-6 | C-6 |
| 8 | 70.3, C | |||
| 9 | 4.98 br s | 72.5, CH | n. o. b | C-1, C-7, C-8, C-11, C-17, |
| acetate carbonyl | ||||
| 10 | 2.64 dd (5.0, 1.5) | 37.3, CH | H-11 | C-1, C-8, C-11 |
| 11 | 2.04 m | 42.0, CH | H-10, H-12, H3-20 | n. o. |
| 12 | 4.83 ddd (3.5, 3.0, 3.0) | 71.4, CH | H-11, H2-13 | n. o. |
| 13α/β | 1.94 br d (16.0); 2.09 ddd (16.0, 3.0, 3.0) | 25.4, CH2 | H-12, H-14 | n. o. |
| 14 | 4.75 dd (3.0, 3.0) | 73.9, CH | H2-13 | Acetate carbonyl |
| 15 | 1.23 s | 15.4, CH3 | C-1, C-10, C-14 | |
| 16 | 2.17 s | 25.4, CH3 | C-4, C-5, C-6 | |
| 17 | 64.5, C | |||
| 18 | 1.62 s | 10.8, CH3 | C-8, C-17, C-19 | |
| 19 | 170.5, C | |||
| 20 | 1.11 d (7.5) | 15.0, CH3 | C-10, C-11, C-12 | |
| OAc-2 | 170.1, C a | |||
| 2.05 s a | 21.1, CH3 | Acetate carbonyl | ||
| OAc-4 | 170.0, C a | |||
| 2.02 s a | 21.1, CH3 | Acetate carbonyl | ||
| OAc-9 | 168.3, C | |||
| 2.24 s | 21.4, CH3 | Acetate carbonyl | ||
| OAc-14 | 170.0, C a | |||
| 2.00 s a | 21.1, CH3 | Acetate carbonyl | ||
| 173.0, C | ||||
| 2.26 t (7.5) | 36.5, CH2 | H2-3′ | C-1′, C-3′ C-4′ | |
| 1.64 sext (7.5) | 18.5, CH2 | H2-2′, H3-4′ | C-1′, C-2′ C-4′ | |
| 0.96 t (7.5) | 13.7, CH3 | H2-3′ | C-2′, C-3′ |
a data exchangeable; b n. o. = not observed.
Figure 4Model of 3 generated by computer-aided analyses based on MM2 force field calculations and selected protons with key NOESY correlations.
Data of 1H (400 MHz, CDCl3) and 13C (100 MHz, CDCl3) NMR and 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations for briaviolide N (4).
| Position | δH ( | δC, Multiple | 1H–1H COSY | HMBC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.3, C | |||
| 2 | 4.83 d (8.4) | 82.3, CH | H2-3 | C-4, C-10, C-14, acetate carbonyl |
| 3/3′ | 2.27 m, 1.87 m | 22.7, CH2 | H-2, H2-4 | C-1, C-2 |
| 4/4′ | 1.92 m, 2.54 dd (14.8, 4.4) | 24.7, CH2 | H2-3 | C-2, C-5 |
| 5 | 143.1, C | |||
| 6 | 5.34 d (8.8) | 121.0, CH | H-7 | C-4 |
| 7 | 5.65 d (8.8) | 73.7, CH | H-6 | C-5 |
| 8 | 70.9, C | |||
| 9 | 3.73 dd (10.0, 6.0) | 68.5, CH | H-10, OH-9 | C-8, C-11 |
| 10 | 3.49 dd (10.0, 3.6) | 34.6, CH | H-9, H-11 | n. o. a |
| 11 | 2.16 m | 35.7, CH | H-10, H-12, H3-20 | n. o. |
| 12 | 3.92 dd (6.0, 1.6) | 68.2, CH | H-11, H-13 | n. o. |
| 13 | 5.90 dd (10.0, 6.0) | 126.5, CH | H-12, H-14 | n. o. |
| 14 | 5.37 d (10.0) | 138.1, CH | H-13 | C-10, C-12 |
| 15 | 1.20 s | 19.2, CH3 | C-1, C-2, C-10, C-14 | |
| 16 | 1.78 s | 23.4, CH3 | C-4, C-5, C-6 | |
| 17 | 58.5, C | |||
| 18 | 1.60 s | 9.4, CH3 | C-8, C-17, C-19 | |
| 19 | 172.6, C | |||
| 20 | 0.90 d (7.2) | 13.4, CH3 | H-11 | C-10, C-11, C-12 |
| OAc-2 | 167.4, C | |||
| 2.23 s | 20.8, CH3 | Acetate carbonyl | ||
| OH-9 | 4.92 d (6.0) | H-9 | C-8, C-10 |
a n. o. = not observed.
Figure 5Effects of compounds 1–4 on the expression of pro-inflammatory iNOS and COX-2 proteins in murine RAW264.7 macrophage cell. Using immunoblot analysis, briarane 2 was demonstrated to reduce lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced expressions of these two pro- inflammatory proteins. Data were normalized to those of cells treated with LPS alone, and cells treated with dexamethasone (10 μM) were used as a positive control (which has been shown to reduce the levels of iNOS and COX-2 to 36.52% and 6.18%, respectively). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). * Significantly different from cells treated with LPS (p < 0.05).
Effects of briaranes 1–4 on LPS-induced iNOS and COX-2 protein expressions in macrophages.
| Compound | iNOS | COX-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Expression (% of LPS Group) | Expression (% of LPS Group) | |
| Control | 7.08 ± 1.55 | 2.41 ± 0.13 |
| LPS | 100 ± 6.96 | 100 ± 3.26 |
| 1 | 118.02 ± 10.81 | 112.77 ± 20.69 |
| 2 | 46.68 ± 4.56 | 61.81 ± 12.14 |
| 3 | 92.49 ± 14.67 | 101.95 ± 8.22 |
| 4 | 71.49 ± 3.78 | 104.51 ± 4.22 |
| DEX a | 36.52 ± 4.53 | 6.18 ± 1.05 |
a Dexamethasone (DEX, 10 μM) was used as a positive control.
Figure 6ChemGPS-NP-based analysis of the chemical space plotted for a series of briarane-type diterpenoids reported by our lab (red and yellow, which were active in inhibition assays of iNOS and COX-2), as well as previously studied 342 iNOS (light blue) and 2,592 COX-2 (light green) inhibitors sorted from the ChEMBL database. In the score plot of the three dimensions (principle component), PC1 (red) describes the size, shape, and polarizability; PC2 (orange) represents the aromatic- and conjugation-related properties; and PC3 (green) depicts lipophilicity, polarity, and H-bond capacity.