Literature DB >> 29494815

Comparison of acromiohumeral distance in symptomatic and asymptomatic patient shoulders and those of healthy controls.

S Navarro-Ledesma1, A Luque-Suarez2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reduction of the subacromial space has traditionally been linked to rotator cuff pathology. The contribution of this narrowing, both in the development and maintenance of rotator cuff tendinopathy, is still under debate. The objective of the present study was compare the acromiohumeral distance at 0 and 60 degrees of active shoulder abduction in scapular plane, static position, in both symptomatic and contralateral shoulders, between participants with unilateral rotator cuff related shoulder pain, and in asymptomatic participants.
METHOD: This was a cross-sectional observational study. Seventy-six participants with chronic shoulder pain were assessed. Forty participants without shoulder pain were also recruited to compare the acromiohumeral distance with symptomatic participants. The acromiohumeral distance was measured at 0 and 60 degrees of active shoulder abduction in all the groups by ultrasound imaging. Mean differences between symptomatic versus contralateral shoulders, and versus healthy controls, were calculated.
FINDINGS: There were no statistical significant differences (p > .05) in the acromiohumeral distance at 0 degrees of shoulder elevation between the groups. However, significant differences were found at 60° between symptomatic and contralateral shoulder groups (0,51 mm; 95% CI: -0.90 to -0.12). INTERPRETATIONS: Differences in shoulder pain perception at 0° are not attributable to acromiohumeral distance differences. However, treatments focused on increasing AHD at 60° could be prescribed, as a significantly reduced AHD was found in symptomatic shoulders when compared with contralateral shoulders. Further research is needed to determine, not only static differences in AHD, but also dynamic differences.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Musculoskeletal pain; Rehabilitation ultrasound imaging; Shoulder pain

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29494815     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  9 in total

Review 1.  Shoulder kinematics impact subacromial proximities: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Quantifying acromiohumeral distance in elite male field hockey players compared to a non-athletic population.

Authors:  Fran Vanderstukken; Annelies Maenhout; Valentien Spanhove; Nick Jansen; Tom Mertens; Ann Marcelle Cools
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Subacromial impingement anatomy and its association with rotator cuff pathology in women: radiograph and MRI correlation, a retrospective evaluation.

Authors:  Chayanit Sasiponganan; Riham Dessouky; Oganes Ashikyan; Parham Pezeshk; Christopher McCrum; Yin Xi; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Shoulder pain and ultrasound findings: A comparison study of wheelchair athletes, nonathletic wheelchair users, and nonwheelchair users.

Authors:  Jennifer A Soo Hoo; Hyungtaek Kim; Julia Fram; Yen-Sheng Lin; Christopher Page; Imaani Easthausen; Prakash Jayabalan
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.218

5.  Acromiohumeral distance and supraspinatus tendon thickness in people with shoulder impingement syndrome compared to asymptomatic age and gender-matched participants: a case control study.

Authors:  Donald J Hunter; Darren A Rivett; Sharmaine McKiernan; Suzanne J Snodgrass
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Reliability of point-of-care shoulder ultrasound measurements for subacromial impingement in asymptomatic participants.

Authors:  Xiaoning Yuan; Ryan Lowder; Kathelynn Aviles-Wetherell; Christian Skroce; Katherine V Yao; Jennifer Soo Hoo
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-08-17

7.  In vivo effects of two shoulder girdle motor control exercises on acromiohumeral and coracohumeral distances in healthy men.

Authors:  Fernanda B Charry; María Jesús L Martínez; Liliana Rozo; Fernando Jurgensen; Juan Guerrero-Henriquez
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-07-14

8.  No relationship between the acromiohumeral distance and pain in adults with subacromial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Soo Whan Park; Yuan Tai Chen; Lindsay Thompson; Andreas Kjoenoe; Birgit Juul-Kristensen; Vinicius Cavalheri; Leanda McKenna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Supraspinatus tendon thickness and subacromial impingement characteristics in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Tomonobu Ishigaki; Koichiro Yoshino; Motoki Hirokawa; Makoto Sugawara; Masanori Yamanaka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.