Fran Vanderstukken1, Annelies Maenhout2, Valentien Spanhove3, Nick Jansen4, Tom Mertens5, Ann Marcelle Cools3. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: fran.vanderstukken@ugent.be. 2. Occupational Therapy Department, Artevelde University College, Ghent, Belgium. 3. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. 4. AZ Monica, Antwerp, Belgium. 5. Kineworks, Turnhout, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shoulders of elite field hockey players are loaded continuously during play. Frequent high shoulder loading is known to influence certain shoulder variables, such as acromiohumeral distance. However, the influence of elite field hockey play on acromiohumeral distance is not examined yet. OBJECTIVE: To examine the acromiohumeral distance in elite male field hockey players compared to a non-athletic control group. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Fifty male participants were included; 25 elite field hockey players (age: 24.0±2.72 years; weight: 77.2±5.29kg; height; 180.5±5.37cm) and 25 age- and gender matched non-athletes (23.0±2.29 years; weight: 75.7±9.53kg; height: 181.8±5.52cm). A Telemed-Colormaster-128 EXT-IZ device was used to bilaterally obtain ultrasound acromiohumeral distance images at 3 different angles of shoulder abduction in the frontal plane. RESULTS: Field hockey players showed a bilateral larger acromiohumeral distance at 45° (mean difference: 1.46mm [95% CI 0.46; 2.46]; p=0.005) and 60° (mean difference: 1.07mm [95% CI 0.21; 1.93]; p=0.016) compared to controls. In both groups, a significant but clinically less relevant, side difference was established for the acromiohumeral distance at 60° (mean difference: 0.79mm [95% CI 0.21; 1.34]; p=0.009). CONCLUSION: With active shoulder abduction, elite field hockey players show a larger acromiohumeral distance in comparison to non-athletic participants. This may be a protective sport-specific adaptation, to better guard the shoulder from injury. Thus, acromiohumeral distance measurement may help physical therapists/coaches decide which athletes could benefit from specific, additional exercises aimed at enlarging the subacromial space.
BACKGROUND: Shoulders of elite field hockey players are loaded continuously during play. Frequent high shoulder loading is known to influence certain shoulder variables, such as acromiohumeral distance. However, the influence of elite field hockey play on acromiohumeral distance is not examined yet. OBJECTIVE: To examine the acromiohumeral distance in elite male field hockey players compared to a non-athletic control group. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Fifty male participants were included; 25 elite field hockey players (age: 24.0±2.72 years; weight: 77.2±5.29kg; height; 180.5±5.37cm) and 25 age- and gender matched non-athletes (23.0±2.29 years; weight: 75.7±9.53kg; height: 181.8±5.52cm). A Telemed-Colormaster-128 EXT-IZ device was used to bilaterally obtain ultrasound acromiohumeral distance images at 3 different angles of shoulder abduction in the frontal plane. RESULTS: Field hockey players showed a bilateral larger acromiohumeral distance at 45° (mean difference: 1.46mm [95% CI 0.46; 2.46]; p=0.005) and 60° (mean difference: 1.07mm [95% CI 0.21; 1.93]; p=0.016) compared to controls. In both groups, a significant but clinically less relevant, side difference was established for the acromiohumeral distance at 60° (mean difference: 0.79mm [95% CI 0.21; 1.34]; p=0.009). CONCLUSION: With active shoulder abduction, elite field hockey players show a larger acromiohumeral distance in comparison to non-athletic participants. This may be a protective sport-specific adaptation, to better guard the shoulder from injury. Thus, acromiohumeral distance measurement may help physical therapists/coaches decide which athletes could benefit from specific, additional exercises aimed at enlarging the subacromial space.
Authors: Elizabeth E Hibberd; Kevin G Laudner; Kristen L Kucera; David J Berkoff; Bing Yu; Joseph B Myers Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: François Desmeules; Luc Minville; Barbara Riederer; Claude H Côté; Pierre Frémont Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Annelies Maenhout; Valerie Van Eessel; Lieselot Van Dyck; Aagje Vanraes; Ann Cools Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 6.202