Linda Zhang1, Monica Norena2, Anne Gadermann2,3, Anita Hubley4, Lara Russell2, Tim Aubry5, Matthew J To6, Susan Farrell7, Stephen Hwang6,8, Anita Palepu1,2. 1. a Division of General Internal Medicine , Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada. 2. b Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada. 3. c School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada. 4. d Department of Education Counselling Psychology and Special Education , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , British Columbia , Canada. 5. e School of Psychology, University of Ottawa , Ottawa , Ontario , Canada. 6. f Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital , Toronto , Ontario , Canada. 7. g Royal Ottawa Health Care Group , Ottawa , Ontario , Canada. 8. h Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine , University of Toronto , Toronto , Ontario , Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Individuals who are homeless or vulnerably housed have a higher prevalence of concurrent disorders, defined as having a mental health diagnosis and problematic substance use, compared to the general housed population. The study objective was to investigate the effect of having concurrent disorders on health care utilization among homeless or vulnerably housed individuals, using longitudinal data from the Health and Housing in Transition Study. METHODS: In 2009, 1190 homeless or vulnerably housed adults were recruited in Ottawa, Toronto, and Vancouver, Canada. Participants completed baseline interviews and four annual follow-up interviews, providing data on sociodemographics, housing history, mental health diagnoses, problematic drug use with the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10), problematic alcohol use with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), chronic health conditions, and utilization of the following health care services: emergency department (ED), hospitalization, and primary care. Concurrent disorders were defined as the participant having ever received a mental health diagnosis at baseline and having problematic substance use (i.e., DAST-10 ≥ 6 and/or AUDIT ≥ 20) at any time during the study period. Three generalized mixed effects logistic regression models were used to examine the independent association of having concurrent disorders and reporting ED use, hospitalization, or primary care visits in the past 12 months. RESULTS: Among our sample of adults who were homeless or vulnerably housed, 22.6% (n = 261) reported having concurrent disorders at baseline. Individuals with concurrent disorders had significantly higher odds of ED use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.11), hospitalization (AOR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.16-1.81), and primary care visits (AOR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05-1.71) in the past 12 months over the four-year follow-up period, after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent disorders were associated with higher rates of health care utilization when compared to those without concurrent disorders among homeless and vulnerably housed individuals. Comprehensive programs that integrate mental health and addiction services with primary care as well as community-based outreach may better address the unmet health care needs of individuals living with concurrent disorders who are vulnerable to poor health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: Individuals who are homeless or vulnerably housed have a higher prevalence of concurrent disorders, defined as having a mental health diagnosis and problematic substance use, compared to the general housed population. The study objective was to investigate the effect of having concurrent disorders on health care utilization among homeless or vulnerably housed individuals, using longitudinal data from the Health and Housing in Transition Study. METHODS: In 2009, 1190 homeless or vulnerably housed adults were recruited in Ottawa, Toronto, and Vancouver, Canada. Participants completed baseline interviews and four annual follow-up interviews, providing data on sociodemographics, housing history, mental health diagnoses, problematic drug use with the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST-10), problematic alcohol use with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), chronic health conditions, and utilization of the following health care services: emergency department (ED), hospitalization, and primary care. Concurrent disorders were defined as the participant having ever received a mental health diagnosis at baseline and having problematic substance use (i.e., DAST-10 ≥ 6 and/or AUDIT ≥ 20) at any time during the study period. Three generalized mixed effects logistic regression models were used to examine the independent association of having concurrent disorders and reporting ED use, hospitalization, or primary care visits in the past 12 months. RESULTS: Among our sample of adults who were homeless or vulnerably housed, 22.6% (n = 261) reported having concurrent disorders at baseline. Individuals with concurrent disorders had significantly higher odds of ED use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.11), hospitalization (AOR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.16-1.81), and primary care visits (AOR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05-1.71) in the past 12 months over the four-year follow-up period, after adjusting for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent disorders were associated with higher rates of health care utilization when compared to those without concurrent disorders among homeless and vulnerably housed individuals. Comprehensive programs that integrate mental health and addiction services with primary care as well as community-based outreach may better address the unmet health care needs of individuals living with concurrent disorders who are vulnerable to poor health outcomes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health status; acute care; homelessness; primary care; public health policy
Authors: Anne M Gadermann; Mohammad Ehsanul Karim; Monica Norena; Scott D Emerson; Anita M Hubley; Lara B Russell; Rosane Nisenbaum; Stephen W Hwang; Tim Aubry; Anita Palepu Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Elise D Riley; Eric Vittinghoff; Rose M C Kagawa; Maria C Raven; Kellene V Eagen; Alison Cohee; Samantha E Dilworth; Martha Shumway Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Susan E Collins; Silvi C Goldstein; Bow Suprasert; Samantha A M Doerr; Joanne Gliane; Clarissa Song; Victoria E Orfaly; Rddhi Moodliar; Emily M Taylor; Gail Hoffmann Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Allyson L Varley; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; Jocelyn Steward; Erin Stringfellow; Erika L Austin; Adam J Gordon; David Pollio; Aerin deRussy; April Hoge; Lillian Gelberg; Kevin Riggs; Theresa W Kim; Sonia L Rubens; Stefan G Kertesz Journal: Qual Health Res Date: 2020-01-02
Authors: Carly Magee; Monica Norena; Anita M Hubley; Anita Palepu; Stephen W Hwang; Rosane Nisenbaum; Mohammad Ehsanul Karim; Anne Gadermann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Syune Hakobyan; Sara Vazirian; Stephen Lee-Cheong; Michael Krausz; William G Honer; Christian G Schutz Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 4.241