Objective: To determine how accessible health care services are for people who are experiencing homelessness and to understand from their perspectives what impact clinician bias has on the treatment they receive. Methods: Narrative interviews were conducted with 53 homeless/vulnerably housed individuals in Ontario, Canada. Visit history records were subsequently reviewed at 2 local hospitals, for 52 of the interview participants. Results: Of the 53 participants only 28% had a primary care provider in town, an additional 40% had a provider in another town, and 32% had no access to a primary care provider at all. A subset of the individuals were frequent emergency department users, with 15% accounting for 75% of the identified hospital visits, primarily seeking treatment for mental illness, pain, and addictions. When seeking primary care for these 3 issues participants felt medication was overprescribed. Conversely, in emergency care settings participants felt prejudged by clinicians as being drug-seekers. Participants believed they received poor quality care or were denied care for mental illness, chronic pain, and addictions when clinicians were aware of their housing status. Conclusion: Mental illness, chronic pain, and addictions issues were believed by participants to be poorly treated due to clinician bias at the primary, emergency, and acute care levels. Increased access to primary care in the community could better serve this marginalized population and decrease emergency department visits but must be implemented in a way that respects the rights and dignity of this patient population.
Objective: To determine how accessible health care services are for people who are experiencing homelessness and to understand from their perspectives what impact clinician bias has on the treatment they receive. Methods: Narrative interviews were conducted with 53 homeless/vulnerably housed individuals in Ontario, Canada. Visit history records were subsequently reviewed at 2 local hospitals, for 52 of the interview participants. Results: Of the 53 participants only 28% had a primary care provider in town, an additional 40% had a provider in another town, and 32% had no access to a primary care provider at all. A subset of the individuals were frequent emergency department users, with 15% accounting for 75% of the identified hospital visits, primarily seeking treatment for mental illness, pain, and addictions. When seeking primary care for these 3 issues participants felt medication was overprescribed. Conversely, in emergency care settings participants felt prejudged by clinicians as being drug-seekers. Participants believed they received poor quality care or were denied care for mental illness, chronic pain, and addictions when clinicians were aware of their housing status. Conclusion:Mental illness, chronic pain, and addictions issues were believed by participants to be poorly treated due to clinician bias at the primary, emergency, and acute care levels. Increased access to primary care in the community could better serve this marginalized population and decrease emergency department visits but must be implemented in a way that respects the rights and dignity of this patient population.
Authors: Charlotte E Hunter; Anita Palepu; Susan Farrell; Evie Gogosis; Kristen O'Brien; Stephen W Hwang Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2014-11-26
Authors: Jane Topolovec-Vranic; Naomi Ennis; Angela Colantonio; Michael D Cusimano; Stephen W Hwang; Pia Kontos; Donna Ouchterlony; Vicky Stergiopoulos Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-12-08 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Janet M Turan; Melissa A Elafros; Carmen H Logie; Swagata Banik; Bulent Turan; Kaylee B Crockett; Bernice Pescosolido; Sarah M Murray Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Michele Fornaro; Elena Dragioti; Michele De Prisco; Martina Billeci; Anna Maria Mondin; Raffaella Calati; Lee Smith; Simon Hatcher; Mark Kaluzienski; Jess G Fiedorowicz; Marco Solmi; Andrea de Bartolomeis; André F Carvalho Journal: BMC Med Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 11.150
Authors: Sophie Nadia Gaber; Andreas Karlsson Rosenblad; Elisabet Mattsson; Anna Klarare Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 2.742
Authors: Richard Lowrie; Kate Stock; Sharon Lucey; Megan Knapp; Andrea Williamson; Margaret Montgomery; Cian Lombard; Donogh Maguire; Rachael Allan; Rebecca Blair; Vibhu Paudyal; Frances S Mair Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2021-01-07
Authors: Cilia Mejia-Lancheros; James Lachaud; Matthew J To; Patsy Lee; Rosane Nisenbaum; Patricia O'Campo; Vicky Stergiopoulos; Stephen W Hwang Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2021 Jan-Dec