Tammy T Hshieh1,2, Wooram F Jung2, Laura J Grande3,4, Jiaying Chen1, Richard M Stone2, Robert J Soiffer2, Jane A Driver1,2,5, Gregory A Abel2. 1. Division of Aging, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Psychology Service, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: As the population ages, cognitive impairment has promised to become increasingly common among patients with cancer. Little is known about how specific domains of cognitive impairment may be associated with survival among older patients with hematologic cancers. Objective: To determine the prevalence of domain-specific cognitive impairment and its association with overall survival among older patients with blood cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective observational cohort study included all patients 75 years and older who presented for initial consultation in the leukemia, myeloma, or lymphoma clinics of a large tertiary hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, from February 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017. Patients underwent screening for frailty and cognitive dysfunction and were followed up for survival. Exposures: The Clock-in-the-Box (CIB) test was used to screen for executive dysfunction. A 5-word delayed recall test was used to screen for impairment in working memory. The Fried frailty phenotype and Rockwood cumulative deficit model of frailty were also assessed to characterize participants as robust, prefrail, or frail. Results: Among 420 consecutive patients approached, 360 (85.7%) agreed to undergo frailty assessment (232 men [64.4%] and 128 women [35.6%]; mean [SD] age, 79.8 [3.9] years), and 341 of those (94.7%) completed both cognitive screening tests. One hundred twenty-seven patients (35.3%) had probable executive dysfunction on the CIB, and 62 (17.2%) had probable impairment in working memory on the 5-word delayed recall. Impairment in either domain was modestly correlated with the Fried frailty phenotype (CIB, ρ = 0.177; delayed recall, ρ = 0.170; P = .01 for both), and many phenotypically robust patients also had probable cognitive impairment (24 of 104 [23.1%] on CIB and 9 of 104 [8.7%] on delayed recall). Patients with impaired working memory had worse median survival (10.9 [SD, 12.9] vs 12.2 [SD, 14.7] months; log-rank P < .001), including when stratified by indolent cancer (log-rank P = .01) and aggressive cancer (P < .001) and in multivariate analysis when adjusting for age, comorbidities, and disease aggressiveness (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13-0.50). Impaired working memory was also associated with worse survival for those undergoing intensive treatment (log-rank P < .001). Executive dysfunction was associated with worse survival only among patients who underwent intensive treatment (log-rank P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that domains of cognitive dysfunction may be prevalent in older patients with blood cancer and may have differential predictive value for survival. Targeted interventions are needed for this vulnerable patient population.
Importance: As the population ages, cognitive impairment has promised to become increasingly common among patients with cancer. Little is known about how specific domains of cognitive impairment may be associated with survival among older patients with hematologic cancers. Objective: To determine the prevalence of domain-specific cognitive impairment and its association with overall survival among older patients with blood cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective observational cohort study included all patients 75 years and older who presented for initial consultation in the leukemia, myeloma, or lymphoma clinics of a large tertiary hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, from February 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017. Patients underwent screening for frailty and cognitive dysfunction and were followed up for survival. Exposures: The Clock-in-the-Box (CIB) test was used to screen for executive dysfunction. A 5-word delayed recall test was used to screen for impairment in working memory. The Fried frailty phenotype and Rockwood cumulative deficit model of frailty were also assessed to characterize participants as robust, prefrail, or frail. Results: Among 420 consecutive patients approached, 360 (85.7%) agreed to undergo frailty assessment (232 men [64.4%] and 128 women [35.6%]; mean [SD] age, 79.8 [3.9] years), and 341 of those (94.7%) completed both cognitive screening tests. One hundred twenty-seven patients (35.3%) had probable executive dysfunction on the CIB, and 62 (17.2%) had probable impairment in working memory on the 5-word delayed recall. Impairment in either domain was modestly correlated with the Fried frailty phenotype (CIB, ρ = 0.177; delayed recall, ρ = 0.170; P = .01 for both), and many phenotypically robust patients also had probable cognitive impairment (24 of 104 [23.1%] on CIB and 9 of 104 [8.7%] on delayed recall). Patients with impaired working memory had worse median survival (10.9 [SD, 12.9] vs 12.2 [SD, 14.7] months; log-rank P < .001), including when stratified by indolent cancer (log-rank P = .01) and aggressive cancer (P < .001) and in multivariate analysis when adjusting for age, comorbidities, and disease aggressiveness (odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13-0.50). Impaired working memory was also associated with worse survival for those undergoing intensive treatment (log-rank P < .001). Executive dysfunction was associated with worse survival only among patients who underwent intensive treatment (log-rank P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that domains of cognitive dysfunction may be prevalent in older patients with blood cancer and may have differential predictive value for survival. Targeted interventions are needed for this vulnerable patient population.
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Crystal S Denlinger; Jennifer A Ligibel; Madhuri Are; K Scott Baker; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Debra L Friedman; Mindy Goldman; Lee Jones; Allison King; Grace H Ku; Elizabeth Kvale; Terry S Langbaum; Kristin Leonardi-Warren; Mary S McCabe; Michelle Melisko; Jose G Montoya; Kathi Mooney; Mary Ann Morgan; Javid J Moslehi; Tracey O'Connor; Linda Overholser; Electra D Paskett; Muhammad Raza; Karen L Syrjala; Susan G Urba; Mark T Wakabayashi; Phyllis Zee; Nicole R McMillian; Deborah A Freedman-Cass Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Michael A Liu; Tammy Hshieh; Nolan Condron; Martha Wadleigh; Gregory A Abel; Jane A Driver Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Yuji Nishiwaki; Elizabeth Breeze; Liam Smeeth; Christopher J Bulpitt; Ruth Peters; Astrid E Fletcher Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-10-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Kim Bouillon; Mika Kivimaki; Mark Hamer; Severine Sabia; Eleonor I Fransson; Archana Singh-Manoux; Catharine R Gale; G David Batty Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2013-06-21 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Maria Queralt Salas; Eshetu G Atenafu; Ora Bascom; Leeann Wilson; Wilson Lam; Arjun Datt Law; Ivan Pasic; Dennis Dong Hwan Kim; Fotios V Michelis; Zeyad Al-Shaibani; Armin Gerbitz; Auro Viswabandya; Jeffrey Howard Lipton; Jonas Mattsson; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Rajat Kumar Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: D E Anderson; V R Bhatt; K Schmid; S A Holstein; M Lunning; A M Berger; M Rizzo Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Inger Utne; Borghild Løyland; Ellen Karine Grov; Hege Lund Rasmussen; Ann Helen Torstveit; Bruce A Cooper; Judy Mastick; Melissa Mazor; Melisa Wong; Steven M Paul; Yvette P Conley; Thierry Jahan; Christine Ritchie; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Mikkael A Sekeres; Gordon Guyatt; Gregory Abel; Shabbir Alibhai; Jessica K Altman; Rena Buckstein; Hannah Choe; Pinkal Desai; Harry Erba; Christopher S Hourigan; Thomas W LeBlanc; Mark Litzow; Janet MacEachern; Laura C Michaelis; Sudipto Mukherjee; Kristen O'Dwyer; Ashley Rosko; Richard Stone; Arnav Agarwal; L E Colunga-Lozano; Yaping Chang; QiuKui Hao; Romina Brignardello-Petersen Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-08-11
Authors: Kimberly D van der Willik; Michael Hauptmann; Katarzyna Jóźwiak; Elisabeth J Vinke; Rikje Ruiter; Bruno H Stricker; Annette Compter; M Arfan Ikram; Sanne B Schagen Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Thuy T Koll; Amelia Nelson Sheese; Jessica Semin; Weston Ernst; Robin High; Tanya M Wildes; Alfred Fisher; Daniel L Murman Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Kah Poh Loh; Janet A Tooze; Barbara J Nicklas; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Jeff D Williamson; Leslie R Ellis; Bayard L Powell; Timothy S Pardee; Neha G Goyal; Heidi D Klepin Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-04-05 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Reena V Jayani; Allison M Magnuson; Can-Lan Sun; Huiyan Ma; William P Tew; Supriya G Mohile; Ajeet Gajra; Heidi D Klepin; Cary P Gross; Hyman B Muss; Andrew E Chapman; Vani Katheria; Arti Hurria; William Dale Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 3.599