Literature DB >> 15762096

Prospective memory rehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury: a compensatory training programme.

Jennifer M Fleming1, David Shum, Jenny Strong, Sue Lightbody.   

Abstract

PRIMARY
OBJECTIVE: To describe a prospective memory rehabilitation programme based on a compensatory training approach and report the results of three case studies. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Programme evaluation using pre- and post-intervention assessments and telephone follow-up. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Three participants with traumatic brain injury completed 8 weeks of training with 1-2 hour individual sessions. Assessments were formal prospective memory assessment, self-report and measures of diary use. EXPERIMENTAL
INTERVENTIONS: Intervention aimed to identify potential barriers, establish self-awareness of memory deficits, introduce a customized compensatory tool, a cueing system and organizational strategies. A significant other was involved in training to assist generalization. MAIN OUTCOMES AND
RESULTS: All three participants improved on formal prospective memory assessment and demonstrated successful diary use after the programme. Self-report of prospective memory failure fluctuated and may reflect increased self-awareness.
CONCLUSION: A compensatory approach may be useful in improving prospective memory performance following TBI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15762096     DOI: 10.1080/02699050410001720059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Inj        ISSN: 0269-9052            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

Review 1.  Prospective memory training in older adults and its relevance for successful aging.

Authors:  Alexandra Hering; Peter G Rendell; Nathan S Rose; Katharina M Schnitzspahn; Matthias Kliegel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-04-18

2.  Construct validity of the Memory for Intentions Screening Test (MIST) in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Rujvi Kamat; Michael Weinborn; Emily J Kellogg; Romola S Bucks; Aimee Velnoweth; Steven Paul Woods
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2014-04-21

3.  Prospective memory in youth with perinatally-acquired HIV infection.

Authors:  Lynnette L Harris; Miriam C Chernoff; Sharon L Nichols; Paige L Williams; Patricia A Garvie; Cenk Yildirim; Stephen R McCauley; Steven Paul Woods
Journal:  Child Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment and Association With Survival Among Older Patients With Hematologic Cancers.

Authors:  Tammy T Hshieh; Wooram F Jung; Laura J Grande; Jiaying Chen; Richard M Stone; Robert J Soiffer; Jane A Driver; Gregory A Abel
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

5.  The effects of implementation intentions on prospective memory in young and older adults.

Authors:  Yu Wen Koo; David L Neumann; Tamara Ownsworth; David H K Shum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 6.  The assessment and rehabilitation of prospective memory problems in people with neurological disorders: a review.

Authors:  Jessica Fish; Barbara A Wilson; Tom Manly
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Psychometric characteristics of the memory for intentions screening test.

Authors:  Steven Paul Woods; Lisa M Moran; Matthew S Dawson; Catherine L Carey; Igor Grant
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.535

8.  Effects of a Multi-Component Training Program on Healthy Older Adults' Prospective Memory Performance: Assessing Change Over Time.

Authors:  Azin Farzin; Rahimah Ibrahim; Zainal Madon; Hamidon Basri; Shervin Farzin; Abbas Motalebizadeh
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-04-22

9.  Google Calendar: A single case experimental design study of a man with severe memory problems.

Authors:  Victoria N Baldwin; Theresa Powell
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Cognitive and neural plasticity in older adults' prospective memory following training with the Virtual Week computer game.

Authors:  Nathan S Rose; Peter G Rendell; Alexandra Hering; Matthias Kliegel; Gavin M Bidelman; Fergus I M Craik
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.