Literature DB >> 29494729

Association of Reduced Delay in Care With a Dedicated Operating Room in Pediatric Otolaryngology.

Andrew J Redmann1, Kyle Robinette2, Charles M Myer1,3, Alessandro de Alarcón1,3, Aimee Veid3, Catherine K Hart1,3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Obtaining sufficient operating room time for inpatient consults requiring an operative intervention is a persistent challenge for otolaryngologists.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the institution of an otolaryngology-specific operating room (OR) for unscheduled (add-on) cases for its association with time from initial consultation to surgery and, secondarily, to determine utilization of a dedicated block of time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of medical records of a tertiary care pediatric hospital for patients treated between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016; analysis was concluded by June 2016. Included were all patients undergoing inpatient otolaryngology consultations who required nonemergency operative procedures.
INTERVENTIONS: In August 2015, a once-weekly 5-hour block of OR time dedicated to inpatient otolaryngology consults was instituted. Prior to this, cases were placed on an add-on list shared between all surgical services. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: It was hypothesized that institution of a dedicated block of OR time would decrease the time from initial consultation to operative intervention and would be utilized at a high rate. Operating room utilization was calculated by dividing scheduled OR time by actual OR time utilized. Time from initial consultation to OR intervention was compared before and after the institution of the dedicated OR block.
RESULTS: A total of 316 inpatient add-on pediatric cases (including 108 patients from the intensive care unit [ICU]) were scheduled during the study period. The most common cases were microlaryngoscopy/bronchoscopy (79%) and tracheostomy (8%). Mean (SD) time between consultation and OR intervention was 7.8 (1.6) days prior to establishing the add-on OR and 4.4 (1.3) days after it was established (absolute difference of 3.4 days; 95% CI, 3.1-3.7 days). Mean (SD) time between consultation and OR intervention was 7.4 (5.0) days for ICU patients prior to intervention and 5.6 (3.0) days after intervention (absolute difference of 1.8 days; 95% CI, 1.6-2.0 days). Total utilization of the OR block time was 74%, and adjusted utilization was 86%. There was a 15% drop in the number of unscheduled add-on cases after the intervention (from 10 cases/mo to 8.5 cases/mo; absolute difference of 1.5 cases; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9 cases). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Instituting a dedicated otolaryngology add-on OR was associated with significantly reduced time between initial consultation and operative care, by approximately 3 days, decreased the number of unscheduled add-on cases, and was utilized at a high level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29494729      PMCID: PMC5876886          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.3165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  21 in total

1.  Which algorithm for scheduling add-on elective cases maximizes operating room utilization? Use of bin packing algorithms and fuzzy constraints in operating room management.

Authors:  F Dexter; A Macario; R D Traub
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  SQUIRE 2.0-Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence-Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process.

Authors:  Greg Ogrinc; Louise Davies; Daisy Goodman; Paul Batalden; Frank Davidoff; David Stevens
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Method to assist in the scheduling of add-on surgical cases--upper prediction bounds for surgical case durations based on the log-normal distribution.

Authors:  J Zhou; F Dexter
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Does late night hip surgery affect outcome?

Authors:  Aron T Chacko; Miguel A Ramirez; Arun J Ramappa; Lars C Richardson; Paul T Appleton; Edward K Rodriguez
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-08

5.  Analysis of pediatric direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy operative flow: opportunities for improved safety outcomes.

Authors:  Rahul K Shah; Justin Cohen; Anju Patel; Craig Derkay
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-07

6.  The value of the dedicated orthopaedic trauma operating room.

Authors:  Timothy Bhattacharyya; Mark S Vrahas; Suzanne M Morrison; Edward Kim; Richard A Wiklund; R Malcolm Smith; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-06

7.  Benchmarks for the durations of ambulatory surgical procedures in otolaryngology.

Authors:  Neil Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Negative impact of waiting time for primary total knee arthroplasty on satisfaction and patient-reported outcome.

Authors:  Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; Daniel Martinez-Mendez; Fernando A Miralles-Muñoz; Luis Marco-Gomez; Fernando A Lopez-Prats
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Operating room data management: improving efficiency and safety in a surgical block.

Authors:  Vanni Agnoletti; Matteo Buccioli; Emanuele Padovani; Ruggero M Corso; Peter Perger; Emanuele Piraccini; Rebecca Levy Orelli; Stefano Maitan; Davide Dell'amore; Domenico Garcea; Claudio Vicini; Teresa Maria Montella; Giorgio Gambale
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Patient Satisfaction with Wait-Times for Breast Cancer Surgery in Newfoundland and Labrador.

Authors:  Maria Mathews; Dana Ryan; Vereesh Gadag; Roy West
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.