Literature DB >> 29494573

Notes from the Field: Occupational Hazards Associated with Harvesting and Processing Cannabis - Washington, 2015-2016.

Kerton R Victory, James Couch, Brian Lowe, Brett J Green.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29494573      PMCID: PMC5861698          DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6708a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


× No keyword cloud information.
Although the possession, use, and sale of all forms of cannabis are illegal under U.S. federal law, since 2012, multiple states have legalized the retail sale of cannabis for medical and recreational use (). Previous research studies have indicated that Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the principal psychoactive constituent of cannabis, can cause acute and chronic health effects (). However, health effects from long-term occupational exposures to cannabis during harvesting and processing are unknown, in part because most studies have focused primarily on nonoccupational settings (). In June 2015, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) received a request for a Health Hazard Evaluation (HHE) from a representative of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union to evaluate potential health and safety hazards associated with harvesting and processing cannabis at an outdoor farm. In response to the request, NIOSH visited the farm in August and October 2015. The farm was located in Washington; the state had legalized cannabis for medicinal use in 1998 and recreational use in 2012. At the time of the HHE, the farm was operated by the owner and three employees. The 5-acre farm did not use any pesticides and grew cannabis, vegetables, and fruits. During the visit, the owner and all three employees were interviewed about their work, safety, and health concerns. Work practices were observed, and musculoskeletal risk factors for the hands, wrists, and shoulders during harvesting and processing tasks were evaluated. Digital force gauges and pinch gauges were used to assess manual hand forces during destemming, and a CyberGlove electrogoniometer glove (http://www.cyberglovesystems.com/) was used to assess dynamics and repetitive motion of the hand and fingers in trimming. Area and personal air samples were collected to test for gram-negative bacterial lipopolysaccharide (commonly referred to as endotoxin) and to determine bacterial and fungal diversity using 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) and fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region gene sequencing, respectively (). Exposure to these biologic hazards can increase the risk for allergic and respiratory symptoms (). Surface wipe samples were collected and analyzed for Δ9-THC using ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (). The owner and all three employees reported performing several tasks at the farm, including harvesting, bud stripping, and trimming. No one reported hand, wrist, or shoulder symptoms or other musculoskeletal problems. However, employees did express concerns about whether they might develop long-term musculoskeletal problems because of manually hand trimming cannabis. Harvesting tasks were observed and recorded by photograph and video. Analysis indicated that hand trimming of cannabis (Figure) involved low hand forces but was highly repetitive work.
FIGURE

Hand trimming of cannabis flower using scissors while wearing a CyberGlove

Photo/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Hand trimming of cannabis flower using scissors while wearing a CyberGlove Photo/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Personal, full-shift endotoxin air sample concentrations ranged from 2.8 to 37 endotoxin units per cubic meter, which was below the Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational Safety recommended occupational exposure limit of 90 endotoxin units per cubic meter. No U.S. occupational exposure limits for endotoxin are available. Analysis of bacterial diversity revealed outdoor area air samples composed of sequences derived from the phyla Proteobacteria (34%) and Actinobacteria (23%), whereas personal air samples were predominantly composed of sequences derived from the phylum Actinobacteria (47%). In contrast, sequencing of fungal ITS regions revealed a diversity composed of sequences predominantly assigned to the phylum Basidiomycota in outdoor (91%) and drying room samples (70%), whereas personal air samples had a lower fungal diversity predominantly composed of the Ascomycota fungal species, Botrytis cinerea (59%). This fungal species is a well-characterized aeroallergen and plant pathogen of cannabis. Δ9-THC was detected in all 27 surface sample wipes collected in cannabis production areas ranging from 0.17 to 210 μg per 100 cm2. The findings of this HHE indicated that the employees have exposures to highly repetitive work, most notably during hand trimming activities, which increase workers’ risk for musculoskeletal disorders (). Worker exposure to aerosolized Actinobacteria and fungi such as B. cinerea, might also result from processing and hand trimming activities, which can increase the risk for allergic and respiratory symptoms, as has previously been observed in the cannabis processing industry (). Δ9-THC surface wipe concentrations indicated the potential for dermal and ingestion exposures. However, the health implications from long-term occupational exposure to Δ9-THC are unknown. Detailed information is available in the final HHE report (https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/reports/pdfs/2015-0111-3271.pdf). The NIOSH HHE program (https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/hhe/) continues to evaluate potential hazards associated with the harvesting and processing of cannabis and will provide updated recommendations to educate employers and employees on the occupational hazards associated with the harvesting and processing of cannabis plants.
  5 in total

1.  Potential exposures associated with indoor marijuana growing operations.

Authors:  John W Martyny; Kate A Serrano; Joshua W Schaeffer; Mike V Van Dyke
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Evaluating the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use in the United States.

Authors:  Wayne Hall; Michael Lynskey
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Assessment of fungal diversity in a water-damaged office building.

Authors:  Brett J Green; Angela R Lemons; Yeonmi Park; Jean M Cox-Ganser; Ju-Hyeong Park
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 4.  Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the hand and wrist: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and sensorimotor changes.

Authors:  Ann E Barr; Mary F Barbe; Brian D Clark
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Simultaneous ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry determination of amphetamine and amphetamine-like stimulants, cocaine and its metabolites, and a cannabis metabolite in surface water and urban wastewater.

Authors:  Lubertus Bijlsma; Juan V Sancho; Elena Pitarch; Maria Ibáñez; Félix Hernández
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.759

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Cannabis: An Emerging Occupational Allergen?

Authors:  Gordon L Sussman; Donald H Beezhold; John R Cohn; William S Silvers; Joanna S Zeiger; Ajay P Nayak
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  Review of NIOSH Cannabis-Related Health Hazard Evaluations and Research.

Authors:  James R Couch; George Reed Grimes; Brett J Green; Douglas M Wiegand; Bradley King; Mark M Methner
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.179

3.  Allergic and Respiratory Symptoms in Employees of Indoor Cannabis Grow Facilities.

Authors:  Coralynn Sack; Niloufar Ghodsian; Karen Jansen; Brynne Silvey; Christopher D Simpson
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 2.779

4.  Potential occupational and respiratory hazards in a Minnesota cannabis cultivation and processing facility.

Authors:  James R Couch; George R Grimes; Douglas M Wiegand; Brett J Green; Eric K Glassford; Leonard M Zwack; Angela R Lemons; Stephen R Jackson; Donald H Beezhold
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 3.079

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.