| Literature DB >> 29494554 |
Tran Thanh Binh1,2, Vo Phuoc Tuan3,4, Ho Dang Quy Dung5, Pham Huu Tung6, Tran Dinh Tri7, Ngo Phuong Minh Thuan8, Le Quang Tam9, Bui Chi Nam10, Do Anh Giang11, Phan Quoc Hoan12, Tomohisa Uchida13, Tran Thi Huyen Trang14,15, Vu Van Khien16, Yoshio Yamaoka17,18.
Abstract
The Helicobacter pylori-induced burden of gastric cancer varies based on geographical regions and ethnic grouping. Vietnam is a multiethnic country with the highest incidence of gastric cancer in Southeast Asia, but previous studies focused only on the Kinh ethnic group. A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted using 494 volunteers (18-78 years old), from 13 ethnic groups in Daklak and Lao Cai provinces, Vietnam. H. pylori status was determined by multiple tests (rapid urease test, culture, histology, and serology). cagA and vacA genotypes were determined by PCR-based sequencing. The overall H. pylori infection rate was 38.1%. Multivariate analysis showed that variations in geographical region, age, and ethnicity were independent factors associated with the risk of H. pylori acquisition. Therefore, multicenter, multiethnic, population based study is essential to assess the H. pylori prevalence and its burden in the general population. Only the E De ethnicity carried strains with Western-type CagA (82%) and exhibited significantly lower gastric mucosal inflammation compared to other ethnic groups. However, the histological scores of Western-type CagA and East-Asian-type CagA within the E De group showed no significant differences. Thus, in addition to bacterial virulence factors, host factors are likely to be important determinants for gastric mucosal inflammation and contribute to the Asian enigma.Entities:
Keywords: Asian enigma; Helicobacter pylori; molecular epidemiology; virulence factor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29494554 PMCID: PMC5877569 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19030708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Map of Vietnam showing the geographical location and the frequency of the studied minority ethnic groups residing in Daklak and Lao Cai.
The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in a population study, in general, and in Daklak and Lao Cai provinces, in particular.
| Ethnic | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No. of participant (%) | 188 (38.1%) | 494 | |
| Daklak province | |||
| E De | 94 (51.4%) | 183 | |
| Nung | 6 (66.7%) | 9 | |
| Tay | 0 (0%) | 3 | |
| Dao | 0 (0%) | 2 | |
| Van Kieu | 1 (100%) | 1 | |
| Thai | 1 (100%) | 1 | |
| Chinese | 0 (0%) | 1 | |
| Lao Cai province | |||
| H′mong | 40 (38.1%) a | 105 | |
| Nung | 2 (13.3%) a,b | 15 | |
| Tay | 15 (18.8%) a,b | 80 | |
| Dao | 12 (20.7%) a,b | 58 | |
| Xa Pho | 13 (54.2%) | 24 | |
| Day | 1 (20%) | 5 | |
| Ray | 2 (50%) | 4 | |
| Bo Y | 0 (0%) | 2 | |
| Man | 1 (100%) | 1 |
a indicates statistically significant differences when compared with E De at p < 0.05; b indicates statistically significant differences when compared with Nung in Daklak province at p < 0.05.
Risk factors of H. pylori infection in the study population.
| Risk Factor | Crude OR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age group | ||||
| ≤ 29 | 38/118 (32.2%) | 0.72 | 0.45–1.13 | 0.16 |
| 30–39 | 63/156 (40.4%) | 1.15 | 0.77–1.73 | 0.49 |
| 40–49 | 38/107 (35.5%) | 0.87 | 0.54–1.39 | 0.58 |
| 50–59 | 33/67 (49.3%) | 1.70 | 0.98–2.95 | 0.06 |
| ≥ 60 | 16/46 (34.8%) | 0.86 | 0.42–1.68 | 0.75 |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 90/210 (42.9%) | 1.42 | 0.98–2.05 | 0.06 |
| Female | 98/284 (34.5%) | 1.00 | ||
| Geographical location | ||||
| Daklak | 102/200 (51.0%) | 2.52 | 1.73–3.65 | <0.001 |
| Lao Cai | 86/294 (29.3%) | 1.00 | ||
| Ethnicities | ||||
| E De | 94/183 (51.4%) | 2.44 | 1.64–3.62 | <0.001 |
| H′mong | 40/105 (38.1%) | 1.00 | 0.62–1.59 | 1.00 |
| Nung | 8/24 (33.3%) | 0.81 | 0.29–2.04 | 0.67 |
| Tay | 15/83 (18.1%) | 0.30 | 0.16–0.56 | <0.001 |
| Dao | 12/60 (20%) | 0.37 | 0.17–0.73 | 0.002 |
| Xa Pho | 13/24 (54.2%) | 1.99 | 0.87–4.54 | 0.13 |
| Other* | 6/15 (40%) | 0.64 | 0.24–1.68 | 0.5 |
| Marital status | ||||
| Single | 1/3 (33.3%) | 1.00 | ||
| Married | 187/491 (38.1%) | 1.23 | 0.06–73.0 | 1.00 |
| Smoking | ||||
| Yes | 28/81 (34.6%) | 0.84 | 0.49–1.41 | 0.53 |
| No | 160/413 (38.7%) | 1.00 | ||
| Drinking | ||||
| Yes | 55/121 (45.5%) | 1.50 | 0.97–2.32 | 0.07 |
| No | 133/373 (35.7%) | 1.00 |
* include the ethnicities (including Day, Ray, Bo Y, Van Kieu, Thai, Chinese, and Man) with a sample size that is equal or smaller than 5.
Figure 2H. pylori and histology. (A) The distribution of atrophic gastritis (atrophy) and intestinal metaplasia (IM) based on age groups within H. pylori infected subjects. (B) The distribution of OLGA score (high risk: OLGA 2 and 3, and low risk: OLGA 0 and 1) based on age groups within H. pylori-infected subjects.
Comparison of histological scores between H. pylori infected ethnic groups.
| E De (n = 90) | Nung (n = 6) | H’mong (n = 39) | Tay (n = 12) | Dao (n = 9) | Xa Pho (n = 11) | Kinh (n = 103) a | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antrum | ||||||||
| Neutrophil | 1.2 (1) | 2.0 (2) b | 1.7 (2) c | 1.7 (2) d | 1.7 (2) e | 2.0 (2) f | 1.2 (1) | |
| Monocyte | 1.6 (2) | 2.3 (2.5) b | 2.1 (2) c | 2.2 (2) d | 2.0 (2) | 2.2 (2) f | 1.7 (2) | |
| Atrophy | 0.9 (1) | 1.5 (1) | 1.0 (1) | 1.2 (1) | 0.9 (1) | 1.0 (1) | 0.9 (1) | |
| IM | 0.02 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.2 (0) c | 0.2 (0) d | 0.0 (0) | 0.4 (0) f | 0.1 (0) | |
| Corpus | ||||||||
| Neutrophil | 0.8 (1) | 0.8 (1) | 1.0 (1) c | 0.9 (1) | 1.1 (1) | 0.9 (1) | 1.0 (1) g | |
| Monocyte | 0.6 (1) | 0.5 (0.5) | 1.2 (1) c | 1.1 (1) d | 1.2 (1) e | 0.6 (1) | 1.5 (1) g | |
| Atrophy | 0.02 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.2 (0) c | 0.2 (0) d | 0.2 (0) e | 0.0 (0) | 0.6 (1) g | |
| IM | 0.01 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.1 (0) g | |
| OLGA | 0.9 (1) | 1.5 (1) | 1.1 (1) | 1.2 (1) | 0.9 (1) | 1.0 (1) | 1.0 (1) | |
| OLGIM | 0.03 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.2 (0) c | 0.2 (0) d | 0.0 (0) | 0.4 (0) f | 0.2 (0) g | |
a Data obtained from our previous study. b indicates a statistically significant difference between E De and Nung. c indicates a statistically significant difference between E De and H’mong. d indicates a statistically significant difference between E De and Tay. e Indicates a statistically significant difference between E De and Dao. f indicates a statistically significant difference between E De and Xa Pho. g indicates a statistically significant difference between E De and Kinh. Statistically significant difference was determined on the basis of the Mann–Whitney test (p < 0.05).
The distribution of cagA and vacA among minor ethnic group in Daklak and Lao Cai province.
| CagA Type | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western | East Asian | s1m1 | s1m2 | ||
| Daklak (n = 96) | 95 (99%) | 73 (76.8%) | 22 (23.2%) | 78 (81.3%) | 18 (18.8%) |
| E De | 89 (98.9%) | 73 (82%) | 16 (18%) | 74 (82.2%) | 16 (17.8%) |
| Nunga | 4 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (100%) | 2 (50%) | 2 (50%) |
| Van Kieu | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Thai | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Lao Cai (n = 75) | 75 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 75 (100%) | 34 (45.3%) | 39 (52%) |
| H’mong | 39 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 39 (100%) | 17 (43.6%) | 20 (51.3%) |
| Nung a | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) | 2 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Tay a | 12 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 12 (100%) | 7 (41.7%) | 7 (58.3%) |
| Dao a | 9 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (100%) | 4 (44.4%) | 5 (55.6%) |
| Xa Pho | 11 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 11 (100%) | 4 (36.4%) | 7 (63.6%) |
| Ray | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Man | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (100%) | 1 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Total (n = 171) | 170 (99.4%) | 73 (42.9%) | 97 (57.1%) | 112 (65.5%) b | 57 (33.3%) b |
a These groups are present in both Daklak and Lao Cai provinces. b There were four cases with the genotype s1m1m2, and the cases were not listed.
Comparison of histological scores between Western-type CagA and East–Asian-type CagA strains of different ethnic groups.
| Cell Infiltration | Western-Type CagA | East Asian-Type CagA | East Asian-Type CagA | East Asian-Type CagA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Histological scoresMean (median) | ||||
| Antrum | ||||
| Neutrophil | 1.2 (1) | 1.2 (1) | 1.7 (2) a | 1.2 (1) |
| Monocyte | 1.5 (2) | 1.7 (2) | 2.1 (2) a | 1.7 (2) |
| Atrophy | 0.9 (1) | 1.1 (1) | 1.1 (1) | 0.9 (1) |
| IM | 0.03 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.2 (0) a | 0.1 (0) |
| Corpus | ||||
| Neutrophil | 0.8 (1) | 0.6 (1) | 0.9 (1) | 1.0 (1) |
| Monocyte | 0.6 (1) | 0.5 (1) | 1.0 (1) a | 1.5 (2) a |
| Atrophy | 0.02 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.2 (0) a | 0.6 (1) a |
| IM | 0.01 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.1 (0) |
| OLGA | 0.9 (1) | 1.1 (1) | 1.1 (1) | 1.0 (1) |
| OLGIM | 0.04 (0) | 0.0 (0) | 0.2 (0) a | 0.2 (0) a |
a p < 0.05 by Mann–Whitney test when compared with Western type CagA E De.
The association between H. pylori virulence factors and clinical outcomes.
| No. of Samples | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | GU | DU | PU | Gastritis | Total |
| No of culture positive cases | 10 | 6 | 16 | 155 | 171 |
| 10 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 16 (100%) | 154 (99.4%) | 170 (99.4%) | |
| Western-type CagA | 4 (40%) | 2 (33.3%) | 6 (37.5%) | 67 (43.2%) | 73 (42.9%) |
| East-Asian-type CagA | 6 (60%) | 4 (66.7%) | 10 (62.5%) | 87 (56.1%) | 97 (57.1%) |
| 10 (100%) | 6 (100%) | 16 (100%) | 155 (100%) | 171 (100%) | |
| 8 (80%) | 5 (83.3%) | 13 (81.3%) | 99 (63.9%) | 112 (65.5%) | |
| 2 (20%) | 1 (16.7%) | 3 (18.7%) | 54 (34.8%) | 57 (33.3%) | |
| 2 (20%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (12.5%) | 2 (1.3%) | 2 (1.2%) | |
| 8 (80%) | 5 (83.3%) | 13 (81.3%) | 99 (63.9%) | 112 (65.5%) | |
| 2 (20%) | 1 (16.7%) | 0 (0%) | 54 (34.8%) | 57 (33.3%) | |
| 2 (20%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.3%) | 2 (1.2%) | |
| Western-type CagA/ | 4 (40%) | 1 (16.7%) | 5 (31.3%) | 58 (37.4%) | 63 (36.8%) |
| Western-type CagA/ | 0 (0%) | 1 (16.7%) | 1 (6.3%) | 9 (5.8%) | 10 (5.8%) |
| East-Asian-type CagA/ | 4 (40%) | 4 (66.7%) a | 8 (50%) | 40 (25.8%) a | 48 (28.1%) |
| East-Asian-type CagA/ | 2 (20%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 45 (29%) | 47 (27.5%) |
| East-Asian-type CagA/ | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (1.3%) | 2 (1.2%) |
a p = 0.048 by Fisher exact test when compared between DU and gastritis.