Paul Boon1, Elien De Cock1, Ann Mertens1, Eugen Trinka2. 1. Department of Neurology, Reference Center for Refractory Epilepsy, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium. 2. Department of Neurology, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neurostimulation is becoming an increasingly accepted treatment alternative for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are unsuitable surgery candidates. Standardized guidelines on when or how to use the various neurostimulation modalities are lacking. We conducted a systematic review on the currently available neurostimulation modalities primarily with regard to effectiveness and safety. RECENT FINDINGS: For vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), there is moderate-quality evidence for its effectiveness in adults with drug-resistant partial epilepsies. Moderate-to-low-quality evidence supports the efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in patients with DRE. There is moderate-to-very low-quality evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective or well tolerated. For transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS), there are insufficient data to support the efficacy of any of these modalities for DRE. These treatment modalities, nevertheless, appear well tolerated, with no severe adverse events reported. SUMMARY: Head-to-head comparison of treatment modalities such as VNS, DBS and RNS across different epileptic syndromes are required to decide which treatment modality is the most effective for a given patient scenario. Such studies are challenging and it is unlikely that data will be available in the near future. Additional data collection on potentially promising noninvasive neurostimulation modalities like tVNS, TMS, TNS and tDCS is warranted to get a more precise estimate of their therapeutic benefit and long-term safety.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Neurostimulation is becoming an increasingly accepted treatment alternative for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are unsuitable surgery candidates. Standardized guidelines on when or how to use the various neurostimulation modalities are lacking. We conducted a systematic review on the currently available neurostimulation modalities primarily with regard to effectiveness and safety. RECENT FINDINGS: For vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), there is moderate-quality evidence for its effectiveness in adults with drug-resistant partial epilepsies. Moderate-to-low-quality evidence supports the efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in patients with DRE. There is moderate-to-very low-quality evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective or well tolerated. For transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS), there are insufficient data to support the efficacy of any of these modalities for DRE. These treatment modalities, nevertheless, appear well tolerated, with no severe adverse events reported. SUMMARY: Head-to-head comparison of treatment modalities such as VNS, DBS and RNS across different epileptic syndromes are required to decide which treatment modality is the most effective for a given patient scenario. Such studies are challenging and it is unlikely that data will be available in the near future. Additional data collection on potentially promising noninvasive neurostimulation modalities like tVNS, TMS, TNS and tDCS is warranted to get a more precise estimate of their therapeutic benefit and long-term safety.
Authors: Andreas Bahr; Matthias Schneider; Maria Avitha Francis; Hendrik M Lehmann; Igor Barg; Anna-Sophia Buschhoff; Peer Wulff; Thomas Strunskus; Franz Faupel Journal: Biosensors (Basel) Date: 2021-06-23
Authors: Marta Nowakowska; Muammer Üçal; Marios Charalambous; Sofie F M Bhatti; Timothy Denison; Sebastian Meller; Gregory A Worrell; Heidrun Potschka; Holger A Volk Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Graham W Johnson; Leon Y Cai; Saramati Narasimhan; Hernán F J González; Kristin E Wills; Victoria L Morgan; Dario J Englot Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 13.654
Authors: Saramati Narasimhan; Hernán F J González; Graham W Johnson; Kristin E Wills; Danika L Paulo; Victoria L Morgan; Dario J Englot Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 5.408
Authors: Abhijeet Gummadavelli; Dario J Englot; Jason M Schwalb; Chengyuan Wu; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; Joseph Niemat; Jason L Gerrard Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 5.315