Literature DB >> 29493522

Operative Versus Non-operative Treatment of Grade III Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations and the Use of SurgiLig: a Retrospective Review.

Fizan Younis1, Sanil Ajwani1, Asia Bibi1, Eleanor Riley2, Peter J Hughes2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acromioclavicular joint dislocations are common shoulder girdle injuries. The treatment of grade III acromioclavicular joint dislocations is controversial. Furthermore, the literature on the use of the Sur-giligTM synthetic ligament for reconstruction of dislocations is sparse.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review aimed to establish whether operative treatment was superior to non-operative treatment in grade III acromioclavicular joint dislocations treated at our institute over a 5-year period. We also reviewed the effectiveness of reconstruction with SurgiligTM after acute and chronic dislocations across all grades of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients completed full follow-up with grade III dislocations. The mean follow-up in the operated group was 3.56 years and in the non-operated group this was 3.29 years. The mean Oxford Shoul-der Score (OSS) in the operated group was 39.8, whereas the mean OSS in the non-operated group was 45.9 (p=0.01). The mean pain score in the operated group was 2.2, and in the non-operated group this was 1.6. The mean satisfaction score in the operated group was 8.2 and that in the non-operated group was 7.8. There was no statistically significant difference in pain or satisfaction scores. In respect to the cohort treated with Surg-iligTM synthetic ligament, 22 patients across all grades of dislocations had this procedure performed. The mean post-operative Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) was 40.
CONCLUSIONS: 1. Non-operative treatment is not inferior to operative treatment for grade III acromioclavicular joint dislocations. The data from this study demonstrat-ed that the non-operated group had superior Ox-ford Shoul-der Scores that were statistically significant. 2. Additionally, the use of the SurgiligTM ligament appears to be effective in treating both chronic and acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acromioclavicular joint management; dislocation; surgilig

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29493522     DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.8043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ortop Traumatol Rehabil        ISSN: 1509-3492


  4 in total

Review 1.  Current concepts in management of ACJ injuries.

Authors:  Akshay Phadke; Nik Bakti; Rajesh Bawale; Bijayendra Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-04-01

Review 2.  Acromioclavicular joint injuries revisited: Pathoanatomy, pathomechanics, and clinical presentation.

Authors:  W Ben Kibler; Aaron Sciascia
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2022-09-01

3.  The clinical outcome of the 'Surgilig' technique for the reconstruction of acromioclavicular dislocations: A systematic review.

Authors:  Michael-Alexander Malahias; Thomas Sarlikiotis; Emmanouil Brilakis; Dimitrios Gerogiannis; Grigorios Avramidis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-11

4.  Nonoperative Management of Traumatic Acromioclavicular Joint Injury: A Clinical Commentary with Clinical Practice Considerations.

Authors:  Aaron Sciascia; Aaron J Bois; W Ben Kibler
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-04-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.