Frank I Scott1, Gary R Lichtenstein2. 1. Crohn's and Colitis Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1635 Aurora Court, Room 2.031, Mail Stop F735, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. frank.i.scott@ucdenver.edu. 2. Gastroenterology Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 7th Floor South Perelman Building, Room 753, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-4283, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Monoclonal antibodies targeting tumor necrosis factor-alpha, integrin molecules, and interleukin-12/23 have become backbone therapies for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. While clinically effective, these biologic therapies come with significant expense, contributing to overall healthcare spending in the USA. Biosimilars have the potential to significantly reduce expenditures secondary to the use of biologic medications such as infliximab and adalimumab, though their complicated manufacturing process results in inherent differences in structure when compared to the originator compounds. In this article, we review the available literature regarding biosimilars in IBD. RECENT FINDINGS: Several biosimilar agents to infliximab and adalimumab are currently FDA-approved, with many more currently in development. Initial clinical trials for approval have been conducted in one of the original indications for each originator biologic. There are growing data demonstrating similar clinical efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of each of the approved infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars, both through indication extrapolation from other diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, as well observational data in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Further research is ongoing regarding the efficacy and safety of substitution and interchangeability of biosimilars, as well as therapeutic drug monitoring for biosimilar agents. Research to date supports the utilization of reference biologics and biosimilars for new initiators, while additional data are being accrued regarding the interchangeability between these agents.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Monoclonal antibodies targeting tumor necrosis factor-alpha, integrin molecules, and interleukin-12/23 have become backbone therapies for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. While clinically effective, these biologic therapies come with significant expense, contributing to overall healthcare spending in the USA. Biosimilars have the potential to significantly reduce expenditures secondary to the use of biologic medications such as infliximab and adalimumab, though their complicated manufacturing process results in inherent differences in structure when compared to the originator compounds. In this article, we review the available literature regarding biosimilars in IBD. RECENT FINDINGS: Several biosimilar agents to infliximab and adalimumab are currently FDA-approved, with many more currently in development. Initial clinical trials for approval have been conducted in one of the original indications for each originator biologic. There are growing data demonstrating similar clinical efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of each of the approved infliximab and adalimumab biosimilars, both through indication extrapolation from other diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, as well observational data in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Further research is ongoing regarding the efficacy and safety of substitution and interchangeability of biosimilars, as well as therapeutic drug monitoring for biosimilar agents. Research to date supports the utilization of reference biologics and biosimilars for new initiators, while additional data are being accrued regarding the interchangeability between these agents.
Authors: Richard J Farrell; Mazen Alsahli; Yoon-Tae Jeen; Kenneth R Falchuk; Mark A Peppercorn; Pierre Michetti Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: J Sieczkowska; D Jarzębicka; A Banaszkiewicz; A Plocek; A Gawronska; E Toporowska-Kowalska; G Oracz; M Meglicka; J Kierkus Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Klaudia Farkas; Mariann Rutka; Petra A Golovics; Zsuzsanna Végh; Barbara D Lovász; Tibor Nyári; Krisztina B Gecse; Martin Kolar; Martin Bortlik; Dana Duricova; Nadezda Machkova; Veronika Hruba; Martin Lukas; Katarina Mitrova; Karin Malickova; Anita Bálint; Ferenc Nagy; Renáta Bor; Ágnes Milassin; Zoltán Szepes; Károly Palatka; Péter L Lakatos; Milan Lukas; Tamás Molnár Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Yoon Suk Jung; Dong Il Park; Young Ho Kim; Ji Hyun Lee; Pyoung Ju Seo; Jae Hee Cheon; Hyoun Woo Kang; Ji Won Kim Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Filip Baert; Maja Noman; Severine Vermeire; Gert Van Assche; Geert D' Haens; An Carbonez; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-02-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen B Hanauer; Brian G Feagan; Gary R Lichtenstein; Lloyd F Mayer; S Schreiber; Jean Frederic Colombel; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Douglas C Wolf; Allan Olson; Weihang Bao; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-05-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Krisztina B Gecse; Barbara D Lovász; Klaudia Farkas; János Banai; László Bene; Beáta Gasztonyi; Petra Anna Golovics; Tünde Kristóf; László Lakatos; Ágnes Anna Csontos; Márk Juhász; Ferenc Nagy; Károly Palatka; Mária Papp; Árpád Patai; Lilla Lakner; Ágnes Salamon; Tamás Szamosi; Zoltán Szepes; Gábor T Tóth; Áron Vincze; Balázs Szalay; Tamás Molnár; Péter L Lakatos Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Frank I Scott; Michelle Luo; Yash Shah; Karen Lasch; Ravy K Vajravelu; Ronac Mamtani; Blair Fennimore; Mark E Gerich; James D Lewis Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2020-06-19 Impact factor: 9.071