| Literature DB >> 29491438 |
Jianqing Tian1, Dan Zhu2,3, Jinzhi Wang4, Bing Wu1, Muzammil Hussain1, Xingzhong Liu5.
Abstract
Dispersal limitation and environmental filtering are two primary processes involved in shaping microbial community structure. The pristine environmental and geographical relatively isolation of small lakes distributed in the Headwater Region of Yellow River (HRYR) offer a unique opportunity to test the relative roles of these two processes on fungal communities. Here, we investigated the fungal community in sediment samples from 10 lakes located in the HRYR using high-throughput sequencing. The results showed that the fungal community was dominated by Sordariomycetes, Leotiomycetes, Dothideomycetes, Pezizomycetes and Agaricomycetes. The results revealed that altitude, mean annual temperature, C/N ration, dissolve organic carbon and total nitrogen were the best predictors for shaping fungal community structure in these lakes. Significant spatial and environmental distance decay relationships in the fungal community were detected. The partial Mantel test indicated that the fungal community structure was significantly correlated with environmental distance but not with geographic distance. Overall, environmental filtering plays a more important role than dispersal limitation in fungal community structure at a local scale in such an pristine and isolated region.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29491438 PMCID: PMC5830880 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21995-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Ten sampling sites across the Headwater Region of the Yellow River, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Detailed information of sampling sites is listed in Table 1. The figure was generated using Arcgis 10.3 software (http://www.esri.com/arcgis/about-arcgis).
Characteristics of sampling sites and soil properties in sediment samples from the headwater region of the Yellow River
| Site code | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude (m) | pH | TC (g/kg) | DOC (g/kg) | TN(g/kg) | MAT (°C) | Lake area (km2) | Shannon index | Chao1 | OTU number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 S | 34°56′29.64″ | 97°35′17.23″ | 4284 | 8.34 | 25.2 ± 3.2 | 22.6 ± 2.2 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | −4.6 | 610.7 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 123.9 ± 11.4 | 111 ± 9 |
| 2 S | 35°00′26.28″ | 97°13′32.17″ | 4299 | 8.33 | 17.9 ± 9.5 | 15.4 ± 5.9 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | −4.6 | 526 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | 140.8 ± 74.5 | 133 ± 49 |
| 3 S | 34°51′22.30″ | 98°07′52.26″ | 4219 | 8.04 | 30.9 ± 7.5 | 26.3 ± 4.6 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | −4.1 | 4.7 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 87.2 ± 12.7 | 77 ± 5 |
| 4 S | 34°38′38.45″ | 98°03′04.66″ | 4221 | 7.97 | 41.2 ± 9.4 | 34.6 ± 2.1 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | −4.1 | 2.9 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 94.0 ± 6.1 | 80 ± 2 |
| 5 S | 34°19′09.43″ | 98°37′13.24″ | 4179 | 7.93 | 34.8 ± 2.6 | 31.2 ± 1.5 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | −4.0 | 33.1 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 139.5 ± 21.3 | 112 ± 11 |
| 6 S | 34°23′09.66″ | 98°31′02.06 | 4186 | 7.71 | 13.7 ± 7.5 | 11.8 ± 4.5 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | −4.0 | 15 | 2.4 ± 0.3 | 70.4 ± 10.3 | 59 ± 5 |
| 7 S | 34°32′32.80″ | 98°19′52.50″ | 4200 | 7.93 | 17.2 ± 3.0 | 14.7 ± 1.9 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | −4.1 | 22.7 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 105.5 ± 23.9 | 72 ± 2 |
| 8 S | 34°40′33.46″ | 98°04′17.92″ | 4225 | 8.01 | 34.0 ± 15.8 | 29.2 ± 9.5 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | −4.1 | 19 | 2.6 ± 0.4 | 116.8 ± 39.3 | 83 ± 11 |
| 9 S | 34°49′53.56″ | 98°23′16.47″ | 4218 | 8.13 | 39.7 ± 20.3 | 33.8 ± 12.5 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | −4.1 | 10.5 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 92.4 ± 24.6 | 76 ± 8 |
| 12 S | 35°18′09.01″ | 98°39′09.65″ | 4090 | 8.84 | 7.28 ± 4.8 | 6.3 ± 2.9 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | −4.1 | 6 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 118.2 ± 30.9 | 102 ± 19 |
TC: Total carbon; DOC: dissolve organic carbon; TN: total nitrogen; MAT: mean annual temperature.
Figure 2Percent abundance of fungal taxa detected in soil sediments from lakes distributed in the headwater region of the yellow river.
Figure 3Relationships between fungal richness, relative abundances of fungal groups and sediment pH. (A). Relationship between sediment pH and fungal richness (i.e OTU numbers). (B) Relationship between sediment pH and relative abundance of Basidiomycota. Linear regressions were used to test Pearson correlation between each taxon’s relative abundance and pH.
Figure 4Distance-decay curves for the fungal communities. (A) Distance-decay for fungal community along geographical distance. The black line denotes the linear regression across all spatial scales. The colorful lines indicate separate regressions within each of the three spatial scales: 0–50 km, 50–100 km, 100–150 km. The slopes of all lines (except the solid red blue line) are significantly less than zero. The slopes of the green and blue lines are significantly different from the slope of the all scale (black solid) line. (B) Distance-decay for fungal community along environmental distance.
Results of Mantel and partial Mantel tests for the correlation between fungal community similarity and environmental distance (Euclidean), and between fungal community similarity and geographical distance. Statistical significance for each partial Mantel correlation value is given in parentheses.
| Mantel test | Partial Mantel test | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental distance | ||
| Geographical distance | −0.09(0.10) |
Figure 5Variation partition analysis to determine an effect of geographic distance and environmental variables on the fungal communities.