Literature DB >> 29488046

Chemosensory cues of predators and competitors influence search for refuge in fruit by the coconut mite Aceria guerreronis.

Érica C Calvet1, Debora B Lima2, José W S Melo3, Manoel G C Gondim2.   

Abstract

Organisms are adapted to recognize environmental cues that can provide information about predation risk or competition. Non-vagrant eriophyoid mites mainly avoid predation by using habitats that are difficult for predators to access (galls or confined spaces in plants) such as the meristematic region of the coconut fruit, which is inhabited by the phytophagous mites Aceria guerreronis and Steneotarsonemus concavuscutum. The objective of this study was to investigate the response of A. guerreronis to cues from the predators Neoseiulus baraki and Amblyseius largoensis in coconut fruits, cues from conspecifics (A. guerreronis injured) and cues from the phytophage S. concavuscutum. The test was carried out through the release of about 300 A. guerreronis on coconut fruits previously treated with cues from predators, conspecific or heterospecific phytophagous. We also observed the walking behaviour of A. guerreronis exposed to the same chemical cues using a video tracking system. The infestation of fruits by A. guerreronis was greater in the presence of predator cues and reduced in the presence of S. concavuscutum cues, but cues from injured conspecifics did not interfere in the infestation process. In addition, the cues also altered the walking parameters of A. guerreronis: it walked more in response to cues from predators and the heterospecific phytophage. Aceria guerreronis spent more time in activity in the treatments with clues than in the control treatment. These results suggest that A. guerreronis recognizes cues from predators and competitors and modifies its behaviour to increase its fitness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-predator behaviour; Competition; Infestation; Risk of predation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29488046     DOI: 10.1007/s10493-018-0233-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  23 in total

1.  Limitations of Neoseiulus baraki and Proctolaelaps bickleyi as control agents of Aceria guerreronis.

Authors:  Debora B Lima; José Wagner da Silva Melo; Manoel G C Gondim; Gilberto J De Moraes
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Olfactory response of predatory mites to vegetative and reproductive parts of coconut palm infested by Aceria guerreronis.

Authors:  José Wagner S Melo; Debora B Lima; Angelo Pallini; José Eudes M Oliveira; Manoel G C Gondim
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Predator performance is impaired by the presence of a second prey species.

Authors:  D B Lima; H K V Oliveira; J W S Melo; M G C Gondim; M Sabelis; A Pallini; A Janssen
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 1.750

4.  Predators induce egg retention in prey.

Authors:  Marta Montserrat; Cristina Bas; Sara Magalhães; Maurice W Sabelis; André M de Roos; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Diet of a polyphagous arthropod predator affects refuge seeking of its thrips prey.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Tiger moth jams bat sonar.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Jesse R Barber; William E Conner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  From repulsion to attraction: species- and spatial context-dependent threat sensitive response of the spider mite Tetranychus urticae to predatory mite cues.

Authors:  M Celeste Fernández Ferrari; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-05-04

8.  Why are predator urines aversive to prey?

Authors:  D L Nolte; J R Mason; G Epple; E Aronov; D L Campbell
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Smells familiar: group-joining decisions of predatory mites are mediated by olfactory cues of social familiarity.

Authors:  Muluken G Muleta; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Antipredator behaviours of a spider mite in response to cues of dangerous and harmless predators.

Authors:  Cleide Rosa Dias; Ana Maria Guimarães Bernardo; Jussara Mencalha; Caelum Woods Carvalho Freitas; Renato Almeida Sarmento; Angelo Pallini; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.132

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Bugs scaring bugs: enemy-risk effects in biological control systems.

Authors:  Michael Culshaw-Maurer; Andrew Sih; Jay A Rosenheim
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 9.492

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.