Literature DB >> 25110288

An in vitro biofilm model associated to dental implants: structural and quantitative analysis of in vitro biofilm formation on different dental implant surfaces.

M C Sánchez1, A Llama-Palacios1, E Fernández1, E Figuero1, M J Marín1, R León2, V Blanc2, D Herrera3, M Sanz4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The impact of implant surfaces in dental biofilm development is presently unknown. The aim of this investigation was to assess in vitro the development of a complex biofilm model on titanium and zirconium implant surfaces, and to compare it with the same biofilm formed on hydroxyapatite surface.
METHODS: Six standard reference strains were used to develop an in vitro biofilm over sterile titanium, zirconium and hydroxyapatite discs, coated with saliva within the wells of pre-sterilized polystyrene tissue culture plates. The selected species used represent initial (Streptococcus oralis and Actinomyces naeslundii), early (Veillonella parvula), secondary (Fusobacterium nucleatum) and late colonizers (Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans). The developed biofilms (growth time 1 to 120h) were studied with confocal laser scanning microscopy using a vital fluorescence technique and with low-temperature scanning electron microscopy. The number (colony forming units/biofilm) and kinetics of the bacteria within the biofilm were studied with quantitative PCR (qPCR). As outcome variables, the biofilm thickness, the percentage of cell vitality and the number of bacteria were compared using the analysis of variance.
RESULTS: The bacteria adhered and matured within the biofilm over the three surfaces with similar dynamics. Different surfaces, however, demonstrated differences both in the thickness, deposition of the extracellular polysaccharide matrix as well as in the organization of the bacterial cells. SIGNIFICANCE: While the formation and dynamics of an in vitro biofilm model was similar irrespective of the surface of inoculation (hydroxyapatite, titanium or zirconium), there were significant differences in regards to the biofilm thickness and three-dimensional structure.
Copyright © 2014 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLSM; Hydroxyapatite; LTSEM; Peri-implant biofilm; Titanium; Zirconium; qPCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25110288     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  18 in total

1.  In vitro evaluation of a multispecies oral biofilm over antibacterial coated titanium surfaces.

Authors:  Javi Vilarrasa; Luis M Delgado; Marta Galofré; Gerard Àlvarez; Deborah Violant; José María Manero; Vanessa Blanc; F Javier Gil; José Nart
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Novel multifunctional dental bonding agent for Class-V restorations to inhibit periodontal biofilms.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Chunyan Li; Michael D Weir; Ke Zhang; Yanmin Zhou; Hockin H K Xu; Mark A Reynolds
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 3.361

3.  Biofilms Developed on Dental Implant Titanium Surfaces with Different Roughness: Comparison Between In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.

Authors:  Lorenzo Bevilacqua; Annalisa Milan; Veronica Del Lupo; Michele Maglione; Lucilla Dolzani
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Succession of oral bacterial colonizers on dental implant materials: An in vitro biofilm model.

Authors:  Danyal A Siddiqui; Alikhan B Fidai; Smriti G Natarajan; Danieli C Rodrigues
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 5.  Environmental, Microbiological, and Immunological Features of Bacterial Biofilms Associated with Implanted Medical Devices.

Authors:  Marina Caldara; Cristina Belgiovine; Eleonora Secchi; Roberto Rusconi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 50.129

6.  In Vitro Evaluation of Planktonic Growth on Experimental Cement-Retained Titanium Surfaces.

Authors:  Nur Balci; Umut Cakan; Burak Aksu; Oncu Akgul; Nurver Ulger
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-04-08

7.  Safety and efficacy of PLGA(Ag-Fe3O4)-coated dental implants in inhibiting bacteria adherence and osteogenic inducement under a magnetic field.

Authors:  Yaping Yang; Shuangshuang Ren; Xuan Zhang; Yijun Yu; Chao Liu; Jie Yang; Leiying Miao
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-06-28

Review 8.  Coatings as the useful drug delivery system for the prevention of implant-related infections.

Authors:  Chenhao Pan; Zubin Zhou; Xiaowei Yu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Osteoblast integration of dental implant materials after challenge by sub-gingival pathogens: a co-culture study in vitro.

Authors:  Bingran Zhao; Henny C van der Mei; Minie Rustema-Abbing; Henk J Busscher; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 6.344

10.  Antibiofilm peptides against biofilms on titanium and hydroxyapatite surfaces.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Markus Haapasalo; Yuan Gao; Jingzhi Ma; Ya Shen
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2018-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.