| Literature DB >> 29487863 |
Qiyan Wang1, Hui Meng2, Qian Zhang1, Tianjiao Shi1, Xuefeng Zhang1, Mingyan Shao1, Linghui Lu3, Jing Wang4, Wei Wang3, Chun Li2, Yong Wang1.
Abstract
Danqi pill (DQP) is a widely prescribed traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. The objective of this study is to systematically characterize altered gene expression pattern induced by myocardial ischemia (MI) in a rat model and to investigate the effects of DQP on global gene expression. Global mRNA expression was measured. Differentially expressed genes among the sham group, model group, and DQP group were analyzed. The gene ontology enrichment analysis and pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes were carried out. We quantified 10,813 genes. Compared with the sham group, expressions of 339 genes were upregulated and 177 genes were downregulated in the model group. The upregulated genes were enriched in extracellular matrix organization, response to wounding, and defense response pathways. Downregulated genes were enriched in fatty acid metabolism, pyruvate metabolism, PPAR signaling pathways, and so forth. This indicated that energy metabolic disorders occurred in rats with MI. In the DQP group, expressions of genes in the altered pathways were regulated back towards normal levels. DQP reversed expression of 313 of the 516 differentially expressed genes in the model group. This study provides insight into the multitarget mechanism of TCM in the treatment of complex diseases.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29487863 PMCID: PMC5816862 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9469670
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Genomics ISSN: 2314-436X Impact factor: 2.326
Nucleotide sequences of primers used in real-time PCR.
| Gene | Primers | Lengths (bp) | Temp (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LPL | CGCTCCATCCATCTCTTC | 159 | 49.8 |
| GGCTCTGACCTTGTTGAT | 49.2 | ||
| ACSL1 | GCAGTTCATCGGCATCTT | 109 | 50.6 |
| GGTTCCAAGCGTGTCATA | 49.8 | ||
| ACADM | ATTACGGAAGAGTTGGCATA | 166 | 54.15 |
| GTTCTGTCACGCAGTAGG | 55.12 | ||
| ME1 | AAGAACCTAGAAGCCATTGT | 104 | 54.23 |
| GCAGCCATATCCTTGAGAA | 54.62 | ||
| TFB2M | AGAATGCGGATGGAGAGT | 141 | 55.20 |
| CTGCTGACCAAGGAACTG | 55.27 | ||
| MMP2 | AAGTCTGAAGAGTGTGAAGT | 180 | 53.86 |
| GTGAAGGAGAAGGCTGATT | 54.45 | ||
| ALOX15 | CTCAGGCTTGCTACTTCAT | 158 | 54.57 |
| CTTCTCCATTGTTGCTTCC | 53.97 | ||
| BAX | GATGATTGCTGATGTGGATAC | 86 | 50.50 |
| AGTTGAAGTTGCCGTCTG | 50.40 | ||
| GPX1 | CAATCAGTTCGGACATCAG | 133 | 53.52 |
| AGCCTTCTCACCATTCAC | 54.14 | ||
| MMP23 | GATGGTCCTACAGGTGAAC | 195 | 54.59 |
| CTGGTCTTGCTGTGAGTG | 55.30 | ||
| GAPDH | TTCAACGGCACAGTCAAG | 116 | 50.70 |
| TACTCAGCACCAGCATCA | 50.50 |
Figure 1Indicators of heart functions in three groups of rats. LVEF, LVFS, LVID;s, and LVID;d in the model group were significantly changed compared with those in the sham group (N = 10 in each group, P < 0.01). In the DQP-treated group, LVEF and LVFS were significantly upregulated compared with the model group (P < 0.05). LVID;d and LVID;s in the DQP-treated group were also downregulated, though the difference of LVID;d was not statistically significant. ∗∗P < 0.01 versus sham group; #P < 0.05 versus model group; ##P < 0.01 versus model group.
Figure 2Expression abundance changes. (a) Top 20 genes upregulated in the model group compared with the sham-operated group and their expression abundances in the DQP-treated group. (b) Top 20 genes downregulated in the model group and their expression abundances in the DQP-treated group.
Significantly enriched KEGG pathways among upregulated and downregulated genes in ischemic heart. The pathways are ranked according to the order of the increasing P values. Gene count referred to the number of genes among all the pathway member genes.
| KEGG pathway ID and name | Gene count |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upregulated | rno04610: complement and coagulation cascades | 11 | 4.59 |
| rno04670: leukocyte transendothelial migration | 9 | 0.001 | |
| rno05322: systemic lupus erythematosus | 8 | 0.001 | |
| rno04510: focal adhesion | 11 | 0.003 | |
| rno04512: ECM-receptor interaction | 7 | 0.004 | |
| rno05200: pathways in cancer | 14 | 0.005 | |
| rno05414: dilated cardiomyopathy | 7 | 0.006 | |
|
| |||
| Downregulated | rno00071: fatty acid metabolism | 6 | 7.55 |
| rno00280: valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation | 6 | 1.18 | |
| rno00620: pyruvate metabolism | 5 | 7.45 | |
| rno03320: PPAR signaling pathway | 6 | 9.11 | |
| rno00330: arginine and proline metabolism | 4 | 0.018834 | |
| rno00020: citrate cycle (TCA cycle) | 3 | 0.04066 | |
| rno05412: arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy | 4 | 0.044529 | |
| rno00640: propanoate metabolism | 3 | 0.048358 | |
| rno00071: fatty acid metabolism | 6 | 7.55 | |
| rno00280: valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation | 6 | 1.18 | |
Top ten significantly enriched GO biological processes among upregulated and downregulated genes in ischemic heart. The GO terms are ranked according to the order of the increasing P values. Gene count referred to the number of genes among all the GO member genes.
| Gene ontology ID and terms | Gene count |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upregulated | GO:0009611~response to wounding | 39 | 4.65 |
| GO:0030198~extracellular matrix organization | 16 | 6.64 | |
| GO:0001501~skeletal system development | 24 | 7.24 | |
| GO:0060348~bone development | 17 | 1.11 | |
| GO:0032535~regulation of cellular component size | 22 | 1.92 | |
| GO:0001503~ossification | 16 | 2.21 | |
| GO:0001558~regulation of cell growth | 19 | 2.34 | |
| GO:0040008~regulation of growth | 24 | 7.57 | |
| GO:0043062~extracellular structure organization | 16 | 4.00 | |
| GO:0008361~regulation of cell size | 18 | 6.08 | |
|
| |||
| Downregulated | GO:0006091~generation of precursor metabolites and energy | 12 | 1.60 |
| GO:0044275~cellular carbohydrate catabolic process | 7 | 6.08 | |
| GO:0006007~glucose catabolic process | 6 | 2.01 | |
| GO:0055114~oxidation reduction | 17 | 2.14 | |
| GO:0046365~monosaccharide catabolic process | 6 | 2.37 | |
| GO:0019320~hexose catabolic process | 6 | 2.37 | |
| GO:0046395~carboxylic acid catabolic process | 7 | 3.17 | |
| GO:0016054~organic acid catabolic process | 7 | 3.17 | |
| GO:0016052~carbohydrate catabolic process | 7 | 3.36 | |
| GO:0043648~dicarboxylic acid metabolic process | 5 | 4.94 | |
Enriched downregulated pathways and biological processes by DQP treatment.
| Term | % |
| Genes |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEGG pathway | |||
|
| 3.6 | 0.000015 | C1QA, C1QB, C5AR1, LOC498276, CFH, RT1-DMA, C1QC |
| Phagosome | 4.1 | 0.003 | ACTB, RAB5C, NCF4, LOC498276, SCARB1, RT1-DMA, TUBA1C, SEC61A1 |
| Complement and coagulation cascades | 2.6 | 0.006 | C1QA, C1QB, C5AR1, CFH, C1QC |
| African trypanosomiasis | 2.1 | 0.006 | VCAM1, F2RL1, LOC100134871, HBB |
| Leukocyte transendothelial migration | 3.1 | 0.007 | ACTB, VCAM1, MYL7, NCF4, CLDN5, MMP2 |
| Tuberculosis | 3.6 | 0.010 | LSP1, RAB5C, LOC498276, TGFB3, FCER1G, RT1-DMA, LBP |
| Platelet activation | 3.1 | 0.011 | ACTB, GP1BB, LOC498276, COL3A1, FCER1G, COL5A2 |
| ECM-receptor interaction | 2.6 | 0.012 | GP1BB, COL3A1, COL5A2, SPP1, FN1 |
| Glutathione metabolism | 2.1 | 0.020 | GSTA3, GPX3, GSTT1, GPX7 |
| Malaria | 2.1 | 0.021 | VCAM1, LOC100134871, TGFB3, HBB |
|
| |||
| GO_biological process | |||
| Cell adhesion | 6.7 | 0.000017 | IGFBP7, COL16A1, VCAM1, WISP2, CTGF, GP1BB, FBLN5, VCAN, GPNMB, SPON1, FN1, AOC3, SPP1 |
| Regulation of cell growth | 3.6 | 0.000045 | WISP2, CREB3, CTGF, IGFBP7, FBLN5, IGFBP6, IGFBP4 |
| Aging | 6.2 | 0.00042 | VCAM1, C1QB, GSTA3, LITAF, CTGF, ELN, COL3A1, TGFB3, TIMP2, TIMP3, MMP2, AOC3 |
| Collagen fibril organization | 2.6 | 0.001 | COL3A1, LOXL2, COL5A2, ANXA2, DPT |
| Positive regulation of fibroblast proliferation | 3.1 | 0.001 | FBLN1, TGIF1, AQP1, MYC, ANXA2, FN1 |
| Integrin-mediated signaling pathway | 3.1 | 0.002 | FBLN1, CTGF, ADAMTS15, COL3A1, FCER1G, TYROBP |
| Elastic fiber assembly | 1.5 | 0.003 | FBLN5, ELN, MFAP4 |
| Neutrophil chemotaxis | 2.6 | 0.003 | C5AR1, LGALS3, FCER1G, CCL19, SPP1 |
| Extracellular matrix organization | 3.1 | 0.003 | FBLN1, LGALS3, FBLN5, ELN, CCDC80, FN1 |
| Ossification | 3.1 | 0.003 | ALOX15, CTGF, MGP, COL5A2, SPP1, FN1 |
Enriched upregulated pathways and biological processes by DQP treatment.
| Term | % |
| Genes |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEGG pathway | |||
| Carbon metabolism | 7.5 | 0.000027 | ME1, ALDOA, GOT2, ME3, ACADM, ENO3, SUCLA2 |
| Biosynthesis of antibiotics | 6.5 | 0.004 | ALDOA, GOT2, ACADM, ENO3, SUCLA2, HADHB |
| Metabolic pathways | 15.1 | 0.008 | NDUFA4, ALDOA, ME1, ME3, ACADM, CHKB, UQCRFS1, HADHB, GOT2, ACSL1, CKM, MCCC1, ENO3, SUCLA2 |
| Fatty acid degradation | 3.2 | 0.023 | ACSL1, ACADM, HADHB |
| Fatty acid metabolism | 3.2 | 0.030 | ACSL1, ACADM, HADHB |
| Valine, leucine, and isoleucine degradation | 3.2 | 0.031 | ACADM, MCCC1, HADHB |
|
| |||
| GO_biological process | |||
| Pyruvate metabolic process | 3.2 | 0.001 | ME1, ME3, PFKFB2 |
| Response to hormone | 5.4 | 0.001 | ME1, BDNF, ACADM, ADRA1B, UQCRFS1 |
| Response to drug | 8.6 | 0.013 | BDNF, ACSL1, ACADM, ADRA1B, ENO3, AQP7, UQCRFS1, SOD2 |
| Glycolytic process | 3.2 | 0.015 | ALDOA, PFKFB2, ENO3 |
| Negative regulation of fat cell differentiation | 3.2 | 0.021 | VEGFA, INSIG1, SOD2 |
| Regulation of synaptic plasticity | 3.2 | 0.021 | BDNF, PSEN2, RAPGEF2 |
| Muscle contraction | 3.2 | 0.024 | TRDN, MYOM2, TMOD4 |
| Response to cold | 3.2 | 0.026 | ACADM, VEGFA, SOD2 |
| Intraciliary transport involved in cilium morphogenesis | 2.2 | 0.033 | IFT81, PCM1 |
| Oxidation-reduction process | 8.6 | 0.036 | ME1, NDUFA4, ME3, ACADM, L2HGDH, UQCRFS1, OXR1, HADHB |
Figure 3Regulative network by altered transcription factors. Transcription factors were represented as red octagons. Regulated proteins were represented as blue circles. Dot lines represented protein-protein interaction, and solid lines represented protein-gene interactions.
Figure 4Validations of expressions of genes by real-time PCR. (a) Expressions of five genes involved in fatty acids were downregulated in the model group and upregulated by DQP treatment. (b) Expressions of five genes were increased in the MI model group and reduced by DQP treatment. Each group contained six samples. ∗P < 0.05 versus sham group; ∗∗P < 0.01 versus sham group; #P < 0.05 versus model group; ##P < 0.01 versus model group.