| Literature DB >> 27955667 |
Qiyan Wang1, Chun Li2, Qian Zhang1,3, Yuanyuan Wang3, Tianjiao Shi3, Linghui Lu3, Yi Zhang2, Yong Wang4,5, Wei Wang6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: DanQi pill (DQP) is prescribed widely in China and has definite cardioprotective effect on coronary heart disease. Our previous studies proved that DQP could effectively regulate plasma levels of high density lipoprotein (HDL) and low density lipoprotein (LDL). However, the regulatory mechanisms of DQP and its major components Salvianolic acids and Panax notoginseng saponins (DS) on lipid metabolism disorders haven't been comprehensively studied so far.Entities:
Keywords: Components; Coronary heart disease; DanQi pill; PPARs-PGC1α pathway
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27955667 PMCID: PMC5153825 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-016-1496-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Nucleotide sequences of primers used in real-time PCR
| Gene(accession no.) | Primers | Nucleotiede sequences5′-3′ | Size(bp) | Temp(°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPL | Forward | CGCTCCATCCATCTCTTC | 18 | 57.3 |
| Reverse | GGCTCTGACCTTGTTGAT | 18 | 55 | |
| ABCA1 | Forward | GTGGTGTTCTTCCTCGTTA | 19 | 55.4 |
| Reverse | CTTCCGCTTCCTTCTGTAG | 19 | 57.6 | |
| CD36 | Forward | GGCCCTTACACATACAGAGT | 20 | 55.8 |
| Reverse | CCACAGCCAGATTGAGAA | 18 | 55 |
Indicators of heart functions tested by Echocardiography in different groups of rats
| Sham | Model | Positive drug | DQP | DS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVEDd(cm) | 0.64 ± 0.05* | 1.12 ± 0.21 | 1.08 ± 1.68 | 0.76 ± 0.064* | 0.83 ± 0.18 |
| LVEDs(cm) | 0.41 ± 0.02** | 0.75 ± 0.05 | 0.48 ± 0.08* | 0.54 ± 0.080 | 0.64 ± 0.11 |
| EF | 0.68 ± 0.06** | 0.41 ± 0.03 | 0.46 ± 0.06 | 0.47 ± 0.03* | 0.53 ± 0.01* |
| FS(%) | 37.39 ± 5.19* | 20.71 ± 1.68 | 21.70 ± 5.78 | 33.84 ± 6.90* | 36.43 ± 8.76* |
*v.s. model group, P < 0.05, **v.s. model group, P < 0.01
Fig. 1Expressions of ApoA-1, FABP4 and CPT-1A in five groups of rats. Western blot showed that compared with model group, expressions of these three molecules were significantly up-regulated towards normal levels in DQP and DS groups. a Semi-quantitative expressions of ApoA-1 in different groups. b Semi-quantitative expressions of FABP4 in different groups. c Semi-quantitative expressions ofCTP-1A in different groups. n = 6, * v.s. model group, P < 0.05; ** v.s. model group, P < 0.01
mRNA expressions of LPL, CD36 and ABCA1 in each groups
| Sham | Model | Positive | DQP | DS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPL | 3.56 ± 2.75* | 0.15 ± 0.07 | 1.75 ± 0.76** | 1.05 ± 0.60* | 1.45 ± 0.81* |
| ABCA1 | 0.84 ± 0.60* | 0.27 ± 0.21 | 1.36 ± 0.56* | 1.30 ± 0.95 | 1.51 ± 0.67** |
| CD36 | 1.27 ± 0.97* | 0.76 ± 0.46 | 0.84 ± 1.03 | 0.77 ± 0.30 | 0.94 ± 0.57 |
*v.s. model group, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01
Fig. 2Expressions of HMGCR and P450 in different groups. a Semi-quantitative expressions of HMGCR in different groups. b Semi-quantitative expressions of P450 in different groups. n = 6,* v.s. model group, P < 0.05; ** v.s. model group, P < 0.01; ## v.s. DQP group, P < 0.01
Fig. 3Expressions transcription regulators in five groups of rats. a Semi-quantitative expressions of PPAR-α in different groups. b Semi-quantitative expressions of PPAR-γ in different groups. c Semi-quantitative expressions of RXRA in different groups. d Semi-quantitative expressions of PGC-1α in different groups. n = 6, * v.s. model group, P < 0.05; ** v.s. model group, P < 0.01, ## v.s. DQP group, P < 0.01
Fig. 4Expressions of PI3K, AKT1/2 and ERK1/2 in different groups. a Semi-quantitative expressions of PI3K in different groups. b Semi-quantitative expressions of AKT1/2 in different groups. c Semi-quantitative expressions of ERK1/2 in different groups. * v.s. model group, P < 0.05; ** v.s. model group, P < 0.01; ## v.s. DQP group, P < 0.05; ## vs DQP group, P < 0.01