| Literature DB >> 29487622 |
Jian Li1, Guowei Ma1, Lin Ma1, Xiaolin Bao1, Liping Li1, Qian Zhao1, Yousheng Wang1.
Abstract
Effects of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and vacuum precooling on quality and antioxidant properties of blackberries (Rubus spp.) were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance, principal component analysis (PCA), partial least squares (PLS), and path analysis. Results showed that the activities of antioxidant enzymes were enhanced by both 1-MCP treatment and vacuum precooling. PCA could discriminate 1-MCP treated fruit and the vacuum precooled fruit and showed that the radical-scavenging activities in vacuum precooled fruit were higher than those in 1-MCP treated fruit. The scores of PCA showed that H2O2 content was the most important variables of blackberry fruit. PLSR results showed that peroxidase (POD) activity negatively correlated with H2O2 content. The results of path coefficient analysis indicated that glutathione (GSH) also had an indirect effect on H2O2 content.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29487622 PMCID: PMC5816868 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2416461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.885
Changes of quality and reactive oxygen metabolism indexes in blackberries during postharvest storage with different treatments.
| Days of storage | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1-MCP | Vacuum precooling | |||||
| Harvest | 21 d | 38 d | 21 d | 38 d | 21 d | 38 d | |
| Firmness | 21.38d | 12.33b | 6.09a | 15.00bc | 5.84a | 17.76bcd | 18.31cd |
| Decay rate (%) | 0.00a | 0.00a | 21.67c | 0.00a | 11.67b | 0.00a | 18.34c |
| H2O2 (mg/100 g fw) | 6.28a | 16.76b | 23.52d | 18.92c | 31.76f | 16.99b | 26.22e |
| GSH (mg/100 g fw) | 61.55d | 65.89e | 26.62a | 80.80f | 39.43c | 97.02g | 35.22b |
| APX (U/g fw) | 0.02a | 0.03a | 0.09c | 0.05ab | 0.08bc | 0.02a | 0.04a |
| POD (U/g fw) | 105.71b | 5.58a | 1.32a | 5.41a | 4.17a | 5.09a | 4.96a |
| PPO (U/g fw) | 1.54f | 0.75b | 0.59a | 0.92c | 0.91c | 1.2e | 1.1d |
| FRAP (U/g fw) | 45.43e | 30.04b | 36.30c | 28.03a | 42.50d | 36.86c | 48.96f |
| TEAC (U/g fw) | 0.2232b | 0.1980a | 0.2172b | 0.2609c | 0.3192f | 0.2937e | 0.2824d |
| DPPH (U/g fw) | 31.74c | 30.51a | 31.24b | 31.73c | 38.30e | 31.22b | 36.61d |
| NBT (U/g fw) | 7.80a | 33.18e | 26.18c | 35.69f | 24.25b | 36.96g | 30.77d |
| Hydroxyl radical- | 42.51f | 38.17a | 40.75e | 38.90b | 39.33c | 39.97d | 38.05a |
| Total phenol ( | 6.15a | 8.43c | 7.68b | 9.02d | 9.43f | 9.18e | 9.37f |
| Total flavonoid ( | 9.93f | 8.15b | 7.28a | 9.18d | 9.37e | 8.57c | 9.01d |
The different superscript letters in the same row indicated significant difference (P < 0.05).
Figure 1Loadings and scores from PCA of blackberries. “c”: the control group; “t1”: treatment of 1-MCP; “t2”: treatment of vacuum precooling; “dr”: decay rate; “cv”: hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity; “tp”: total phenol; “tf”: total flavonoids.
Figure 2Correlation loading plot from a PLSR model. The inner and outer ellipses represent 50% and 100% of explained variance, respectively. “dr”: decay rate; “cv”: hydroxyl radical-scavenging activity; “tp”: total phenol; “tf”: total flavonoids.
The result of path analysis taking H2O2 as dependent variable.
| GSH | APX | POD | DPPH | Total flavonoid | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct | 0.0441 | 0.2559 | −0.4243 | 0.6499 | −0.1618 |
| →GSH | −0.0307 | 0.0037 | −0.0231 | 0.0101 | |
| →APX | −0.178 | −0.116 | 0.0959 | −0.1044 | |
| →POD | −0.0359 | 0.1923 | 0.0792 | −0.2541 | |
| →DPPH | −0.3397 | 0.2436 | −0.1213 | 0.2654 | |
| →Total flavonoid | −0.0371 | 0.066 | −0.0969 | −0.0661 |