Anna Guacci1, Angela Cordella1, Teresa Rocco1, Giorgio Giurato1,2, Giovanni Nassa2,3, Francesca Rizzo2,3, Chiara Carlomagno4, Stefano Pepe5, Roberta Tarallo2,3, Alessandro Weisz2,3. 1. Genomix4Life srl, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, 'Scuola Medica Salernitana', University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy. 2. Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Genomics, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, 'Scuola Medica Salernitana', University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy. 3. Medical Genomics Program, 'SS. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona' Hospital, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy. 4. Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Napoli 'Federico II', Napoli, Italy. 5. Division of Oncology, 'SS. Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona' Hospital, University of Salerno, Salerno, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common neoplasm in women, with 5%-10% patients showing a familial predisposition, where germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 genes are found in -20% of cases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is among the best available options for genetic screening, providing several benefits that include enhanced sensitivity and unbiased mutation detection. PALB2 (partner and localizer of BRCA2) is a cancer predisposing gene recently described that encodes a protein partner of BRCA2 involved in DNA double-strand break repair and cell cycle control. The DNA damage response represents a key cellular event, targeted by innovative anticancer therapies, including those based on poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors targeting PARP1 and PARP2 enzymes, activated by DNA damage and involved in single-strand break and base excision repair. METHODS: Genomic DNA was isolated from 34 patient samples and four BC cell lines, as controls, and 27 breast cancer predisposing genes belonging to the BRCA1/BRCA2 and PARP pathways were sequenced by NGS. RESULTS: The panel described here allowed identification of several sequence variations in most investigated genes, among which we found a novel truncating mutation in PALB2. CONCLUSIONS: The NGS-based strategy designed here for molecular analysis of a customized panel of BC predisposing and related genes was found to perform effectively, providing a comprehensive exploration of all genomic sequences of the investigated genes. It is thus useful for BC molecular diagnosis, in particular for familiar cases where alterations in routinely investigated genes, such as BRCAs, result to be absent.
BACKGROUND:Breast cancer (BC) is the most common neoplasm in women, with 5%-10% patients showing a familial predisposition, where germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 genes are found in -20% of cases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is among the best available options for genetic screening, providing several benefits that include enhanced sensitivity and unbiased mutation detection. PALB2 (partner and localizer of BRCA2) is a cancer predisposing gene recently described that encodes a protein partner of BRCA2 involved in DNA double-strand break repair and cell cycle control. The DNA damage response represents a key cellular event, targeted by innovative anticancer therapies, including those based on poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors targeting PARP1 and PARP2 enzymes, activated by DNA damage and involved in single-strand break and base excision repair. METHODS: Genomic DNA was isolated from 34 patient samples and four BC cell lines, as controls, and 27 breast cancer predisposing genes belonging to the BRCA1/BRCA2 and PARP pathways were sequenced by NGS. RESULTS: The panel described here allowed identification of several sequence variations in most investigated genes, among which we found a novel truncating mutation in PALB2. CONCLUSIONS: The NGS-based strategy designed here for molecular analysis of a customized panel of BC predisposing and related genes was found to perform effectively, providing a comprehensive exploration of all genomic sequences of the investigated genes. It is thus useful for BC molecular diagnosis, in particular for familiar cases where alterations in routinely investigated genes, such as BRCAs, result to be absent.
Authors: Xianshu Wang; Csilla Szabo; Chiping Qian; Peter G Amadio; Stephen N Thibodeau; James R Cerhan; Gloria M Petersen; Wanguo Liu; Fergus J Couch Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Fergus J Couch; Hermela Shimelis; Chunling Hu; Steven N Hart; Eric C Polley; Jie Na; Emily Hallberg; Raymond Moore; Abigail Thomas; Jenna Lilyquist; Bingjian Feng; Rachel McFarland; Tina Pesaran; Robert Huether; Holly LaDuca; Elizabeth C Chao; David E Goldgar; Jill S Dolinsky Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: G Arpino; M Pensabene; C Condello; R Ruocco; I Cerillo; R Lauria; V Forestieri; M Giuliano; C De Angelis; M Montella; A Crispo; S De Placido Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Antonis C Antoniou; Silvia Casadei; Tuomas Heikkinen; Daniel Barrowdale; Katri Pylkäs; Jonathan Roberts; Andrew Lee; Deepak Subramanian; Kim De Leeneer; Florentia Fostira; Eva Tomiak; Susan L Neuhausen; Zhi L Teo; Sofia Khan; Kristiina Aittomäki; Jukka S Moilanen; Clare Turnbull; Sheila Seal; Arto Mannermaa; Anne Kallioniemi; Geoffrey J Lindeman; Saundra S Buys; Irene L Andrulis; Paolo Radice; Carlo Tondini; Siranoush Manoukian; Amanda E Toland; Penelope Miron; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Susan M Domchek; Bruce Poppe; Kathleen B M Claes; Drakoulis Yannoukakos; Patrick Concannon; Jonine L Bernstein; Paul A James; Douglas F Easton; David E Goldgar; John L Hopper; Nazneen Rahman; Paolo Peterlongo; Heli Nevanlinna; Mary-Claire King; Fergus J Couch; Melissa C Southey; Robert Winqvist; William D Foulkes; Marc Tischkowitz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 91.245