Literature DB >> 29484705

What should be the laboratory approach against isolated prolongation of a activated partial thromboplastin time?

Mesude Falay1, Mehmet Senes2, Dogan Yücel2, Turan Turhan3, Simten Dagdaş1, Melike Pekin1, Namik K Nazaroglu4, Gülsüm Özet1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study is a retrospective evaluation of patients who were subject to mixing study in our laboratory due to prolonged APTT. The preliminary diagnoses, clinical manifestations, and results of additional ordered tests were reviewed. The study aims to investigate whether repeating APTT test with a different assay prior to performing mixed study in patients with prolonged APTT would be a better alternative algorithmic approach in order to save both time and costs.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 166 patients (65 females and 101 males) who were subject to mixing study due to isolated prolonged APTT. Additional ordered tests to identify the etiology and clinical findings were reviewed. All patients who had prolonged APTT as a result of testing with Hemosil Synthasil APTT reagent in ACL TOP analyzer were repeated with Stago Cephascreen APTT reagent in STA-R coagulation analyzer.
RESULTS: APTT test was requested preoperatively in 72.2% of cases. Only 6.6% of the cases had history of bleeding. Correction with mixing study was achieved in 122 (73.5%) cases, among which 75 (45%) cases were found to have APTT test results within reference range when tested with Cephascreen reagent. In 44 (26.5%) cases, mixing study did not result in correction. Only 4 cases were confirmed to have lupus anticoagulants (LA), while 4 cases were diagnosed with hemophilia with inhibitors.
CONCLUSION: Prolonged APTT results should always be retested using a different assay prior to mixing study. The clinician and the laboratory specialist should collaborate at the postanalytical phase.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APTT; coagulation; mixing test

Year:  2018        PMID: 29484705      PMCID: PMC6816984          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  21 in total

1.  Discrepancies between APTT results determined with different evaluation modes on automated coagulation analyzers.

Authors:  M Milos; D Coen Herak; R Zadro
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Recommendations for appropriate activated partial thromboplastin time reagent selection and utilization.

Authors:  George A Fritsma; Francine R Dembitzer; Ankush Randhawa; Marisa B Marques; Elizabeth M Van Cott; Dorothy Adcock-Funk; Ellinor I Peerschke
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  An international study of how laboratories handle and evaluate patient samples after detecting an unexpected APTT prolongation.

Authors:  Éva Ajzner; Dunja Rogic; Piet Meijer; Ann Helen Kristoffersen; Paolo Carraro; Eser Sozmen; Ana Paula Faria; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Applying a direct aPTT ratio (PlatelinLS/ActinFS) permits to identify rapidly and reliably a bleeding-related factor deficiency or a lupus anticoagulant sequential to an isolated prolongation of aPTT in paediatric pre-operative screening.

Authors:  Rong Li; Caroline Swaelens; Francine Vandermijnsbrugge; Brigitte Cantinieaux
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Investigation of a prolonged APTT. Different approaches taken by laboratories to achieve the same diagnosis.

Authors:  I Jennings; D P Kitchen; S Kitchen; T A L Woods; I D Walker
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.877

6.  Laboratory hemostasis: milestones in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Emmanuel J Favaloro
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 7.  Laboratory monitoring of haemostasis.

Authors:  A Fowler; D J Perry
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  The responsiveness of different APTT reagents to mild factor VIII, IX and XI deficiencies.

Authors:  A Bowyer; S Kitchen; M Makris
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Mixing tests: diagnostic aides in the investigation of prolonged prothrombin times and activated partial thromboplastin times.

Authors:  Geoffrey Kershaw; Daniel Orellana
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.180

Review 10.  Diagnostics of Inherited Bleeding Disorders of Secondary Hemostasis: An Easy Guide for Routine Clinical Laboratories.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Massimo Franchini; Emmanuel J Favaloro
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 4.180

View more
  3 in total

1.  What should be the laboratory approach against isolated prolongation of a activated partial thromboplastin time?

Authors:  Mesude Falay; Mehmet Senes; Dogan Yücel; Turan Turhan; Simten Dagdaş; Melike Pekin; Namik K Nazaroglu; Gülsüm Özet
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  A Case of a Patient Who Is Diagnosed with Mild Acquired Hemophilia A after Tooth Extraction Died of Acute Subdural Hematoma due to Head Injury.

Authors:  Tomohisa Kitamura; Tsuyoshi Sato; Eiji Ikami; Yosuke Fukushima; Tetsuya Yoda
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2018-12-09

3.  A multi-laboratory assessment of lupus anticoagulant assays performed on the ACL TOP 50 family for harmonized testing in a large laboratory network.

Authors:  Emmanuel J Favaloro; Soma Mohammed; Ronny Vong; Kent Chapman; Priscilla Swanepoel; Geoffrey Kershaw; Nancy Cai; Sarah Just; Lynne Connelly; Timothy Brighton; Leonardo Pasalic
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.450

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.