BACKGROUND: The assessment of physical activity levels of hospitalised older people requires accurate and reliable measures. Physical activities that older people in hospital commonly engage in include exercises and walking. Measurement of physical activity levels of older inpatients is essential to evaluate the impact of interventions to improve physical activity levels and to determine associations between physical activity in hospital and other health-related outcome measures. OBJECTIVE: To determine which measures are used to measure physical activity of older people in hospital, and to describe their properties and applications. METHOD: A systematic review of four databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and AMED was conducted for papers published from 1996 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were participants aged ≥ 65 years and studies which included measures of physical activity in the acute medical inpatient setting. Studies which specifically assessed the activity levels of surgical patients or patients with neurological conditions such as stroke or brain injury were excluded. All study designs were included in the review. RESULTS: 18 studies were included from 127 articles selected for full review. 15 studies used objective measures to measure the physical activity of older inpatients: 11 studies used accelerometers and four used direct systematic observations. Seven accelerometers were identified including the StepWatch Activity Monitor, activPAL, GENEActiv, Kenz Lifecorder EX, Actiwatch-L, Tractivity and AugmenTech Inc. Pittsburgh accelerometer. Three studies used a subjective measure (interviews with nurses and patients) to classify patients into low, intermediate and high mobility groups. The StepWatch Activity Monitor was reported to be most accurate at step-counting in patients with slow gait speed or altered gait. The activPAL was reported to be highly accurate at classifying postures. CONCLUSION: Physical activity levels of older inpatients can be measured using accelerometers. The accuracy of the accelerometers varies between devices and population-specific validation studies are needed to determine their suitability in measuring physical activity levels of hospitalised older people. Subjective measures are less accurate but can be a practical way of measuring physical activity in a larger group of patients.
BACKGROUND: The assessment of physical activity levels of hospitalised older people requires accurate and reliable measures. Physical activities that older people in hospital commonly engage in include exercises and walking. Measurement of physical activity levels of older inpatients is essential to evaluate the impact of interventions to improve physical activity levels and to determine associations between physical activity in hospital and other health-related outcome measures. OBJECTIVE: To determine which measures are used to measure physical activity of older people in hospital, and to describe their properties and applications. METHOD: A systematic review of four databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL and AMED was conducted for papers published from 1996 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were participants aged ≥ 65 years and studies which included measures of physical activity in the acute medical inpatient setting. Studies which specifically assessed the activity levels of surgical patients or patients with neurological conditions such as stroke or brain injury were excluded. All study designs were included in the review. RESULTS: 18 studies were included from 127 articles selected for full review. 15 studies used objective measures to measure the physical activity of older inpatients: 11 studies used accelerometers and four used direct systematic observations. Seven accelerometers were identified including the StepWatch Activity Monitor, activPAL, GENEActiv, Kenz Lifecorder EX, Actiwatch-L, Tractivity and AugmenTech Inc. Pittsburgh accelerometer. Three studies used a subjective measure (interviews with nurses and patients) to classify patients into low, intermediate and high mobility groups. The StepWatch Activity Monitor was reported to be most accurate at step-counting in patients with slow gait speed or altered gait. The activPAL was reported to be highly accurate at classifying postures. CONCLUSION: Physical activity levels of older inpatients can be measured using accelerometers. The accuracy of the accelerometers varies between devices and population-specific validation studies are needed to determine their suitability in measuring physical activity levels of hospitalised older people. Subjective measures are less accurate but can be a practical way of measuring physical activity in a larger group of patients.
Authors: Cynthia J Brown; Kathleen T Foley; John D Lowman; Paul A MacLennan; Javad Razjouyan; Bijan Najafi; Julie Locher; Richard M Allman Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Barbara Doherty-King; Ju Young Yoon; Kristen Pecanac; Roger Brown; Jane Mahoney Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Lisa H Colbert; Charles E Matthews; Thomas C Havighurst; Kyungmann Kim; Dale A Schoeller Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Alison M Mudge; Prue McRae; Kirstie McHugh; Lauren Griffin; Andrew Hitchen; James Walker; Mark Cruickshank; Norman R Morris; Suzanne Kuys Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Ann Christine Bodilsen; Mette Merete Pedersen; Janne Petersen; Nina Beyer; Ove Andersen; Louise Lawson Smith; Henrik Kehlet; Thomas Bandholm Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Brian M Sandroff; Robert W Motl; Lara A Pilutti; Yvonne C Learmonth; Ipek Ensari; Deirdre Dlugonski; Rachel E Klaren; Swathi Balantrapu; Barry J Riskin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Peter Hartley; Victoria L Keevil; Kate Westgate; Tom White; Søren Brage; Roman Romero-Ortuno; Christi Deaton Journal: Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res Date: 2018-10-18
Authors: Niek Koenders; Joost P H Seeger; Teun van der Giessen; Ties J van den Hurk; Indy G M Smits; Anne M Tankink; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Thomas J Hoogeboom Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Markus S Anker; Stefan D Anker; Andrew J S Coats; Stephan von Haehling Journal: J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 12.910